Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
David Whiteside, Laurie Barclay (2013)
Echoes of Silence: Employee Silence as a Mediator Between Overall Justice and Employee OutcomesJournal of Business Ethics, 116
Brent Scott, J. Colquitt, Cindy Zapata-Phelan (2007)
Justice as a dependent variable: subordinate charisma as a predictor of interpersonal and informational justice perceptions.The Journal of applied psychology, 92 6
B. Tepper, E. Taylor (2003)
Relationships among Supervisors' and Subordinates' Procedural Justice Perceptions and Organizational Citizenship BehaviorsAcademy of Management Journal, 46
Maureen Ambrose, Anke Arnaud (2005)
Are Procedural Justice and Distributive Justice Conceptually Distinct
M.L. Ambrose, M. Schminke (2006)
The role of overall fairness judgments in organizational justice research
Maureen Ambrose, Marshall Schminke (2009)
The role of overall justice judgments in organizational justice research: a test of mediation.The Journal of applied psychology, 94 2
J. Colquitt (2001)
On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure.The Journal of applied psychology, 86 3
Pascal Langevin, Carla Mendoza (2014)
The impact of results control on affective organizational commitment: the mediating effects of perceived procedural justice, 20
R. Cropanzano, Zinta Byrne, D. Bobocel, D. Rupp (2001)
Moral Virtues, Fairness Heuristics, Social Entities, and Other Denizens of Organizational Justice.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58
E. Lind (2001)
Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations.
L. Porter, Richard Steers, R. Mowday, Paul Boulian (1974)
Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians.Journal of Applied Psychology, 59
D. Rupp, Karl Aquino (2009)
Nothing So Practical as a Good Justice TheoryIndustrial and Organizational Psychology, 2
J. Coyle-Shapiro, L. Shore (2007)
The employee–organization relationship: Where do we go from here?Human Resource Management Review, 17
Maureen Ambrose, Marshall Schminke, David Mayer (2013)
Trickle-down effects of supervisor perceptions of interactional justice: a moderated mediation approach.The Journal of applied psychology, 98 4
Hayfaa Tlaiss, A. Elamin (2015)
Exploring organizational trust and organizational justice among junior and middle managers in Saudi ArabiaJournal of Management Development, 34
Raymond Loi, Jennifer Lai, L. Lam (2012)
Working under a committed boss: A test of the relationship between supervisors' and subordinates' affective commitmentLeadership Quarterly, 23
Jerald Greenberg (2001)
Setting the Justice Agenda: Seven Unanswered Questions about “What, Why, and How”Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58
R. Mushtaq, Usman Raja, Mo Khan (2017)
Unpacking the combined effects of job scope and supervisor support on in-role performanceJournal of Management Development, 36
J. Colquitt, Jerald Greenberg, Brent Scott (2005)
Organizational Justice: Where Do We Stand?
R. Cropanzano, Maureen Ambrose (2001)
Procedural and distributive justice are more similar than you think: A monistic perspective and a research agenda.
D. Levy, B. Collins, P. Nail (1998)
A new model of interpersonal influence characteristics.Journal of Social Behavior and Personality
S. Aryee, Fred Walumbwa, Reuben Mondejar, Chris Chu (2014)
Accounting for the Influence of Overall Justice on Job Performance: Integrating Self‐Determination and Social Exchange TheoriesORG: Other Innovation & Organizational Behavior (Topic)
B. Tepper, M. Duffy, Christine Henle, L. Lambert (2006)
PROCEDURAL INJUSTICE, VICTIM PRECIPITATION, AND ABUSIVE SUPERVISIONPersonnel Psychology, 59
K. Bos, E. Lind (2004)
Fairness heuristic theory is an empirical framework: a reply to Arnadóttir.Scandinavian journal of psychology, 45 3
D. Rupp, Ruodan Shao, Kisha Jones, H. Liao (2014)
The utility of a multifoci approach to the study of organizational justice: A meta-analytic investigation into the consideration of normative rules, moral accountability, bandwidth-fidelity, and social exchangeOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123
D. Jones, Martin Martens (2008)
The mediating role of overall fairness and the moderating role of trust certainty in justice–criteria relationships: the formation and use of fairness heuristics in the workplaceJournal of Organizational Behavior, 30
P. Podsakoff, Scott MacKenzie, Jeong-Yeon Lee, Nathan Podsakoff (2003)
Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.The Journal of applied psychology, 88 5
Steinvör Arnadóttir (2002)
Fairness heuristic theory: valid but not empirical.Scandinavian journal of psychology, 43 4
Pascal Langevin, C. Mendoza (2014)
L'effet du contrôle par les résultats sur l'engagement organisationnel affectif : Le rôle médiateur de la justice procédurale perçue, 20
The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between supervisor’s overall justice and affective organizational commitment. The authors further study how this relationship is moderated by subordinates’ overall justice.Design/methodology/approachThe authors conducted hierarchical regression analyses on a sample of supervisor–subordinate matched data.FindingsSupervisors’ overall justice was positively related to supervisors’ affective organizational commitment, and subordinates’ overall justice moderated these relationships.Research limitations/implicationsThe main limitation of the study was its cross-sectional nature.Practical implicationsResults emphasized the importance of the interaction between supervisors’ and subordinates’ perceived overall justice, which suggests that employers should focus on treating all individuals fairly in the workplace.Originality/valueThe study contributes to the organizational justice literature by providing empirical evidence using a supervisor–subordinate matched sample, suggesting that overall justice is important to understanding individuals’ affective organizational commitment. Using fairness heuristic theory, the study explores the interaction effect of subordinates’ overall justice on the relationship between supervisors’ overall justice and affective organizational commitment.
Journal of Management Development – Emerald Publishing
Published: Sep 18, 2018
Keywords: Affective organizational commitment; Subordinates’ overall justice; Supervisors’ overall justice
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.