Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
E. Borglund, T. Engvall (2014)
Open data?: Data, information, document or record?Records Management Journal, 24
Füsun Ülengin, Özgür Kabak, S. Onsel, E. Aktas, B. Parker (2011)
The competitiveness of nations and implications for human developmentSocio-economic Planning Sciences, 45
(2015)
Open data barometer
F. Zhao, A. Collier, Hepu Deng (2014)
A multidimensional and integrative approach to study global digital divide and e-government developmentInf. Technol. People, 27
Andrea Kavanaugh, Ankit Ahuja, S. Gad, S. Neidig, Manuel Pérez-Quiñones, Naren Ramakrishnan, J. Tedesco (2012)
(Hyper) local news aggregation: designing for social affordancesGov. Inf. Q., 31
G. Pereira, Marie Macadar, E. Luciano, Maurício Testa (2017)
Delivering public value through open government data initiatives in a Smart City contextInformation Systems Frontiers, 19
Guangwei Hu, Wenwen Pan, Mingxin Lu, Jie Wang (2009)
The widely shared definition of e-Government: An exploratory studyElectron. Libr., 27
Attila Márton, M. Avital, T. Jensen (2013)
Reframing Open Big Data
Kerry Smith (2012)
Managing Research DataLibrary Management, 33
C. Ciborra (2005)
Interpreting e-government and development: Efficiency, transparency or governance at a distance?Inf. Technol. People, 18
Melissa Terras (2015)
Opening Access to collections: the making and using of open digitised cultural contentOnline Inf. Rev., 39
A. Vetrò, L. Canova, Marco Torchiano, Camilo Minotas, R. Iemma, Federico Morando (2016)
Open data quality measurement framework: Definition and application to Open Government DataGov. Inf. Q., 33
T.G. Davies (2014)
Open data policies and practice: an international comparison
A. Meijer, M. Thaens (2009)
Public information strategies: Making government information available to citizensInf. Polity, 14
Judie Attard, F. Orlandi, S. Scerri, S. Auer (2015)
A systematic review of open government data initiativesGov. Inf. Q., 32
Hui-Ju Wang, J. Lo (2016)
Adoption of open government data among government agenciesGov. Inf. Q., 33
Anneke Zuiderwijk, M. Janssen (2014)
Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparisonGov. Inf. Q., 31
Amanda Meng (2014)
Investigating the Roots of Open Data’s Social ImpactJeDEM: eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 6
P. Conradie, Sunil Choenni (2012)
Exploring process barriers to release public sector information in local government
V. Pina, L. Torres, S. Royo (2009)
E-government evolution in EU local governments: a comparative perspectiveOnline Inf. Rev., 33
Ronald Mitchell, Bradley Agle, D. Wood (1997)
Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really CountsAcademy of Management Review, 22
K. O’Hara (2012)
Data quality, government data and the open data infospherepaper presented at AISB/IACAP World Congress: Information Quality Symposium
(2016)
All countries compared for government > government type”, CIA world factbooks (18 december 2003 to 28 march 2011), aggregates compiled by NationMaster
Thorhildur Jetzek, M. Avital, N. Bjørn-Andersen (2012)
The Value of Open Government Data: A Strategic Analysis Framework
Peter Lund (2013)
Managing Research DataThe Electronic Library, 31
Tim O'Reilly (2011)
Government as a PlatformInnovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 6
O. Reichman, Matthew Jones, M. Schildhauer (2011)
Challenges and Opportunities of Open Data in EcologyScience, 331
T. Scassa (2014)
Privacy and Open GovernmentFuture Internet, 6
Aaron Baur (2017)
Harnessing the social web to enhance insights into people’s opinions in business, government and public administrationInformation Systems Frontiers, 19
Gamel Wiredu (2012)
Information Systems Innovation in Public Organisations: An Institutional PerspectiveInf. Technol. People, 25
(2016)
All countries compared for lifestyle > quality of life index”, quality of life, aggregates compiled by NationMaster
Natasa Veljkovic, Sanja Bogdanovic-Dinic, L. Stoimenov (2014)
Benchmarking open government: An open data perspectiveGov. Inf. Q., 31
Yanjie Feng, Tongshen Wan (2013)
Website-based investor relations: a comparison between developed and developing economiesOnline Inf. Rev., 37
R. Nugroho, Anneke Zuiderwijk, M. Janssen, M. Jong (2015)
A comparison of national open data policies: lessons learnedTransforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 9
J. Hendler, J. Holm, Chris Musialek, George Thomas (2012)
US Government Linked Open Data: Semantic.data.govIEEE Intelligent Systems, 27
(2009)
Executive order 13526 - Classified national security information
T. Harrison, D. Sayogo (2014)
Transparency, participation, and accountability practices in open government: A comparative studyGov. Inf. Q., 31
