Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Aileen Moreton-Robinson (2015)
The White Possessive: Property, Power, and Indigenous Sovereignty
Sanford Berman (1971)
Prejudices and Antipathies: A Tract on the LC Subject Heads Concerning People
E.T. Kim (2019)
The Passamaquoddy reclaim their culture through digital repatriation
L. Sill (2007)
Introduction to Cataloging and ClassificationLibrary Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 31
Jane Anderson (2013)
Anxieties of authorship in the colonial archive
(2014)
The quest to integrate the world’s knowledge: American archival engagement with the documentation movement 1900–1950
Jennifer Schultz, S. Rainie (2014)
The Strategic Power of Data: A Key Aspect of SovereigntyInternational Indigenous Policy Journal, 5
吕一旭 Lu (2009)
引言 (Introduction)Provincial China
Rebecca Green (2015)
Indigenous Peoples in the U.S., Sovereign Nations, and the DDCKnowledge Organization, 5
(2019)
Is it possible to decolonize the commons? An interview with Jane Anderson of Local Contexts
Christina Pacheco, S. Daley, Travis Brown, Melissa Filippi, K. Greiner, Christine Daley (2013)
Moving forward: breaking the cycle of mistrust between American Indians and researchers.American journal of public health, 103 12
Emily Drabinski (2013)
Queering the Catalog: Queer Theory and the Politics of CorrectionThe Library Quarterly, 83
P. Toner (2004)
History, memory and music: The repatriation of digital audio to Yolngu communities, or, memory as metadata
Y. Roubideaux (2002)
Perspectives on American Indian health.American journal of public health, 92 9
Kimberly Christen (2015)
Tribal Archives, Traditional Knowledge, and Local Contexts: Why the “s” Matters, 6
J. Furner (2007)
Dewey deracialized: A critical race-theoretic perspectiveKnowledge Organization, 34
T. Kukutai, John Taylor (2016)
Data sovereignty for indigenous peoples: current practice and future needs
(2019)
The Passamaquoddy reclaim their culture through digital repatriation ” , The New Yorker
S. Rainie, Jennifer Schultz, E. Briggs, Patricia Riggs, N. Palmanteer-Holder (2017)
Data as a Strategic Resource: Self-determination, Governance, and the Data Challenge for Indigenous Nations in the United StatesInternational Indigenous Policy Journal, 8
Linda Smith (2000)
Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples
(2017)
Policy Brief (Version 2): Data Governance for Native Nation Rebuilding
Anne Gilliland-Swetland, Sue McKemmish (2012)
Recordkeeping Metadata, the Archival Multiverse, and Societal Grand Challenges
(2006)
Cultural Protocols: A Framework, Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies
Jane Anderson (2009)
Colonial) Archives and (Copyright) Law
Marika Cifor, Jamie Lee (2017)
Towards an Archival Critique: Opening Possibilities for Addressing Neoliberalism in the Archival Field, 1
(2015)
Metadata, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
(2015)
Unpublished Grant Application, National Endowment of the Humanities, Tier II Advanced Implementation Research and Development, Division of Preservation and Access
J. Crawford (2021)
Setting the stage.The New England journal of medicine, 280 26
L. Hajibayova, Wayne Buente (2017)
Representation of indigenous cultures: considering the Hawaiian hulaJ. Documentation, 73
Jane Anderson, Kimberly Christen (2013)
‘Chuck a Copyright on it’: Dilemmas of Digital Return and the Possibilities for Traditional Knowledge Licenses and LabelsMuseum Anthropology Review, 7
Jane Anderson, María Montenegro (2017)
Collaborative encounters in digital cultural property
(2017)
Investigating socio-cultural aspects of the implementation of an international archival descriptive standard in Korea
Sandra Littletree, Cheryl Metoyer (2015)
Knowledge Organization from an Indigenous Perspective: The Mashantucket Pequot Thesaurus of American Indian Terminology ProjectCataloging & Classification Quarterly, 53
Melissa Adler (2017)
Cruising the Library: Perversities in the Organization of Knowledge
Heather MacNeil, W. Duff, Alicia Dotiwalla, Karolina Zuchniak (2018)
“If there are no records, there is no narrative”: the social justice impact of records of Scottish care-leaversArchival Science, 18
W. Duff, V. Harris (2002)
Stories and names: Archival description as narrating records and constructing meaningsArchival Science, 2
M. Duarte, Miranda Belarde-Lewis (2015)
Imagining: Creating Spaces for Indigenous OntologiesCataloging & Classification Quarterly, 53
C. Snipp (2016)
What does data sovereignty imply: what does it look like?
