Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Gary Giroux, Andrew McLelland (2003)
Governance structures and accounting at large municipalitiesJournal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22
R. Hendrick (1998)
The Impact of Federal Grants and Other Funds on General Fund Expenditure Decisions: A Detailed Analysis of One CityJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8
David Ammons (2001)
Tools for Decision Making: A Practical Guide for Local Government
K. Thurmaier (1990)
Information Resources Management Expenditures in the States: A Case for Integrating Accounting and Budgeting SystemsPublic Economics eJournal
T. Davis (1991)
Internal service operations: Strategies for increasing their effectiveness and controlling their costOrganizational Dynamics, 20
(2010)
Core Concepts of Government and Not-For-Profit Accounting
Charles Coe, Elizabethann O’Sullivan (1993)
Accounting for the Hidden Costs: A National Study of Internal Service Funds and Other Indirect Costing Methods in Municipal GovernmentsPublic Administration Review, 53
R. Ingram, D. DeJong (1987)
The effect of regulation on local government disclosure practicesJournal of Accounting and Public Policy, 6
Robert Lee, Ronald Johnson (1973)
Public Budgeting Systems
Steve Modlin (2008)
Defining Involvement of County Commissioners in the Budget Formulation ProcessPolitics and Policy, 36
I. Rubin (1993)
Who Invented Budgeting in the United StatesPublic Administration Review, 53
Studies involving the allocation of funds among local governments usually are broad in nature with foci based on a variety of factors ranging from service demand to performance outcomes. The conundrum of indirect costs allocation associated with service demand continues to confront local governments. The internal service fund (ISF) has been the primary device used in this endeavor, but over the past two decades, its utilization has decreased. County finance officers in the southeastern United States were surveyed to determine why the ISF is not as prevalently used as in previous years and what has happened to indirect costs as a result of these changes. Findings suggest many reasons for ISF's usage decline including limited usefulness and reallocation of indirect costs to departments. In addition, county governments with a cost allocation plan and larger budget sizes continue to use the ISF as an accounting device
Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting & Financial Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 1, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.