Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Bertot, P. Jaeger, J. Grimes (2010)
Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societiesGov. Inf. Q., 27
Abdul Majid, Ling Chen, Gencai Chen, Hamid Mirza, Ibrar Hussain, J. Woodward
International Journal of Geographical Information Science a Context-aware Personalized Travel Recommendation System Based on Geotagged Social Media Data Mining a Context-aware Personalized Travel Recommendation System Based on Geotagged Social Media Data Mining
P. van Kessel (2014)
Big data: changing the way businesses compete and operate
D. Laney (2013)
Big dataGartner Blog Network
지영민, 유준재, 이상학 (2017)
[특집원고] IoT, 빅데이터 그리고 인공지능, 35
(2015)
Data quality dimensions metrics
(2016)
Briefing paper on open data and data quality
A. Ngomo, S. Auer, Jens Lehmann, A. Zaveri (2013)
Introduction to Linked Data and Its Lifecycle on the Web
G. Otto (2016)
Study: PDF, HTML files dominate data.gov
(2017)
A study on policy implication of platform for open data
M. Hausenblas (2012)
Five star open data
(2018)
Five stars of open data
Maxat Kassen (2013)
A promising phenomenon of open data: A case study of the Chicago open data projectGov. Inf. Q., 30
A. Vetrò, L. Canova, Marco Torchiano, Camilo Minotas, R. Iemma, Federico Morando (2016)
Open data quality measurement framework: Definition and application to Open Government DataGov. Inf. Q., 33
(2018)
Open data fromats
International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27
Aikaterini Yannoukakou, Iliana Araka (2014)
Access to Government Information: Right to Information and Open Government Data Synergy☆Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 147
Behshid Behkamal, M. Kahani, E. Bagheri, Z. Jeremic (2014)
A Metrics-Driven Approach for Quality Assessment of Linked Open DataJ. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res., 9
C. Reddick, J. Roy (2013)
Business perceptions and satisfaction with e-government: Findings from a Canadian surveyGov. Inf. Q., 30
(2018)
ODB Global Report
Amg Eijk, M. Janssen (2015)
Participation and Data Quality in Open Data use: Open Data Infrastructures Evaluated
(2013)
Open data: barriers, risks and opportunities
Pieter Verdegem, G. Verleye (2009)
User-centered E-Government in practice: A comprehensive model for measuring user satisfactionGov. Inf. Q., 26
(2018)
About data.gov
C. Batini, C. Cappiello, C. Francalanci, A. Maurino (2009)
Methodologies for data quality assessment and improvementACM Comput. Surv., 41
Chris Martin (2014)
Barriers to the Open Government Data Agenda: Taking a Multi-Level PerspectivePolicy & Internet, 6
The use of “open data” can help the public find value in various areas of interests. Many governments have created and published a huge amount of open data; however, people have a hard time using open data because of data quality issues. The UK, the USA and Korea have created and published open data; however, the rate of open data implementation and level of open data impact is very low because of data quality issues like incompatible data formats and incomplete data. This study aims to compare the statuses of data quality from open government sites in the UK, the USA and Korea and also present guidelines for publishing data format and enhancing data completeness.Design/methodology/approachThis study uses statistical analysis of different data formats and examination of data completeness to explore key issues of data quality in open government data.FindingsFindings show that the USA and the UK have published more than 50 per cent of open data in level one. Korea has published 52.8 per cent of data in level three. Level one data are not machine-readable; therefore, users have a hard time using them. The level one data are found in portable document format and hyper text markup language (HTML) and are locked up in documents; therefore, machines cannot extract out the data. Findings show that incomplete data are existing in all three governments’ open data.Originality/valueGovernments should investigate data incompleteness of all open data and correct incomplete data of the most used data. Governments can find the most used data easily by monitoring data sets that have been downloaded most frequently over a certain period.
The Electronic Library – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 15, 2019
Keywords: Quality; Open data; Open government data; Completeness; Formats
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.