J. Mai (2016)
Marginalization and Exclusion: Unraveling Systemic Bias in ClassificationKnowledge Organization, 43
Saira Mohamed (2007)
The United Nations Declaration on the RIGHTS of Indigenous Peoples and Cal v. Attorney General, Supreme Court of BelizeInternational Legal Materials, 46
D. Rodriguez-Lonebear (2016)
Building a data revolution in Indian country
William Schultz (2018)
Information and SocietyJournal of Web Librarianship, 12
Jane Anderson (2018)
Negotiating Who "Owns" Penobscot CultureAnthropological Quarterly, 91
Amy Lonetree (2012)
Decolonizing Museums: Representing Native America in National and Tribal Museums
Jung-ran Park, Eric Childress (2009)
Dublin Core metadata semantics: an analysis of the perspectives of information professionalsJournal of Information Science, 35
Kristen Carpenter, Sonia Katyal, A. Riley (2011)
In Defense of PropertyProperty
Hope Olson (2001)
The Power to Name: Representation in Library CatalogsSigns: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 26
R. Srinivasan, Katherine Becvar, R. Boast, Jim Enote (2010)
Diverse Knowledges and Contact Zones within the Digital MuseumScience, Technology, & Human Values, 35
G. Bowker, S. Star (1999)
Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences
Kimberly Christen (2011)
Opening Archives: Respectful RepatriationAmerican Archivist
Saira Mohamed (2007)
Introductory Note To the United Nations Declaration On the Rights of Indigenous PeoplesInternational legal materials, 46
Jane Anderson, María Montenegro (2017)
Collaborative encounters in digital cultural property: Tracing temporal relationships of context and locality
The New Yorker, available at: www.newyorker.com/culture/culture-desk/thepassamaquoddy-reclaimtheir-culture-through-digital-repatriation
S. Farnel, Ali Shiri, Sandy Campbell, C. Cockney, Dinesh Rathi, Robyn Stobbs (2017)
A Community-Driven Metadata Framework for Describing Cultural Resources: The Digital Library North ProjectCataloging & Classification Quarterly, 55
Elaine Svenonius (2000)
The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization
Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 53
Marie Battiste (2008)
Research Ethics for Protecting Indigenous Knowledge and Heritage: Institutional and Researcher Responsibilities
K. Rothschild (2016)
In Defense Of Property
E. Duval (2001)
Metadata Standards: What, Who & WhyJ. Univers. Comput. Sci., 7
Linda Smith (2015)
Imagining Our Own ApproachesCataloging & Classification Quarterly, 53
Margaret Vega (2015)
Community-Based Archaeology: Research with, by, and for Indigenous and Local CommunitiesJournal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 19
(2015)
Local Contexts 2.0
Nancy Fraser (2017)
Contingent Foundations: Feminism and the Question of "Postmodernism"
Jodi Bruhn (2014)
Identifying Useful Approaches to the Governance of Indigenous DataInternational Indigenous Policy Journal, 5
Kimberly Christen (2018)
Relationships, Not Records
C. Crothers (2014)
Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous PeoplesEthnic and Racial Studies, 37
Geir Grenersen (2012)
What is a document institution? A case study from the South Sámi communityJ. Documentation, 68
G. Brilmyer (2018)
Archival assemblages: applying disability studies’ political/relational model to archival descriptionArchival Science, 18
(2007)
A forum for indigenous culture building and preservation
M. Torsen, Jane Anderson (2011)
Intellectual property and the safeguarding of traditional cultures
Karuk Tribe, Lisa Hillman, Leaf Hillman, Adrienne Harling, B. Talley, A. McLaughlin (2017)
Building Sípnuuk: A Digital Library, Archives, and Museum for Indigenous PeoplesCollection Management, 42
T. Kukutai, John Taylor (2016)
Indigenous Data Sovereignty: Toward an agenda
M. Torsen, Jane Anderson (2010)
Intellectual Property and the Safeguarding of Traditional Cultures: Legal Issues and Practical Options for Museums, Libraries and Archives
Ângela Mestre (2009)
Generating connected and 2-edge connected graphsJ. Graph Algorithms Appl., 13
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the underlying meanings, effects and cultural patterns of metadata standards, focusing on Dublin Core (DC), and explore the ways in which anticolonial metadata tools can be applied to exercise and promote Indigenous data sovereignty.Design/methodology/approachApplying an anticolonial approach, this paper examines the assumptions underpinning the stated roles of two of DC’s metadata elements, rights and creator. Based on that examination, the paper considers the limitations of DC for appropriately documenting Indigenous traditional knowledge (TK). Introduction of the TK labels and their implementation are put forward as an alternative method to such limitations in metadata standards.FindingsThe analysis of the rights and creator elements revealed that DC’s universality and supposed neutrality threaten the rightful attribution, specificity and dynamism of TK, undermining Indigenous data sovereignty. The paper advocates for alternative descriptive methods grounded within tribal sovereignty values while recognizing the difficulties of dealing with issues of interoperability by means of metadata standards given potentially innate tendencies to customization within communities.Originality/valueThis is the first paper to directly examine the implications of DC’s rights and creator elements for documenting TK. The paper identifies ethical practices and culturally appropriate tools that unsettle the universality claims of metadata standards. By introducing the TK labels, the paper contributes to the efforts of Indigenous communities to regain control and ownership of their cultural and intellectual property.
Journal of Documentation – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 21, 2019
Keywords: Traditional knowledge; Dublin Core; Metadata standards; Indigenous communities; Indigenous data sovereignty; TK labels; Universality
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.