Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Michel Pham, T. Avnet (2004)
Ideals and Oughts and the Reliance of Affect Versus Substance in PersuasionSocial Science Research Network
Salvador Ruiz, Mariafrancesca Sicilia (2004)
The impact of cognitive and/or affective processing styles on consumer response to advertising appealsJournal of Business Research, 57
C. Carver, T. White (1994)
Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS ScalesJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67
S. Boesen-Mariani, Pierrick Gomez, Marie-Laure Gavard-Perret (2010)
L'orientation régulatrice: un concept prometteur en marketingRecherche et Applications en Marketing, 25
Joseph Cesario, Heidi Grant, E. Higgins (2004)
Regulatory fit and persuasion: transfer from "Feeling Right.".Journal of personality and social psychology, 86 3
Guangzhi Zhao, C. Pechmann (2007)
The Impact of Regulatory Focus on Adolescents’ Response to Antismoking Advertising CampaignsJournal of Marketing Research, 44
Arnd Florack, Martin Scarabis (2006)
How advertising claims affect brand preferences and category–brand associations: The role of regulatory fitPsychology & Marketing, 23
A. Drolet, Patti Williams, Loraine Lau-Gesk (2007)
Age-related differences in responses to affective vs. rational ads for hedonic vs. utilitarian productsMarketing Letters, 18
A. Mattila (1999)
Do emotional appeals work for servicesInternational Journal of Service Industry Management, 10
P. Podsakoff, D. Organ (1986)
Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and ProspectsJournal of Management, 12
M. Holbrook, J. O'Shaughnessy (1984)
The role of emotion in advertisingPsychology & Marketing, 1
R. Suri, K. Monroe (2001)
The effects of need for cognition and trait anxiety on price acceptabilityPsychology & Marketing, 18
J. Cacioppo, R. Petty (1982)
The need for cognition.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42
Abhijit Biswas, J. Olsen, Valérie Carlet (1992)
A Comparison of Print Advertisements from the United States and FranceJournal of Advertising, 21
Bob Cutler, E. Thomas, S. Rao (2000)
Informational/Transformational AdvertisingJournal of International Consumer Marketing, 12
Jane McKay-Nesbitt, R. Manchanda, Malcolm Smith, B. Huhmann (2011)
Effects of age, need for cognition, and affective intensity on advertising effectivenessJournal of Business Research, 64
James Anderson, D. Gerbing (1988)
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACHPsychological Bulletin, 103
Maggie Geuens, Patrick Pelsmacker (1999)
Affect intensity revisited: Individual differences and the communication effects of emotional stimuliPsychology & Marketing, 16
S. Boesen-Mariani, Pierrick Gomez, Marie-Laure Gavard-Perret (2010)
Regulatory Focus: A Promising Concept for Marketing ResearchRecherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition), 25
E. Higgins, R. Friedman, R. Harlow, L. Idson, O. Ayduk, Amy Taylor (2001)
Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention prideEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 31
M. Igbaria, N. Zinatelli, Paul Cragg, A. Cavaye (1997)
Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation ModelMIS Q., 21
Kelly Haws, U. Dholakia, W. Bearden (2009)
An Assessment of Chronic Regulatory Focus MeasuresJournal of Marketing Research, 47
C. Micu, T. Chowdhury (2010)
The Effect of Message's Regulatory Focus and Product Type on PersuasionJournal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 18
David Moore, William Harris, Hong Chen (1995)
Affect Intensity: An Individual Difference Response to Advertising AppealsJournal of Consumer Research, 22
G. Naylor, Susan Kleiser, J. Baker, Eric Yorkston (2008)
Using transformational appeals to enhance the retail experienceJournal of Retailing, 84
Marla Stafford, Ellen Day (1995)
Retail Services Advertising: The Effects of Appeal, Medium, and ServiceJournal of Advertising, 24
E. Shafir, Itamar Simonson, A. Tversky (2006)
The Construction of Preference: Reason-Based Choice
E. Higgins, T. Higgins (1987)
Self-discrepancy: a theory relating self and affect.Psychological review, 94 3
A. Mehta, Scott Purvis (2006)
Reconsidering Recall and Emotion in AdvertisingJournal of Advertising Research, 46
Jane Sojka, Joan Giese (2006)
Communicating through pictures and words: Understanding the role of affect and cognition in processing visual and verbal informationPsychology & Marketing, 23
C. Fornell, D. Larcker (1981)
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research, 18
Nancy Albers-Miller, Marla Stafford (1999)
An international analysis of emotional and rational appeals in services vs goods advertisingJournal of Consumer Marketing, 16
M. Snyder, Kenneth DeBono (1985)
Appeals to image and claims about quality: Understanding the psychology of advertising.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49
