Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Moore (1995)
Creating public value : strategic management in government
Iestyn Williams, Suzanne Robinson, H. Dickinson (2011)
Rationing In Health Care: The Theory and Practice of Priority Setting
P. Dolan, R. Cookson, B. Ferguson (1999)
Effect of discussion and deliberation on the public's views of priority setting in health care: focus group studyBMJ, 318
Iestyn Williams (2013)
Institutions, cost-effectiveness analysis and healthcare rationing: the example of healthcare coverage in the English National Health ServicePolicy and Politics, 41
S. Wait, E. Nolte (2006)
Public involvement policies in health: exploring their conceptual basisHealth Economics, Policy and Law, 1
M. Jelinek (1993)
Managing change for competitive success
Ceasar Douglas, Anthony Ammeter (2004)
An examination of leader political skill and its effect on ratings of leader effectivenessLeadership Quarterly, 15
H. Rittel, M. Webber (1973)
Dilemmas in a general theory of planningPolicy Sciences, 4
M. Yeo, John Williams, W. Hooper (2004)
Incorporating Ethics in Priority Setting: A Case Study of a Regional Health Board in CanadaHealth Care Analysis, 7
Ross MacKenzie, S. Chapman, G. Salkeld, Simon Holding (2008)
Media influence on Herceptin subsidization in Australia: application of the rule of rescue?Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 101
G. Mooney (1998)
"Communitarian claims" as an ethical basis for allocating health care resources.Social science & medicine, 47 9
H. Dickinson, T. Freeman, Suzanne Robinson, Iestyn Williams (2011)
Resource scarcity and priority-setting: from management to leadership in the rationing of health care?Public Money & Management, 31
N. Daniels, J. Sabin (2008)
Setting Limits Fairly: Learning to Share Resources for Health
W. Kondro, B. Sibbald (2005)
Patient demand and politics push Herceptin forwardCanadian Medical Association Journal, 173
K. Syrett (2003)
A Technocratic Fix to the "Legitimacy Problem"? The Blair Government and Health Care Rationing in the United KingdomJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 28
K. Weick (2021)
FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONSThe New Economic Sociology
David Reeleder, V. Goel, P. Singer, Douglas Martin (2006)
Leadership and priority setting: the perspective of hospital CEOs.Health policy, 79 1
N. Smith, C. Mitton, Alan Davidson, Iestyn Williams (2014)
A politics of priority setting: Ideas, interests and institutions in healthcare resource allocationPublic Policy and Administration, 29
C. Ham, S. Pickard (1998)
Tragic Choices in Health Care: The Case of Child B
S. Sibbald, P. Singer, Ross Upshur, Douglas Martin (2009)
Priority setting: what constitutes success? A conceptual framework for successful priority settingBMC Health Services Research, 9
Iestyn Williams, D. Phillips, C. Nicholson, Heather Shearer (2014)
Evaluation of a deliberative approach to citizen involvement in health care priority settingLeadership in Health Services, 27
R. Whitaker (1996)
Managing context in enterprise knowledge processesEuropean Management Journal, 14
Ricardo Blaug, Louise Horner, R. Lekhi (2006)
Public value, citizen expectations and user commitment: a literature review
A. Litva, J. Coast, J. Donovan, J. Eyles, M. Shepherd, J. Tacchi, J. Abelson, Kieran Morgan (2002)
'The public is too subjective': public involvement at different levels of health-care decision making.Social science & medicine, 54 12
Mark Suchman (1995)
Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional ApproachesAcademy of Management Review, 20
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to take forward consideration of context in health care priority setting and to offer some practical strategies for priority setters to increase receptiveness to their work. Design/methodology/approach – A number of tools and methods have been devised with the aim of making health care priority setting more robust and evidence based. However, in order to routinely take and implement priority setting decisions, decision makers require the support, or at least the acquiescence, of key external parties. In other words, the priority setting process requires a receptive context if it is to proceed unhindered. Findings – The priority setting process requires a receptive context if it is to proceed unhindered. Originality/value – This paper develops the concept of legitimacy in the “authorising environment” in priority setting and describes strategies which might help decision makers to create a receptive context, and to manage relationships with external stakeholders.
Journal of Health Organisation and Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Sep 21, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.