Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Berke, M. Conroy (2000)
Are We Planning for Sustainable Development?Journal of the American Planning Association, 66
The Arup Journal, 36
R. Shipley, S. Utz, Michael Parsons (2006)
Does Adaptive Reuse Pay? A Study of the Business of Building Renovation in Ontario, CanadaInternational Journal of Heritage Studies, 12
Peter Bullen, P. Love (2011)
A new future for the past: a model for adaptive reuse decision-making, 1
P. Eisinger (2014)
Is Detroit Dead?Journal of Urban Affairs, 36
Elizabeth Mueller, S. Dooling (2011)
Sustainability and vulnerability: integrating equity into plans for central city redevelopmentJournal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 4
J. Allwood, M. Ashby, T. Gutowski, E. Worrell (2011)
Material efficiency: A white paperResources Conservation and Recycling, 55
J. Fitch (1985)
HISTORIC PRESERVATION: CURATORIAL MANAGEMENT OF THE BUILT WORLDLandscape Journal, 4
Peter Bullen, P. Love (2010)
The rhetoric of adaptive reuse or reality of demolition: Views from the fieldCities, 27
BPPPI/CMAP/MMC (2010)
How can municipalities confront the vacant property challenge?
Peter Bullen, P. Love (2011)
Factors influencing the adaptive re‐use of buildingsJournal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 9
Carey Addison, Sumei Zhang, Bradley Coomes (2013)
Smart Growth and Housing AffordabilityJournal of Planning Literature, 28
E. Burton, M. Jenks, K. Williams (2013)
The Potential of the Compact City for Promoting Social Equity
Martha Gault, E. Silver (2008)
Spuriousness or mediation? Broken windows according to Sampson and Raudenbush (1999)Journal of Criminal Justice, 36
J. Spangenberg (2004)
Reconciling sustainability and growth: criteria, indicators, policiesSustainable Development, 12
J. Wilson, G. Kelling (1982)
BROKEN WINDOWS: THE POLICE AND NEIGHBOURHOOD SAFETYThe Atlantic Monthly, 249
E. Zeemering (2009)
What Does Sustainability Mean to City Officials?Urban Affairs Review, 45
C. Langston, Francis Wong, E. Hui, Liyin Shen (2008)
Strategic assessment of building adaptive reuse opportunities in Hong KongBuilding and Environment, 43
Planning, 76
G. Kelling (1996)
Fixing broken windows: Restoring order and reducing crime in
A. Sev (2009)
How can the construction industry contribute to sustainable development? A conceptual frameworkSustainable Development, 17
T. Beatley, K. Manning (1997)
The Ecology of Place: Planning for Environment, Economy, and Community
M. Howland (2007)
Employment Effects of Brownfield Redevelopment: What Do We Know from the Literature?Journal of Planning Literature, 22
Journal of the Royal Society of Arts, 133
A. Savitz, K. Weber (2006)
The Triple Bottom Line: How Today's Best-Run Companies Are Achieving Economic, Social and Environmental Success -- and How You Can Too
N. Dempsey, G. Bramley, Sinéad Power, Caroline Brown (2011)
The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainabilitySustainable Development, 19
Sheila Conejos, C. Langston, Jim Smith (2015)
Enhancing sustainability through designing for adaptive reuse from the outset: A comparison of adaptstar and adaptive reuse potential (ARP) modelsFacilities, 33
C. Langston (2011)
Green Adaptive Reuse: Issues and Strategies for the Built Environment
Rayman Mohamed (2009)
Brownfields redevelopment: Can business incentives be justified and what are the implications for efficiency versus equity?The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences: Annual Review, 4
C. Langston (2008)
The sustainability implications of building adaptive reuse
D. Godschalk (2004)
Land Use Planning Challenges: Coping with Conflicts in Visions of Sustainable Development and Livable CommunitiesJournal of the American Planning Association, 70
C. Langston (2012)
Validation of the adaptive reuse potential (ARP) model using iconCURFacilities, 30
J. Jacobs (1962)
The Death and Life of Great American Cities
Peter Bullen (2007)
Adaptive reuse and sustainability of commercial buildingsFacilities, 25
S. Wilkinson, K. James, R. Reed (2009)
Using building adaptation to deliver sustainability in AustraliaStructural Survey, 27
Global Urban Development, 4
J. Elkington (2013)
Enter the Triple Bottom Line
J. Hollander (2010)
Moving Toward a Shrinking Cities Metric: Analyzing Land Use Changes Associated with Depopulation in Flint, MichiganProperty
G. Warren-Myers (2012)
Valuing Sustainability in Australia: Implications for the Valuation ProfessionPacific Rim Property Research Journal, 18
E. Yung, E. Chan (2012)
