Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
MEED (2008)
Middle East Economic Digest
Pauliina Ulkuniemi (2003)
Purchasing software components at the dawn of market
G. Jergeas (2008)
Analysis of the Front-End Loading of Alberta Mega Oil Sands ProjectsProject Management Journal, 39
M. Giezen (2012)
Keeping it simple? A case study into the advantages and disadvantages of reducing complexity in mega project planningInternational Journal of Project Management, 30
Xiaojun Wei (2007)
A case study of German investment in China and the CEECsInternational Journal of Chinese Culture and Management, 1
R. Loo (2003)
A multi‐level causal model for best practices in project managementBenchmarking: An International Journal, 10
Juliane Teller, Alexander Kock, H. Gemünden (2014)
Risk Management in Project Portfolios is More than Managing Project Risks: A Contingency Perspective on Risk ManagementProject Management Journal, 45
Cost Engineering, 50
Transport Policy, 9
Charles Ameringer (1978)
The path between the seas : the creation of the Panama Canal, 1870-1914Americas, 58
N. Bruzelius, B. Flyvbjerg, W. Rothengatter (1998)
Big decisions, big risks: improving accountability in mega projectsInternational Review of Administrative Sciences, 64
K. Aziz, Nur Najid (2010)
Sales incentive scheme: insights from the Malaysian telecommunication sectorInternational Journal of Business Excellence, 3
M. Oldstone (2020)
Viruses, Plagues, and History
A. Chan, Ada Chan (2004)
Key performance indicators for measuring construction successBenchmarking: An International Journal, 11
A. Khan (2014)
Effects of cultural assimilation on the performance of a construction project – evidence from UAEBenchmarking: An International Journal, 21
Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 16
Noel Maurer, Carlos Yu (2010)
The Big Ditch: How America Took, Built, Ran, and Ultimately Gave Away the Panama Canal
R. Yin (1984)
Case Study Research: Design and Methods
Antipode, 37
Michael Conniff (2001)
Panama and the United States: The End of the Alliance
Glen Krutz, J. Peake (2009)
Treaty Politics and the Rise of Executive Agreements: International Commitments in a System of Shared Powers
M. Sutrisna, P. Barrett (2007)
Applying rich picture diagrams to model case studies of construction projectsEngineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 14
Z. Majdalani, M. Ajam, T. Mezher (2006)
Sustainability in the construction industry: a Lebanese case studyConstruction Innovation: Information, Process, Management, 6
S. Senaratne, M. Sexton (2012)
Engineering , Construction and Architectural Management Emerald Article : Role of knowledge in managing construction project change
Tom Kendrick (2003)
Identifying and Managing Project Risk
M. Sandhu, P. Helo, T. Kekäle (2009)
The influence of culture on the management of project business: a case studyInternational Journal of Innovation and Learning, 6
Edmond Lam, A. Chan, Daniel Chan (2007)
Benchmarking the performance of design‐build projects: Development of project success indexBenchmarking: An International Journal, 14
B. Flyvbjerg, Mette holm, Søren Buhl (2003)
How common and how large are cost overruns in transport infrastructure projects?Transport Reviews, 23
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is twofold: first, to investigate project management dimensions while constructing the Panama Canal from the end of ninetieth century to the start of twentieth century and then benchmarking against the Palm Diera Island at the lapse of a century. Second, to highlight issues of project management, specially the risk management with its economic, social and political domains at the construction site and in France and America.Design/methodology/approachThe case study research method of qualitative research has been adopted when comparing two mega projects executed in different time and space. For the Panama Canal project documentation investigation was performed. However, a semi-structured interview data collection method was adopted for the Palm Diera Island project. A comparative study of two projects helps in deeper understanding of cross-project management dimensions.FindingsThe research reveals that the French team failed to complete the Panama Canal construction project due to inadequate planning, inappropriate design, lack of risk management, health and safety of the staff and non-availability of finances. However, the Americans successfully completed construction of the canal within budget and time and this was due to the support of change in the purpose of the canal construction adding to achieve its commercial objectives and at the same time strengthen its naval presence. American took its construction as a national objective than the individual enterprise as executed by the French team.Research limitations/implicationsData collection for the Panama Canal was limited to only historical data available from the literature as documentary investigation. The researchers visited the canal to get in-depth understanding of the construction practices and the scale of construction. However, for the Palm Diera project, data collection was limited to three key personnel interviews.Practical implicationsThe Americans were successful in completing the canal due to the US Government control on management and finances of the canal construction and lessons learned during the French construction period. The paper serves as a benchmark for project management dimension in two different regions in different times. The paper bears economic implications for the construction of the mega projects both in South America and the Middle East. Cost overrun construction of the Panama Canal during the French period influenced political spectrum in France resulting into the defeat of the government. During the American period of construction first time out of country visit by the sitting president of the USA reflects its economic and social importance. The valley of death was converted into the valley comfort during the American period resulting into social welfare of the workers. Completion of the canal by the Americans helped them secure operations of the Panama Canal for the next 100 years, contributing to its economic and naval strength.Social implicationsThe paper reveals that safety and social implications for the work place in two different regions and at two different times. The impact of safe and improved working conditions at Palm Diera Island resulted into no injury or loss of life, however, during the Panama Canal construction more than 30,000 workers died affecting not only families of the respective workers but their nations as well. The impacts of both the projects on the society were also significant. The public opinion against the construction of the canal during the French period of construction was so significant that they had to abandon their construction equipment at the site. On the contrary, completion of construction of the Panama Canal during the French period helped secured political mileage for President Roosevelt and his party.Originality/valueThe paper benchmarks two different mega projects with different scope executed in two different regions at the lapse of a century. No such research work was found to have compared project management dimensions of two mega projects at the lapse of a century and in two different regions.
Benchmarking: An International Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Aug 7, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.