Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Renegotiations – empirical analysis of impacts on business relationships

Renegotiations – empirical analysis of impacts on business relationships <jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Purpose</jats:title> <jats:p>Renegotiations not only promise an economically relevant improvement of the original negotiation outcome for the communicator of the demand but also imply a potential threat to the business relationship. The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of renegotiations in detail and to provide practical implications for the optimal usage of renegotiations by analyzing potential renegotiation strategies.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Design/methodology/approach</jats:title> <jats:p>Structural equation modelling was used to analyze the data of 255 negotiation experts collected via a standardized online questionnaire.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Findings</jats:title> <jats:p>Social psychological outcome of renegotiations has the most relevant impact on relationship continuity (RC). The impact of economic outcomes is wholly mediated by the social psychological outcome. Regarding the use of different renegotiation strategies, other-oriented strategies and direct communication are most successful, whereas self-oriented strategies correlate negatively with all results.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Research limitations/implications</jats:title> <jats:p>The study’s sample is drawn from Germany, which requires careful consideration of the results’ generalizability.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Practical implications</jats:title> <jats:p>When demanding renegotiation, practitioners should apply strategies characterized by other-orientation and direct communication to increase the probability of RC. For the sake of the business relationship, self-oriented strategies should be avoided.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Originality/value</jats:title> <jats:p>This paper presents the first detailed analysis of the impact of renegotiations on business relationships and investigates the effects of different renegotiation strategies on renegotiation outcomes and RC; hence, it is of great value for practical usage and may serve as a stepping stone for further research.</jats:p> </jats:sec> http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing CrossRef

Renegotiations – empirical analysis of impacts on business relationships

Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing , Volume 32 (4): 541-552 – May 2, 2017

Renegotiations – empirical analysis of impacts on business relationships


Abstract

<jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Purpose</jats:title>
<jats:p>Renegotiations not only promise an economically relevant improvement of the original negotiation outcome for the communicator of the demand but also imply a potential threat to the business relationship. The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of renegotiations in detail and to provide practical implications for the optimal usage of renegotiations by analyzing potential renegotiation strategies.</jats:p>
</jats:sec>
<jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Design/methodology/approach</jats:title>
<jats:p>Structural equation modelling was used to analyze the data of 255 negotiation experts collected via a standardized online questionnaire.</jats:p>
</jats:sec>
<jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Findings</jats:title>
<jats:p>Social psychological outcome of renegotiations has the most relevant impact on relationship continuity (RC). The impact of economic outcomes is wholly mediated by the social psychological outcome. Regarding the use of different renegotiation strategies, other-oriented strategies and direct communication are most successful, whereas self-oriented strategies correlate negatively with all results.</jats:p>
</jats:sec>
<jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Research limitations/implications</jats:title>
<jats:p>The study’s sample is drawn from Germany, which requires careful consideration of the results’ generalizability.</jats:p>
</jats:sec>
<jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Practical implications</jats:title>
<jats:p>When demanding renegotiation, practitioners should apply strategies characterized by other-orientation and direct communication to increase the probability of RC. For the sake of the business relationship, self-oriented strategies should be avoided.</jats:p>
</jats:sec>
<jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Originality/value</jats:title>
<jats:p>This paper presents the first detailed analysis of the impact of renegotiations on business relationships and investigates the effects of different renegotiation strategies on renegotiation outcomes and RC; hence, it is of great value for practical usage and may serve as a stepping stone for further research.</jats:p>
</jats:sec>

Loading next page...
 
/lp/crossref/renegotiations-empirical-analysis-of-impacts-on-business-relationships-xTvb1ZbQSq

References (67)

Publisher
CrossRef
ISSN
0885-8624
DOI
10.1108/jbim-09-2015-0175
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

<jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Purpose</jats:title> <jats:p>Renegotiations not only promise an economically relevant improvement of the original negotiation outcome for the communicator of the demand but also imply a potential threat to the business relationship. The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of renegotiations in detail and to provide practical implications for the optimal usage of renegotiations by analyzing potential renegotiation strategies.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Design/methodology/approach</jats:title> <jats:p>Structural equation modelling was used to analyze the data of 255 negotiation experts collected via a standardized online questionnaire.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Findings</jats:title> <jats:p>Social psychological outcome of renegotiations has the most relevant impact on relationship continuity (RC). The impact of economic outcomes is wholly mediated by the social psychological outcome. Regarding the use of different renegotiation strategies, other-oriented strategies and direct communication are most successful, whereas self-oriented strategies correlate negatively with all results.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Research limitations/implications</jats:title> <jats:p>The study’s sample is drawn from Germany, which requires careful consideration of the results’ generalizability.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Practical implications</jats:title> <jats:p>When demanding renegotiation, practitioners should apply strategies characterized by other-orientation and direct communication to increase the probability of RC. For the sake of the business relationship, self-oriented strategies should be avoided.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Originality/value</jats:title> <jats:p>This paper presents the first detailed analysis of the impact of renegotiations on business relationships and investigates the effects of different renegotiation strategies on renegotiation outcomes and RC; hence, it is of great value for practical usage and may serve as a stepping stone for further research.</jats:p> </jats:sec>

Journal

Journal of Business and Industrial MarketingCrossRef

Published: May 2, 2017

There are no references for this article.