Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Spencer McKay, C. Tenove (2020)
Disinformation as a Threat to Deliberative DemocracyPolitical Research Quarterly, 74
Stefanie Walter, M. Brüggemann (2018)
Opportunity makes opinion leaders: analyzing the role of first-hand information in opinion leadership in social media networksInformation, Communication & Society, 23
M. Newman (2004)
Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's lawContemporary Physics, 46
Petter Törnberg (2018)
Echo chambers and viral misinformation: Modeling fake news as complex contagionPLoS ONE, 13
J. Hartigan, M. Wong (1979)
A k-means clustering algorithm
Elizabeth Dubois, S. Minaeian, Ariane Paquet-Labelle, Simon Beaudry (2020)
Who to Trust on Social Media: How Opinion Leaders and Seekers Avoid Disinformation and Echo ChambersSocial Media + Society, 6
D. Watts, P. Dodds (2007)
Influentials, Networks, and Public Opinion FormationJournal of Consumer Research, 34
Ahmed Al-Rawi (2018)
Gatekeeping Fake News Discourses on Mainstream Media Versus Social MediaSocial Science Computer Review, 37
Bairong Wang, J. Zhuang (2018)
Rumor response, debunking response, and decision makings of misinformed Twitter users during disastersNatural Hazards, 93
Liang Chen, Xiaohui Wang, Tai-Quan Peng (2018)
Nature and Diffusion of Gynecologic Cancer–Related Misinformation on Social Media: Analysis of TweetsJournal of Medical Internet Research, 20
Zhiwei Qin, Jian Cai, H. Wangchen (2015)
How Rumors Spread and Stop over Social Media: a Multi-Layered Communication Model and Empirical AnalysisCommun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 36
Karine Nahon (2015)
Where There is Social Media There is Politics
Sharon Meraz, Zizi Papacharissi (2013)
Networked Gatekeeping and Networked Framing on #EgyptThe International Journal of Press/Politics, 18
Vahed Qazvinian, Emily Rosengren, Dragomir Radev, Q. Mei (2011)
Rumor has it: Identifying Misinformation in Microblogs
Nicolas Anspach (2017)
The New Personal Influence: How Our Facebook Friends Influence the News We ReadPolitical Communication, 34
S. Cho, Kyujin Jung, H. Park (2013)
Social Media Use during Japan's 2011 Earthquake: How Twitter Transforms the Locus of Crisis CommunicationMedia International Australia, 149
Kjerstin Thorson, Chris Wells (2016)
Curated Flows: A Framework for Mapping Media Exposure in the Digital AgeCommunication Theory, 26
A. Zeileis, F. Leisch, K. Hornik, Christian Kleiber (2002)
Strucchange: An R package for testing for structural change in linear regression modelsJournal of Statistical Software, 7
D. Diermeier, N. Contractor, David Huffaker (2010)
Dimensions of leadership and social influence in online communities
Kate Starbird, Jim Maddock, M. Orand, Peg Achterman, R. Mason (2014)
Rumors, False Flags, and Digital Vigilantes: Misinformation on Twitter after the 2013 Boston Marathon Bombing
M. Khosravinik, J. Unger (2016)
Critical Discourse Studies and Social Media: power, resistance and critique in changing media ecologies
(2020)
What is Antifa, the movement Trump wants to declare a terror group?
N. Pang, Joshua Ng (2017)
Misinformation in a riot: a two-step flow viewOnline Inf. Rev., 41
P. Bordia, N. DiFonzo (2004)
Problem Solving in Social Interactions on the Internet: Rumor As Social CognitionSocial Psychology Quarterly, 67
Stefan Stieglitz, D. Bunker, Milad Mirbabaie, Christian Ehnis (2018)
Sense‐Making in Social Media During Extreme EventsChange Management Strategy eJournal
W. Krzanowski, Y. Lai (1988)
A Criterion for Determining the Number of Groups in a Data Set Using Sum-of-Squares ClusteringBiometrics, 44
A. Bergström, Maria Belfrage (2018)
News in Social MediaDigital Journalism, 6
Brian Weeks, Alberto Ardévol-Abreu, H. Zúñiga (2015)
Online Influence? Social Media Use, Opinion Leadership, and Political PersuasionInternational Journal of Public Opinion Research, 29
(2019)
The El Paso and Dayton shootings show how disinformation spreads on messaging apps
(2021)
Combating misinformation in risk: emotional appeal in false beliefs
Peter Smith (2005)
Knowledge sharing and strategic capitalThe Learning Organization, 12
A. Roguet, A. Eren, Ryan Newton, S. McLellan (2018)
Fecal source identification using random forestMicrobiome, 6
J. Turcotte, Chance York, Jacob Irving, Rosanne Scholl, Raymond Pingree (2015)
News Recommendations from Social Media Opinion Leaders: Effects on Media Trust and Information SeekingJ. Comput. Mediat. Commun., 20
S. McCreery, Brian Britt, Jameson Hayes (2021)
Social TV and the WWE: Exploring the fan-to-brand relationship in a highly engaged, live-viewing, interactive online spaceConvergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 28
(2019)
Fact-checking misinformation after the El Paso, Dayton shootings
J. Taarup-Esbensen (2018)
Making Sense of Risk—A Sociological Perspective on the Management of RiskRisk Analysis, 39
Yang Yang, Yuxiao Dong, N. Chawla (2014)
Predicting Node Degree Centrality with the Node Prominence ProfileScientific Reports, 4
Jiyoung Lee, Shaheen Kanthawala, Brian Britt, Danielle Deavours, Tanya Ott-Fulmore (2021)
Prevalence of anger, engaged in sadness: engagement in misinformation, correction, and emotional tweets during mass shootingsOnline Inf. Rev., 46
Briony Swire, Ullrich Ecker (2018)
ELEVEN Misinformation and Its Correction: Cognitive Mechanisms and Recommendations for Mass CommunicationMisinformation and Mass Audiences
E. Rogers (1964)
Diffusion of innovationsEncyclopedia of Sport Management
Misinformation (i.e. information identified as false) spreads widely and quickly on social media – a space where crowds of ordinary citizens can become leading voices – during a crisis when information is in short supply. Using the theoretical lenses of socially curated flow and networked gatekeeping frameworks, we address the following three aims: First, we identify emergent opinion leaders in misinformation-related conversations on social media. Second, we explore distinct groups that contribute to online discourses about misinformation. Lastly, we investigate the actual dominance of misinformation within disparate groups in the early phases of mass shooting crises.Design/methodology/approachThis paper used network and cluster analyses of Twitter data that focused on the four most prevalent misinformation themes surrounding the El Paso mass shooting.FindingsA total of seven clusters of users emerged, which were classified into five categories: (1) boundary-spanning hubs, (2) broadly popular individuals, (3) reputation-building hubs, (4) locally popular individuals and (5) non-opinion leaders. Additionally, a content analysis of 128 tweets in six clusters, excluding the cluster of non-opinion leaders, further demonstrated that the opinion leaders heavily focused on reiterating and propagating misinformation (102 out of 128 tweets) and collectively made zero corrective tweets.Originality/valueThese findings expand the intellectual understanding of how various types of opinion leaders can shape the flow of (mis)information in a crisis. Importantly, this study provides new insights into the role of trans-boundary opinion leaders in creating an echo chamber of misinformation by serving as bridges between otherwise fragmented discourses.
Internet Research – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 14, 2023
Keywords: Opinion leader; Socially curated flow theory; Misinformation; Network analysis; Cluster analysis
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.