Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Acemoglu, Simon Johnson (2006)
Disease and Development: The Effect of Life Expectancy on Economic GrowthJournal of Political Economy, 115
Steven Heine, D. Lehman, K. Peng, J. Greenholtz (2002)
What's wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales?: The reference-group effect.Journal of personality and social psychology, 82 6
R. Fischer (2012)
Value Isomorphism in the European Social SurveyJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43
C. Murray, Alan Lopez (1996)
Evidence-Based Health Policy--Lessons from the Global Burden of Disease StudyScience, 274
Y. Ng (1997)
A Case for Happiness, Cardinalism, and Interpersonal ComparabilityMicroeconomic Theory eJournal
B. Vanhoutte, Vanhoutte Bram, J. Field, R. Burke, C. Cooper (2013)
The measurement of multiple dimensions of subjective well-being in later life
E. Diener (2000)
Subjective well-being. The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index.The American psychologist, 55 1
A. Kerkhof (2012)
Calculating the burden of disease of suicide, attempted suicide, and suicide ideation by estimating disability weights.Crisis, 33 2
F. Vijver, K. Leung (2000)
Methodological Issues in Psychological Research on CultureJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31
Anne-Wil Harzing (2006)
Response Styles in Cross-national Survey ResearchInternational Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 6
Stephanie Grimm, A. Church (1999)
A Cross-Cultural Study of Response Biases in Personality Measures☆Journal of Research in Personality, 33
R. Cattell (1950)
The Principal Culture Patterns Discoverable in the Syntal Dimensions of Existing NationsJournal of Social Psychology, 32
M. Menken, T. Munsat, J. Toole (2000)
The global burden of disease study: implications for neurology.Archives of neurology, 57 3
M. Wolfson (1999)
Measuring health - visions and practicalitiesStatistical journal of the United Nations economic commission for Europe, 16
Ya-Ru Chen, K. Leung, Chao-chuan Chen (2009)
5 Bringing National Culture to the Table: Making a Difference with Cross‐cultural Differences and PerspectivesThe Academy of Management Annals, 3
A. Oswald, Stephen Wu (2010)
Objective Confirmation of Subjective Measures of Human Well-Being: Evidence from the U.S.A.Science, 327
K. Cook, D. Dranove, Andrew Sfekas (2010)
Does major illness cause financial catastrophe?Health services research, 45 2
M. Bond (1988)
Finding universal dimensions of individual variation in multicultural studies of values: The Rokeach and Chinese value surveys.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55
R. Cattell (1949)
The dimensions of culture patterns by factorization of national characters.Journal of abnormal psychology, 44 4
R. Fischer (2004)
Standardization to Account for Cross-Cultural Response BiasJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35
E. Diener, S. Oishi, Richard Lucas (2015)
National accounts of subjective well-being.The American psychologist, 70 3
E. Diener, E. Suh, Richard Lucas, Heidi Smith (1999)
Subjective Well-Being: Three Decades of ProgressPsychological Bulletin, 125
V. Kumar (2009)
Researching International Markets: Philosophical and Methodological Issues
.. Murray (1997)
Global burden of diseaseThe Lancet, 350
Gordon Cheung, Roger Rensvold (2000)
Assessing Extreme and Acquiescence Response Sets in Cross-Cultural Research Using Structural Equations ModelingJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31
C. Murray, Alan Lopez (1997)
Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990–2020: Global Burden of Disease StudyThe Lancet, 349
R. Jowell, M. Kaase, R. Fitzgerald, G. Eva (2011)
The European Social Survey as a measurement model
E. Diener, R. Inglehart, L. Tay (2013)
Theory and Validity of Life Satisfaction ScalesSocial Indicators Research, 112
L. Festinger (1954)
A Theory of Social Comparison ProcessesHuman Relations, 7
Purpose – Statistical indicators, such as human health, are important for designing government policies, as well as for influencing the functioning of economic markets. However, there is often a discrepancy between statistical measures and the citizens’ prevalent feelings. In order to produce more relevant indicators of social progress, governments are currently shifting their measurement emphasis from objective to subjective measures. While the philosophical tradition of hedonic psychology views individuals as the best judges of their own conditions, little empirical evidence shows that individually reported health scores provide accurate information about a population’s health status. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate if subjective health questions contain genuine information about the status of human health, and are meaningful at an aggregated level. Design/methodology/approach – Subjective health data are extracted from the 2012/2013 European Social Survey (28 European countries plus Israel, n =54,427). Objective health data are based on the 2012 World Bank statistics for life expectancy at birth. The author check if aggregated subjective health correlates with life expectancy at country level, and can reliably be compared across countries. Findings – The findings support the idea of including subjective data into country statistics of social progress. Because of substantial between-country differences, social development programs should be devised individually for each country. Originality/value – By showing that subjective health measures can reliably contribute to the quantification of social progress, the author offer a bridge between objective neoclassical economics and subjective hedonic psychology.
International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 11, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.