Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Hurley, A. Choudhary (2020)
Role of gender and corporate risk takingCorporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20
L.D. Parker (2014)
Corporate social accountability through action: contemporary insights from British industrial pioneersAccounting, Organizations and Society, 39
N. Van der Walt, C. Ingley (2003)
Board dynamics and the influence of professional background, gender and ethnic diversity of directorsCorporate Governance, 11
S. Karim, N.A. Manab, R.B. Ismail (2020a)
The dynamic impact of board composition on CSR practices and their mutual effect on organizational returnsJournal of Asia Business Studies, 14
L. Mahoney, L. Thorne (2006)
An examination of the structure of executive compensation and corporate social responsibility: a Canadian investigationJournal of Business Ethics, 69
S. Karim, N.A. Manab, R.B. Ismail (2019)
Legitimising the role of corporate boards and corporate social responsibility on the performance of Malaysian listed companiesIndian Journal of Corporate Governance, 12
A. Barnea, A. Rubin (2010)
Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholdersJournal of Business Ethics, 97
D.C. Hambrick, P.A. Mason (1984)
Upper echelonsAcademy of Management Review, 9
V. Singh, S. Terjesen, S. Vinnicombe (2008)
Newly appointed directors in the boardroom: how do women and men differ?European Management Journal, 26
I. Ullah, A. Zeb, M.A. Khan, W. Xiao (2020)
Board diversity and investment efficiency: evidence from ChinaCorporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20
M. Feng, X. Wang, J.G. Kreuze (2017)
Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance: comparison analyses across industries and CSR categoriesAmerican Journal of Business, 32
D.M. Roodman (2009)
A note on the theme of too many instrumentsOxford Bulletin of Economic Review, 63
P. Velte (2019)
Do CEO incentives and characteristics influence corporate social responsibility (CSR) and vice versa? A literature reviewSocial Responsibility Journal, 16
M. Friedman (1970)
Money and income: comment on TobinThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84
M. Arellano, O. Bover (1995)
Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components modelsJournal of Econometrics, 68
N.A. Sheikh, S. Kareem (2015)
The impact of board structure, ownership concentration and CEO remuneration on performance of Islamic commercial banks in PakistanPakistan Journal of Islamic Research, 15
M. Jensen, W. Meckling (1976)
Theory of firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and capital structureJournal of Financial Economics, 3
F. Khaoula, D. Moez (2019)
The moderating effect of the board of directors on firm value and tax planning: evidence from European listed firmsBorsa Istanbul Review, 19
S.T. Petra, N.T. Dorata (2008)
Corporate governance and chief executive officer compensationCorporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 8
P.C. Miles, G. Miles (2013)
Corporate social responsibility and executive compensation: exploring the linkSocial Responsibility Journal, 9
R.M. Baron, D.A. Kenny (1986)
The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerationsJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51
J. Wade, C. O’Reilly, T. Pollock (2006)
Overpaid CEOs and underpaid managers: fairness and executive compensationOrganization Science, 17
Y. Cai, H. Jo, C. Pan (2011)
Vice or virtue? The impact of corporate social responsibility on executive compensationJournal of Business Ethics, 104
K. Rowlingson, S. Connor (2010)
The ‘deserving’ rich? Inequality, morality and social policyJournal of Social Policy, 40
G. Abdalkrim (2019)
Chief executive officer compensation, corporate governance and performance: evidence from KSA firmsCorporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 19
A.J. Hillman, A.A. Cannella, I.C. Harris (2002)
Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: how do directors differ?Journal of Management, 28
R.C. Orlando (2017)
Racial diversity, business strategy and firm performance: are source-based viewAcademy of Management Journal, 43
I. Khan, I. Khan, I. Senturk (2019)
Board diversity and quality of CSR disclosure: evidence from PakistanCorporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 19
T.J. Cox, S. Blake (1991)
Managing cultural diversity: implications for organizational competitivenessAcademy of Management Perspectives, 5
S.B. Kanadlı, P. Zhang, N.K. Kakabadse (2020)
How job-related diversity affects boards’ strategic tasks performance: the role of chairpersonCorporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20
(2017)
Malaysian code on corporate governance securities commission Malaysia
(2019)
Corporate governance monitor 2019
S. Karim, N.A. Manab, R.B. Ismail (2020b)
Assessing the governance mechanisms, corporate social responsibility and performance: the moderating effect of board independenceGlobal Business Review
A. Adam, M. Schwartz (2009)
Corporate governance, ethics, and the backdating of stock optionsJournal of Business Ethics, 85
J.D. Sargan, R.E. Hart, J. Mills, J.K. Whittaker (1964)
Wages and prices in the United Kingdom: a study in econometric methodologyEconometric Analysis for National Economics Planning
R. Blundell, S. Bond (1998)
Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data modelsJournal of Econometrics, 87
S. Karim, N.A. Manab, R.B. Ismail (2020c)
The interaction effect of independent boards on CG-CSR and performance nexusAsian Academy of Management Journal, 25
Y. Titova (2016)
Are board characteristics relevant for banking efficiency? Evidence from the USCorporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 16
M. Arellano, S. Bond (1991)
Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equationsThe Review of Economic Studies, 58
P. Berrone, L. Gomez-Mejia (2009)
Environmental performance and executive compensation: an integrated agency-institutional perspectiveAcademy of Management Journal, 52
N. Erhardt, J. Werbel, C. Shrader (2003)
Board of director diversity and firm financial performanceCorporate Governance, 11
I.F. Kesner (2017)
Directors’ characteristics and committee membership: an investigation of type, occupation, tenure, and genderAcademy of Management Journal, 31
This study aims to investigate the relationship between remuneration packages [chief executive officer (CEO) and director] and independent corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices (marketplace, environment, community, workplace and money spent on CSR) of 588 Malaysian listed firms during 2006–2017. Further, the study explored the moderating effect of board gender diversity on the remuneration-CSR nexus.Design/methodology/approachThe dynamic estimator; namely, the system generalized method of moments given by Arellano and Bover (1995) has been used on the data set to control dynamic endogeneity, unobserved heterogeneity and simultaneity problems.FindingsFindings indicate a weak relationship between remuneration and CSR where prior CEO remuneration negatively influences marketplace activities, environment-related activities and workplace practices. However, directors’ remuneration leaves no effect on socially responsible activities. Moreover, board gender diversity negatively moderates the CEO remuneration-CSR relationship and an insignificant moderating effect has been observed for directors’ remuneration-CSR nexus.Practical implicationsThis study is particularly significant for regulatory bodies of Malaysia e.g. Securities Commission Malaysia, Bursa Malaysia, policymakers, investors and managers. For academia, this study fetches support from agency theory and overinvestment hypothesis to explain the relationships.Originality/valueThis paper is novel in providing empirical evidence on the moderating effect of board gender diversity on the relationship between remuneration and independent CSR activities for the first time. Moreover, this study has sourced several theoretical and practical implications. Then, the study uses a dynamic estimator that caters to the problems of endogeneity, simultaneity and heterogeneity.
Corporate Governance – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 26, 2021
Keywords: Agency theory; Board gender diversity; Corporate social responsibility; Executive remuneration; System GMM
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.