A. Bandura (1982)
Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency.American Psychologist, 37
C. Hopkins
My life in advertising
E. Okada (2005)
Justification Effects on Consumer Choice of Hedonic and Utilitarian GoodsJournal of Marketing Research, 42
E. Higgins, C. Roney, Ellen Crowe, Charles Hymes (1994)
Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance: distinct self-regulatory systems.Journal of personality and social psychology, 66 2
M. Copeland (1969)
Principles of merchandising
Nathalie Dens, P. Pelsmacker (2010)
Attitudes toward the extension and parent brand in response to extension advertisingJournal of Business Research, 63
Angela Lee, Jennifer Aaker (2004)
Bringing the frame into focus: the influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion.Journal of personality and social psychology, 86 2
Matthew Thomson, D. Macinnis, C. Park (2005)
The Ties That Bind: Measuring the Strength of Consumers’ Emotional Attachments to BrandsJournal of Consumer Psychology, 15
D. Smits, P. Boeck (2006)
From BIS/BAS to the big fiveEuropean Journal of Personality, 20
J. Bettman, M. Sujan (1987)
Effects of Framing on Evaluation of Comparable and Noncomparable Alternatives by Expert and Novice ConsumersJournal of Consumer Research, 14
Jae-Won Hong, G. Zinkhan (1995)
Self-concept and advertising effectiveness: The influence of congruency, conspicuousness, and response modePsychology & Marketing, 12
Nathalie Dens, Patrick Pelsmacker (2010)
Consumer response to different advertising appeals for new products: The moderating influence of branding strategy and product category involvementJournal of Brand Management, 18
R. Bagozzi, Youjae Yi (1988)
On the evaluation of structural equation modelsJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16
R. Bagozzi, T. Heatherton (1994)
A general approach to representing multifaceted personality constructs: Application to state self‐esteemStructural Equation Modeling, 1
Yong Zhang, B. Gelb (1996)
Matching Advertising Appeals to Culture: The Influence of Products' Use ConditionsJournal of Advertising, 25
Yong Zhang, R. Buda (1999)
Moderating Effects of Need for Cognition on Responses to Positively versus Negatively Framed Advertising MessagesJournal of Advertising, 28
M. Fransen, M. Reinders, J. Bartels, R. Maassen (2010)
The influence of regulatory fit on evaluation and intentions to buy genetically modified foods: The mediating role of social identificationJournal of Marketing Communications, 16
E. Higgins (1998)
Promotion and Prevention: Regulatory Focus as A Motivational PrincipleAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30
L. Dubé, Amitava Chattopadhyay, Anick Letarte (1996)
To match or not to match : should advertising appeals match the basis of consumers' attitudes?
Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to examine the dynamics of self-regulatory focus (SRF) in the context of advertising effectiveness pertaining to rational vs emotional appeals. Past research has dichotomized self-regulatory (SR) foci (i.e. prevention or promotion) on the basis of an individual’s so-called “chronic” orientation, i.e. high or low prevention focus; high or low promotion focus. However, psychological theorists purport that SRF is orthogonal and, thus, various combinations of both foci are evident in any given population. Design/methodology/approach– A two (rational appeal vs emotional appeal)×two (utilitarian product vs hedonic product) experimental design was used. Data was collected via an online survey instrument which included the stimulus advertisements (experimental manipulations) and the relevant independent (SRF) and dependent measures (advertising effectiveness). Findings– The findings of this study support application of regulatory focus theory (RFT) as an appropriate framework to study consumer behaviour and as a mechanism by which to segment consumers. However, past advertising research has predominantly examined consumer’s “chronic” foci (i.e. prevention and promotion). This study found that consumers can adopt various combinations of information processing styles and goal orientations and cannot be boxed into dichotomous categories based on either a prevention of promotion focus. As such, the findings reveal very different conclusions in contrast to previous advertising and marketing research in the SRF area. Originality/value– This study is the first to approach SRF from a quadratic perspective (i.e. involving all SRF combinations). In calling to question the validity of previous findings, this study paves the way for numerous future research opportunities.
Marketing Intelligence & Planning – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 1, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.