Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Burrell, G. Morgan
Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis: Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life
M.H. Taylor
The market for audit services in Japan
Michael Kend (2008)
Client industry audit expertise: towards a better understandingPacific Accounting Review, 20
S. Cahan
Foreword
D. Emanuel
Editorial
G.L. Sundem
Overview of four years of submissions to the accounting review
Alastair Marsden, R. Poskitt, Yinjian Wang (2011)
The impact of New Zealand's disclosure reform on differential managerial disclosure behaviour for good news versus bad news firmsPacific Accounting Review, 23
Derek Oler, M. Oler, Christopher Skousen (2009)
Characterizing Accounting ResearchS&P Global Market Intelligence Research Paper Series
S. Gallhofer, J. Haslam, S. Cahan (1997)
REVIEW OF PACIFIC ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 1988–96Pacific Accounting Review, 9
Leanne Gundry, Gregory Liyanarachchi (2007)
Time budget pressure, auditors' personality type, and the incidence of reduced audit quality practicesPacific Accounting Review, 19
Chalmers Johnson (1989)
South Korean democratization: The role of economic developmentPacific Review, 2
Isaac Otchere (2003)
"Accounting and Finance" at forty: a retrospective evaluationAccounting and Finance, 43
M. Bradbury, D. Emanuel, C. Jardine
A taxonomy of content and citations in Pacific Accounting Review
I. Zimmer
Reactions by Australian firms to accounting regulations
Purpose – In 2012, Pacific Accounting Review ( PAR ) completed its 25th year of existence. This paper aims to review all articles published in PAR as a report on the “stewardship” of the journal. Design/methodology/approach – Research papers published in PAR are analysed by topic, research methodology, author and institutional affiliation. This approach follows prior reviews in PAR . A comparison is also made with PAR over the period 1988‐1996 and Accounting and Finance over the period 1973‐1999 and the “top accounting journals” over the period 1990‐2007. Findings – The analysis indicates that PAR publishes papers across a wide range of topics, but uses research methodologies that are consistent with mainstream accounting research (as undertaken by the “top accounting journals”). The authors of PAR are concentrated in New Zealand and Australia, as is the source data. No strong trends were perceived in the data. In conclusion, PAR can be characterised as a broadly based accounting and finance journal that is primarily competing in an Australasian context. Practical implications – This review provides some insight as to how the journal has evolved and how the mission statement has been put into effect. The journal has maintained much of its original mission. The anticipated “dialogue between researchers and practitioners” has not developed, probably due to lack of sponsorship by the profession. The paper should also form a basis for informing how to further develop the journal. Originality/value – The paper updates the last review of PAR which was completed in 1997.
Pacific Accounting Review – Emerald Publishing
Published: Nov 15, 2013
Keywords: Australia; New Zealand; Accounting literature; Institutional affiliation; Research methodology
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.