M. Rahman (2014)
Statistical analysis of democracy indexHumanomics, 30
Milan Paroski, Z. Konjovic, D. Surla (2013)
Implementation of e-Government at the Local Level in Underdeveloped Countries: the Case Study of AP VojvodinaElectron. Libr., 31
Fatemeh Zeleti, A. Ojo (2017)
Open data value capability architectureInformation Systems Frontiers, 19
F. López-Arceiz, Ana Pérezgrueso, M. Torres (2017)
Accessibility and transparency: impact on social economyOnline Inf. Rev., 41
Graham Pryor (2012)
Managing Research Data
R. Freeman (2010)
Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach
Maxat Kassen (2017)
Open data in Kazakhstan: incentives, implementation and challengesInf. Technol. People, 30
A. Fitzgerald, Neale Hooper, John Cook (2013)
Implementing open licensing in government open data initiatives: a review of Australian government practiceProceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Open Collaboration
Steve Wallace, Adrian Reid, D. Clinciu, Jin-Su Kang (2013)
Culture and the Importance of Usability AttributesInf. Technol. People, 26
T. Berners-Lee (2006)
Linked data
Nikolaos Konstantinou, Dimitrios-Emmanuel Spanos, Nikos Houssos, N. Mitrou (2014)
Exposing scholarly information as Linked Open Data: RDFizing DSpace contentsElectron. Libr., 32
M. Janssen, Y. Charalabidis, Anneke Zuiderwijk (2012)
Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open GovernmentInformation Systems Management, 29
Maxat Kassen (2018)
Adopting and managing open data: Stakeholder perspectives, challenges and policy recommendationsAslib J. Inf. Manag., 70
Marcel Rosenberger, Christiane Lehrer, R. Jung (2017)
Integrating data from user activities of social networks into public administrationsInformation Systems Frontiers, 19
V. Weerakkody, Z. Irani, Kawal Kapoor, U. Sivarajah, Yogesh Dwivedi (2017)
Open data and its usability: an empirical view from the Citizen’s perspectiveInformation Systems Frontiers, 19
(2012)
Open data white paper: unleashing the potential”, cabinet office
Luz Rojas, G. Bermúdez, J. Lovelle (2014)
Open Data and Big Data: A Perspective from Colombia
The purpose of this study is to review the levels of open government data (OGD) among various countries that are not consistent with the development levels of those countries. This study evaluates the associativity between OGD Index (OGD) and the characteristics of those countries as well as to compare the degree of OGD among countries. Accordingly, an advanced discussion to explore how a country’s characteristics affect how that country’s government opens data was presented.Design/methodology/approachThe stakeholder relationships of OGD is analysed with the characteristics of a country. The usage data are compared with the data availability according to nine indicators. These data collected from the statistics and OGDI websites are grouped for comparative statistical analyses based on basic descriptive statistics, one-way analysis of variance and a regression model with variance inflation faction.FindingsThe results 1) revealed the reasons some countries have high-ranking indexes and 2) verified the high index values of countries in terms of their degrees of development. This study, thus, attempted to derive a balanced appraisal of national development and OGD.Research limitations/implicationsThe study sample is limited only to countries 1) which open the statistical data; and 2) are of uneven population density and development degree. The OGDI is limited to expert evaluation. The score might be vary to experts and users with diverse countries at different evaluation period. The limitations can be attributed to the differences between OGDI and real open levels. These differences might influence the reliability and validity.Practical implicationsGovernment departments with OGD policies provide raw data in various formats and with application interfaces for user access. This study, thus, attempts to derive a balanced appraisal of national development and OGD. The factors that evaluate which types of countries open the level of data are explored.Originality/valueThis study establishes stakeholder relationships of OGD and extends to analyse the characteristics of a country and OGD that affect the government data open level. The relationships are evaluated through the OGDI with design score scheme. The measurement results indicated that a country possesses high relation to open data with high DI and nature resource.
The Electronic Library – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 3, 2019
Keywords: Information technology strategy; Data analysis; E-governance; Open data; Regression model; National characteristics
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.