Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
The other day, a special correspondent of The Times repeated what he said was a familiar and general criticism of the Third Programme The Third as a recent talk on Professor R. H. Tawney reminded us must stop mistaking an Oxford accent for broadcast brilliance In this greatly reduced but highly important programme there is less room than ever for the lacklustre broadcast, no matter who delivers it. In other words, broadcasting, like writing, is an art and it must be addressed to listeners, as books are addressed to readers, who are known as the Public. If talk or book condescends, it will alienate those who come eagerly to it if it is dry, nobody will attend and if it is too agreeable the more priggish critics will suspect the talker or writer of a hideous sin.
Library Review – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 1, 1962
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.