Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D.C. Everest School District
Direct testimony – Kristine A. Gilmore on behalf of D.C. Everest area school district
J. Fargione, J. Hill, D. Tilman, S. Polasky, P. Hawthorn
Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt
A. Hector (2008)
Faculty Opinions recommendation of Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt.
Nils Markusson, F. Kern, J. Watson, S. Arapostathis, H. Chalmers, N. Ghaleigh, P. Heptonstall, P. Pearson, D. Rossati, Stewart Russell (2012)
A socio-technical framework for assessing the viability of carbon capture and storage technologyTechnological Forecasting and Social Change, 79
EU
Biodiesels pollute more than crude oil, leaked data show
B. Pedroli, B. Elbersen, P. Frederiksen, U. Grandin, R. Heikkilä, P. Krogh, Z. Izakovičová, A. Johansen, L. Meiresonne, J. Spijker (2013)
Is energy cropping in Europe compatible with biodiversity? – Opportunities and threats to biodiversity from land-based production of biomass for bioenergy purposesBiomass & Bioenergy, 55
P. Upham, P. Thornley, J. Tomei, P. Boucher (2009)
Substitutable biodiesel feedstocks for the UK: a review of sustainability issues with reference to the UK RTFOJournal of Cleaner Production, 17
Global100
Global 100 Index
M. Finco, W. Doppler (2010)
Bioenergy and sustainable development: The dilemma of food security and climate change in the Brazilian savannahEnergy for Sustainable Development, 14
A. Popp, M. Krause, J. Dietrich, H. Lotze-Campen, Marian Leimbach, T. Beringer, N. Bauer (2012)
Additional CO2 emissions from land use change — Forest conservation as a precondition for sustainable production of second generation bioenergyEcological Economics, 74
Domtar
Initial brief (CONFIDENTIAL version) of Domtar paper company
CUB
CUB initial brief
S. Burgos, Pablo Ruiz, R. Koifman (2013)
Changes to indoor air quality as a result of relocating families from slums to public housing.Atmospheric environment, 70
Régis Rathmann, A. Szklo, R. Schaeffer (2010)
Land use competition for production of food and liquid biofuels: An analysis of the arguments in the current debateRenewable Energy, 35
P. Upham (2009)
Applying environmental-behaviour concepts to renewable energy siting controversy: Reflections on a longitudinal bioenergy case studyEnergy Policy, 37
Clean Wisconsin
Post hearing brief
R. Mangoyana, Timothy Smith (2011)
Decentralised bioenergy systems: A review of opportunities and threatsEnergy Policy, 39
P. Thornley, D. Cooper (2008)
The effectiveness of policy instruments in promoting bioenergyBiomass & Bioenergy, 32
S. McLaughlin, M. Walsh (1995)
Evaluating environmental consequences of producing herbaceous crops for bioenergy.Biomass & Bioenergy, 14
CUB
Direct testimony of Richard S. Hahn on behalf of CUB
D.C. Everest School District
Direct testimony – David L. Macintosh on behalf of D.C. Everest area school district
V. Visschers, C. Keller, M. Siegrist (2011)
Climate change benefits and energy supply benefits as determinants of acceptance of nuclear power stations: Investigating an explanatory modelEnergy Policy, 39
E. Engelhaupt (2007)
Biofueling water problems.Environmental science & technology, 41 22
J. Domac, K. Richards, S. Risović (2005)
Socio-economic drivers in implementing bioenergy projectsBiomass & Bioenergy, 28
Kirk Smith, J. Samet, I. Romieu, N. Bruce (2000)
Indoor air pollution in developing countries and acute lower respiratory infections in childrenThorax, 55
Helmut Haberl, K. Erb, F. Krausmann, A. Bondeau, C. Lauk, Christoph Müller, C. Plutzar, Julia Steinberger (2011)
Global bioenergy potentials from agricultural land in 2050: Sensitivity to climate change, diets and yieldsBiomass & Bioenergy, 35
T. Nussbaumer (2003)
Combustion and Co-combustion of Biomass: Fundamentals, Technologies, and Primary Measures for Emission Reduction†Energy & Fuels, 17
Domtar
2011‐01‐06 Domtar paper company
E. Wakker, S. Watch, J. Rozario (2004)
Greasy palms: the social and ecological impacts of large-scale oil palm plantation development in Southeast Asia.
N. Sasaki, W. Knorr, D. Foster, H. Etoh, Hiroshi Ninomiya, S. Chay, Sophanarith Kim, Sengxi Sun (2009)
Woody Biomass and Bioenergy Potentials in Southeast Asia between 1990 and 2020Applied Energy, 86
P. Abbott, C. Hurt, W. Tyner
What's driving food prices
A. Ignaciuk, F. Vöhringer, A. Ruijs, E. Ierland (2006)
Competition between biomass and food production in the presence of energy policies: a partial equilibrium analysisEnergy Policy, 34
Ida Nurlail, S. Yuliar, Rionita Amir (2012)
Multicultural in Indonesia's Biofuel Innovation Initiative: Critical Issues of Land Use and Sustainable EnvironmentProcedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 35
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to identify the most significant uncertainties for bioenergy applications, in order to identify factors determining the success of introducing bioenergy into the current energy system. Design/methodology/approach – A framework is built for identifying the most significant uncertainties based on studies exploring the positive potentials as well as possible negative effects of bioenergy. The framework is applied to explore uncertainties of bioenergy‐based transport fuels and heat and power generation through two real life case studies. Findings – The results indicate that the most significant uncertainties are environmental and economic. Bioenergy applications have potential to mitigate climate change, but also come with negative environmental effects. Case studies show that operations in developing nations contain higher political/institutional and social uncertainty than those in developed countries, due to weaker regulations and enforcement. Research limitations/implications – The paper is part of an on‐going research project. Results will be verified with stakeholder interviews and analysis. Further institutional analysis of the country settings is necessary. Practical implications – The use of a feedstock with high environmental, social and institutional uncertainties will lower public acceptance. Acting in accordance to the law is not sufficient to ensure sustainability and additional, voluntary measures should be undertaken. Originality/value – The paper identifies the most significant uncertainties for bioenergy. Uncertainties from social acceptance and institutional settings are higher in developing countries and acceptability requires more than following regulations.
Management of Environmental Quality An International Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 8, 2014
Keywords: Institutions; Acceptability; Biofuels; Bioenergy; Palm oil; Uncertainties
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.