Implementation challenges to the adaptive reuse of heritage buildings: Towards the goals of sustainable, low carbon citiesHabitat International, 36
S. Wilkinson, K. James, R. Reed (2009)
Delivering sustainability through the adaptive reuse of commercial buildings : the Melbourne CBD challenge
C. Sousa, Changshan Wu, Lynne Westphal (2009)
Assessing the Effect of Publicly Assisted Brownfield Redevelopment on Surrounding Property ValuesEconomic Development Quarterly, 23
E. Kurul (2007)
A qualitative approach to exploring adaptive re‐use processesFacilities, 25
P. Berke (2002)
Does Sustainable Development Offer a New Direction for Planning? Challenges for the Twenty-First CenturyJournal of Planning Literature, 17
I. Seeley (1972)
Building Economics: Appraisal and Control of Building Design Cost and Efficiency
Sheila Conejos, C. Langston, Jim Smith (2011)
Improving the implementation of adaptive reuse strategies for historic buildings
Peter Bullen, P. Love (2009)
Residential regeneration and adaptive reuse: learning from the experiences of Los AngelesStructural Survey, 27
Anne Power (2008)
Does demolition or refurbishment of old and inefficient homes help to increase our environmental, social and economic viability?Energy Policy, 36
E. Brooks, A. Law, Lingjiang Huang (2014)
A comparative analysis of retrofitting historic buildings for energy efficiency in the UK and ChinadisP - The Planning Review, 50
C. Grodach (2011)
Barriers to sustainable economic development : the Dallas–Fort Worth experienceScience & Engineering Faculty
B. Ratner (2004)
“Sustainability” as a Dialogue of Values: Challenges to the Sociology of DevelopmentSociological Inquiry, 74
E. Choi (2010)
Ustification of Public Subsidy: Externality Effects of a Historic Church Reuse Project on Neighborhood Housing Sale Prices in Cleveland, OhioInternational Review of Public Administration, 15
K. Lynch, L. Popelová, Jaroslav Huťa (1960)
Image of the city
J. Fernández (2003)
Design for change: Part 1: diversified lifetimesArchitectural Research Quarterly, 7
S. Wilkinson (2012)
Analysing sustainable retrofit potential in premium office buildingsStructural Survey, 30
Sophie Cantell (2005)
The Adaptive Reuse of Historic Industrial Buildings: Regulation Barriers, Best Practices and Case Studies
Sheila Conejos, C. Langston, Jim Smith (2013)
AdaptSTAR model: A climate-friendly strategy to promote built environment sustainabilityHabitat International, 37
Junxiao Liu, Chunlu Liu (2012)
Investigating the Housing Market Fluctuation Under an Expansionary Monetary Policy in AustraliaPacific Rim Property Research Journal, 18
Scott Campbell (1996)
Green Cities, Growing Cities, Just Cities? Urban Planning and the Contradictions of Sustainable
PurposeThere is a resurgence in the adaptive reuse of buildings. However, there is a lack of literature that pulls all the strands of adaptive reuse together. Furthermore, despite claims that it is motivated by the 3 Es of the sustainability triangle, the authors could find no research that critiques adaptive reuse from this perspective. The purpose of this study is to review the literature to collect pertinent information in a single place and to critically examine whether adaptive reuse incorporates the 3 Es of sustainability.Design/methodology/approachThe methodological approach of this study is a literature review and a critical analysis of the practice of adaptive review.FindingsAdaptive reuse is concentrated at the environment and economic development corners of the sustainability triangle. There are positive interactions along this edge. The authors attribute this to the fact that the same actors – the private and public sectors – are located at both corners of the triangle, and they have shared interests. This is different from the wider sustainability literature, where major actors at each corner are different and tensions along each edge are resolved through mediation. In adaptive reuse, there are no actors at the equity corner of the triangle, and there are minimal attempts to address concerns along the equity–environment and equity–economic development edges of the triangle.Research limitations/implicationsThis study focuses on the USA.Practical implicationsThis study suggests policy interventions that address the equity issue in adaptive reuse.Originality/valueThis is the first study to provide a succinct review of contemporary adaptive reuse and that places the practice within the framework of the 3 Es of sustainability.
Facilities – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 7, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.