Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/emerald-publishing/an-industry-4-0-maturity-model-proposal-xBhWNnLdkJ
References (23)
-
Jian Qin, Ying Liu, R. Grosvenor (2016)
A categorical framework of manufacturing for industry 4.0 and beyondProcedia CIRP, 52
-
Andreas Schumacher, Selim Erol, W. Sihn (2016)
A Maturity Model for Assessing Industry 4.0 Readiness and Maturity of Manufacturing EnterprisesProcedia CIRP, 52
-
C. Scheuermann, S. Verclas, B. Brügge (2015)
Agile Factory - An Example of an Industry 4.0 Manufacturing Process2015 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems, Networks, and Applications
-
M. Ghobakhloo (2018)
The future of manufacturing industry: a strategic roadmap toward Industry 4.0Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management
-
Volkan Gunes, Steffen Peter, T. Givargis, F. Vahid (2014)
A Survey on Concepts, Applications, and Challenges in Cyber-Physical SystemsKSII Trans. Internet Inf. Syst., 8
-
T. Bruin, Ronald Freeze, U. Kulkarni, M. Rosemann (2005)
Understanding the Main Phases of Developing a Maturity Assessment Model -
(2014)
ScienceDirect Variety Management in Manufacturing . Proceedings of the 47 th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems Cyber-physical production systems : Roots , expectations and R & D challenges -
Jorge Posada, C. Toro, I. Barandiaran, D. Oyarzun, D. Stricker, R. Amicis, Eduardo Pinto, P. Eisert, J. Döllner, Ivan Vallarino (2015)
Visual Computing as a Key Enabling Technology for Industrie 4.0 and Industrial InternetIEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 35
-
H. Elmaraghy, W. ElMaraghy (2016)
Smart Adaptable Assembly SystemsProcedia CIRP, 44
-
T. Stock, G. Seliger (2016)
Opportunities of Sustainable Manufacturing in Industry 4.0Procedia CIRP, 40
-
J. Lee, B. Bagheri, Hung-An Kao (2015)
A Cyber-Physical Systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systemsManufacturing letters, 3
-
Yılmaz Gökşen, Eda Çevik, Hüseyin Avunduk (2015)
A Case Analysis on the Focus on the Maturity Models and Information TechnologiesProcedia. Economics and finance, 19
-
Talita Souza, Carlos Gomes (2015)
Assessment of Maturity in Project Management: A Bibliometric Study of Main Models -
Cyber-physical production systems: roots, expectations and R&D challenges
Procedia CIRP, 17
-
M. Rüßmann, M. Lorenz, P. Gerbert, M. Waldner, J. Justus, P. Engel, M. Harnisch (2015)
Industry 4.0 -
Mario Hermann, Tobias Pentek, B. Otto (2016)
Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS)
-
H. Kagermann, W. Wahlster, J. Helbig (2013)
Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative Industrie 4.0 -
Björn Asdecker, Vanessa Felch (2018)
Development of an Industry 4.0 maturity model for the delivery process in supply chainsJournal of Modelling in Management
-
Shiyong Wang, J. Wan, Di Li, Chunhua Zhang (2016)
Implementing Smart Factory of Industrie 4.0: An OutlookInternational Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 12
-
Frank Rennung, C. Luminosu, A. Draghici (2016)
Service Provision in the Framework of Industry 4.0Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 221
-
P. O'Donovan, K. Bruton, D. O’Sullivan (2020)
IAMM: A Maturity Model for Measuring Industrial Analytics Capabilities in Large-scale Manufacturing Facilities, 7
-
M. Porter, J. Heppelmann (2015)
How Smart, Connected Products Are Transforming Companies -
Sarra Mamoghli, L. Cassivi, Sylvie Trudel (2018)
Supporting business processes through human and IT factors: a maturity modelBus. Process. Manag. J., 24
- Publisher
- Emerald Publishing
- Copyright
- © Emerald Publishing Limited
- ISSN
- 1741-038X
- DOI
- 10.1108/jmtm-09-2018-0284
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
In recent years, the development and application of innovative and disruptive technologies in manufacturing environments is shaping the fourth industrial revolution, also known as Industry 4.0. The purpose of this paper is to describe a tool to assess the maturity level in implementing Industry 4.0 concepts and technologies in manufacturing companies.Design/methodology/approachUsing a framework to develop maturity models found in literature, three main steps were taken: the model design from the literature review on industry 4.0 and the comparative analysis of existing models; interviews with engineers and managers of relevant industries; and pilot tests in two relevant industrial companies.FindingsThe proposed maturity model has 41 variables considering five dimensions (organizational strategy, structure and culture; workforce; smart factories; smart processes; smart products and services). The studied companies showed different levels of Industry 4.0 implementation. According to respondents, the model is useful in making an initial diagnosis and establishes a roadmap to proceed the implementation.Practical implicationsEmpirical evidence supports the relevance of the proposed model and its practical usefulness. It can be used to measure the current state (initial diagnostic and monitoring assessments), and to plan the future desired state (goal), identifying which transformational capabilities should be developed.Originality/valueThe literature review did not return an enough complete maturity model to guide a self-administered assessment. Therefore, the proposed model is a valuable tool for companies and researchers to understand the I4.0 phenomenon, plan and monitor the transformation actions.
Journal
Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Dec 9, 2019
Keywords: Manufacturing technology; Digital transformation; Industry 4.0; Capabilities; Maturity model