Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Mingpao
South China Morning Post
N. Thrift (2000)
Performing Cultures in the New EconomyAnnals of the Association of American Geographers, 90
Hong Kong Economic Times
Anonymous (2005)
Obstacles of CEPA? Answers to eight queriesSouthern Metropolis Daily
South China Morning Post
Akina (2004)
One film with two versions-is the Mainland market goodto Hong Kong film? (一 片 兩 制 - 內 地 巿 場 對 港 產 片 是福 是 禍)City Entertainment
Mingpao
Mingpao
Mingpao
Mingpao
Akina (2004)
CEPA and Raymond Wong’s Mandarin EmpireCity Entertainment
Mingpao Monthly
Esther Yau (1994)
New Chinese Cinemas: Border Crossing
Akina and Yan (2004)
Hong Kong film in urgency: diagnosis and cureCity Entertainment
Mingpao
The International Chinese Newsweekly
Mingpao
J. Lee, Satish Kolluri (2016)
Hong Kong and Bollywood, 300
Anonymous (2009)
SARFT bans the showing of actists with Scandal, Gillian Chung was said to be the first oneMingpao
Mingpao
Mingpao
Mingpao
Mingpao
Mingpao
Anonymous (2008)
Taboo in Mainland: uneasy filmmakingMingpao
South China Morning Post
Anonymous (2009)
Alan Mak, the secret makerHong Kong Cinema
Anonymous (2005)
Lam Siu-Ming changes before the fading out of the industryApple Daily
Mingpao
Mingpao
Mingpao
S. Teo (1997)
Hong Kong cinema : the extra dimensions
The International Chinese Newsweekly
Anonymous (2005)
Build it and they will comeSouth China Morning Post
Wing (2002)
Dead end? Stimulating Hong Kong film industryCity Entertainment
PurposeSince the launch of the Mainland and Hong Kong Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement (CEPA) in 2003, Hong Kong cinema is believed to have confronted drastic changes. Hong Kong cinema is described to be dying, lacking creative space and losing local distinctiveness. A decade later, the rise of Hong Kong – China coproduction cinema under CEPA has been normalized and changed the once pessimism in the industry. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how Hong Kong cinema adjusted its production and creation in the first 10 years of CEPA.Design/methodology/approachBeginning with a review of the overall development, three paradigmatic cases are examined for reflecting upon what the major industrial and commercial concerns on the Hong Kong – China coproduction model are, and how such a coproduction model is not developed as smooth as what the Hong Kong filmmakers expected.FindingsCollectively, this paper singles out the difficulties in operation and the limit of transnationality that occur in the Chinese context for the development of Hong Kong cinema under the Hong Kong – China coproduction model.Originality/valueThis is the author’s research in his five-year study of Hong Kong cinema and it contributes a lot to the field of cinema studies with relevant industrial and policy concern.
Social Transformations in Chinese Societies – Emerald Publishing
Published: Sep 5, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.