Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
John Scott (2010)
What is social network analysis
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15
(2013)
Motivations and challenges
Peter Goldsmith, Samuel Kane (2002)
The Farm Business Environment and New Generation Cooperatives as an Innovation Strategy
(2013)
Two cheers for web u!
A. Bruns (2012)
HOW LONG IS A TWEET? MAPPING DYNAMIC CONVERSATION NETWORKS ON TWITTER USING GAWK AND GEPHIInformation, Communication & Society, 15
Computers & Education, 41
Journal of Educational Computing Research, 39
(2013)
Social network analysis and data mining: An application to the E-learning context Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2
Physical Review E, 84
Tanmay Sinha (2014)
Supporting MOOC Instruction with Social Network AnalysisArXiv, abs/1401.5175
Research & Practice in Assessment, 8
Educational Technology & Society, 15
R. Aviv, Zippy Erlich, G. Ravid, Aviva Geva (2019)
NETWORK ANALYSIS OF KNOWLEDGE CONSTRUCTION IN ASYNCHRONOUS LEARNING NETWORKSOnline Learning
Educational Research Review, 12
Steve Cayzer can be contacted at: s.cayzer@bath.ac.uk
J. Foster (2008)
The Sustainability Mirage: Illusion and Reality in the Coming War on Climate Change
(2013)
networked learning and computer-supported collaborative learning: A role for Social Network Analysis. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7
Apostolos Koutropoulos, M. Gallagher, Sean Abajian, I. Waard, R. Hogue, N. Keskin, C. Rodriguez (2012)
Emotive Vocabulary in MOOCs: Context & Participant RetentionThe European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 15
George Siemens (2006)
Connectivism: Learning Theory or Pastime of the Self-Amused?
Computers & Education, 49
The Internet and Higher Education, 23
(2005)
formats for massive open online courses. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/?p=Special&sp=init2&article=516 Russo T.C
C. Rodriguez (2012)
MOOCs and the AI-Stanford Like Courses: Two Successful and Distinct Course Formats for Massive Open Online Courses.The European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 15
Communication & Society, 15
Communication Education, 54
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explore the nature of interactions between learners in a massive open online course (MOOC), particularly role of the tutors in such interactions. For educators concerned with sustainability literacy, the authors are necessarily both affected by, and effectors of, digital pedagogies. The call for papers for this special issue challenged the authors to consider whether digital pedagogies are “supportive of sustainability or perpetuators of unsustainability”. As might be expected, this question is not a simple binary choice and the authors have chosen to address it indirectly, by considering the nature of interaction in a global, digitally connected community of learners. In particular, the changing role of tutors in these communities, and the possible implications of this change on sustainable literacy, are examined.Design/methodology/approachThe authors focus on the “Sustainability for Professionals” massive open online course (MOOC) delivered by the University of Bath on the FutureLearn platform which hosts the “Inside Cancer” MOOC, also from Bath. “Sustainability for Professionals” is pedagogically connectivist, with “Inside Cancer” being more traditional and instructor led. The authors used social network analysis (SNA) for the research. It is a key tool to understand interactions in an online environment and allows quantitative comparison between different networks and thus between courses. In the context of digital pedagogy, the authors used a number of relevant SNA metrics to carry out analysis of MOOC network structures.FindingsIt was found that MOOCs are different in their network structure but tend to adapt to the subject matter. Digital pedagogies for sustainability result in a qualitative as well as quantitative change in learning where course design affects the learning process and gatekeepers are critical for information flow. These gatekeepers are distinct from tutors in the network. In such a network, tutors’ role is limited to course delivery and verifying, depending on course content, the information within the network. The analysis shows that network learning is dependent on course design and content, and gatekeepers exercise influence over the information within the network.Originality/valueThis study has implications for sustainability literacy. The authors examined the extent to which patterns of interaction in the network affect the learning process, and how this can help participants engage with the concept of sustainability. They used SNA to explore the nature of interaction between learners in a MOOC, particularly the role of the tutors in mediating such interactions. They also found that tutors can and do take a central role in early runs of the MOOC; however, with the subsequent runs, the removal of tutor nodes has little effect, suggesting that different modes of learning driven by participants are possible in a MOOC community.
On the Horizon – Emerald Publishing
Published: Feb 13, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.