Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
The Times 100 Online Business Case Study
Using market research to support decision making: a JD Sports case study
Tien-Chin Wang, Yueh-Hsiang Chen (2008)
Applying fuzzy linguistic preference relations to the improvement of consistency of fuzzy AHPInf. Sci., 178
E.L. Brannon
Fashion Forecasting
Ch Lin, C. Twu (2012)
Combination of a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) with the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) for fashion design scheme evaluationTextile Research Journal, 82
T.L. Saaty
The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting
Gozde Goncu, N. Bayazit (2007)
An Application of AHP in the Selection of Fashion Trends for Specific Target GroupsDesign Principles and Practices: An International Journal, 1
S.J. Jones
Fashion Design
C.H. Lin
Delphi technique: constructing fashion design assessment rubrics
L. Kidd, J. Workman (1999)
Assessment of Creativity in Apparel DesignClothing and Textiles Research Journal, 17
S.J. Harr
Development of assessment rubrics for fashion design projects
E. Herrera-Viedma, F. Herrera, F. Chiclana, M. Luque (2004)
Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relationsEur. J. Oper. Res., 154
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to improve the complicated pairwise comparison problem and the consistency of analytic hierarchy process (AHP), the consistent fuzzy preference relation (CFPR) method is applied to select the best fashion design scheme in this study. Design/methodology/approach – The first stage is to review the traditional AHP for fashion design scheme evaluation. The second stage is based on the procedure of CFPR to select the best fashion design scheme. The procedure includes: establishment of the fuzzy preference relation matrix of pairwise comparisons, calculation of criteria weight, and calculation of the evaluation value for ratings of fashion design schemes with respect to criteria. The final stage is to compare the procedures and results between AHP and CFPR for the evaluations of fashion design schemes. Findings – For fashion design scheme selection, there are 76 data for fashion design scheme evaluation in AHP, but only 31 in CFPR. Comparing both AHP and CFPR methods, the rankings of the criteria weight are identical and the priority scores of the fashion design scheme are similar. The CFPR is more efficient than AHP, obviously, to solve the inconsistency of hierarchical decision‐making problem. Originality/value – This paper proposes the CFPR method for the selection of the best fashion design scheme. According to the finding of this study, the CFPR is proposed as a practicable option for solving complicated pairwise comparison problems in fashion design decision.
International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 29, 2014
Keywords: AHP; MCDM; CFPR; Design decision; Fashion design scheme
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.