Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Vassilis Serafeimidis, S. Smithson (2000)
Information systems evaluation in practice: a case study of organizational changeJournal of Information Technology, 15
Általános tudományok (2010)
Diffusion of Innovations
J. Adams (1965)
Inequity In Social ExchangeAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2
C. Friedman, J. Wyatt
Evaluation Methods in Medical Informatics
M.Q. Patton
Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods
L. Wang, S. Bretschneider, J. Gant
Web‐based e‐government services with a citizen‐centric aroach
A. Lenhart, J. Horrigan, L. Rainie, K. Allen, A. Boyce, M. Madden, E. O'Grady
The Ever‐shifting Internet Population. A New Look at Internet Access and the Digital Divide
E. Hufnagel, Christopher Conca (1994)
User Response Data: The Potential for Errors and BiasesInf. Syst. Res., 5
Anita Melander-Wikman, M. Jansson, G. Gard (2005)
The MobiHealth usability evaluation questionnaireEhealth International, 2
D. West
Assessing E‐government: The Internet, Democracy and Service Delivery by State and Federal Governments
T. Lauer, K. Joshi, Thomas Browdy (2000)
Case Report: Use of the Equity Implementation Model to Review Clinical System Implementation Efforts: A Case ReportJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 7 1
Paul Legris, John Ingham, P. Collerette (2003)
Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance modelInf. Manag., 40
Ha-Min Oh, C. Rizo, M. Enkin, A. Jadad (2005)
What Is eHealth (3): A Systematic Review of Published DefinitionsJournal of Medical Internet Research, 7
D. Gustafson, R. Hawkins, S. Pingree, F. McTavish, N. Arora, J. Mendenhall, D. Cella, R. Serlin, F. Apantaku, J. Stewart, A. Salner (2001)
Effect of computer support on younger women with breast cancerJournal of General Internal Medicine, 16
N. Melone (1990)
A theoretical assessment of the user-satisfaction construct in information systems researchManagement Science, 36
Lemuria Carter, F. Bélanger (2004)
Citizen adoption of electronic government initiatives37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the
B. Farbey, F. Land, D. Targett
Evaluating investments in IT: findings and a framework
E. Steinfeld, G.S. Danford
Enabling Environments. Measuring the Impact of Environment on Disability and Rehabilitation
R.K. Yin
Case Study Research: Design and Methods
J. Ballantine, R. Galliers, S. Stray (1996)
Information systems/technology evaluation practices: evidence from UK organizationsJournal of Information Technology, 11
J.W. Creswell
Research Design. Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches
J. Mingers, F. Stowell
Information Systems: An Emerging Discipline?, Information Systems Series
P.L. Powell
Evaluation of information technology investments: business as usual
L. Burgess
A conceptual framework for understanding and measuring perceived service quality in net‐based customer support systems
N. Connell, T. Young (2007)
Evaluating healthcare information systems through an "enterprise" perspectiveInf. Manag., 44
N. Wickramasinghe, S. Goldberg (2004)
How M=Ec/sup 2/ in healthcareInternational Conference on Information Technology: Coding and Computing, 2004. Proceedings. ITCC 2004., 2
N. Wickramasinghe, S. Misra (2004)
A wireless trust model for healthcareInternational journal of electronic healthcare, 1 1
M. Patton (1990)
Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed.
K. Stroetmann, T. Jones, A. Dobrev
Evaluating the economic impact of e‐health applications approach and method
Patrick Chau, P. Hu (2001)
Information Technology Acceptance by Individual Professionals: A Model Comparison ApproachDecis. Sci., 32
World Markets Research Centre and Brown University
Global e‐government survey 2001
H. Terry Ma, P. Zaphiris
The Usability and Content Accessibility of the E‐government in the UK
N. Wickramasinghe, S. Goldberg (2004)
How M = EC2 in healthcareInt. J. Mob. Commun., 2
B. Caldwell, M. Cooper, L. Reid, G. Vanderheiden
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0
T. Horan, Tarun Abhichandani, Raghuvira Rayalu (2006)
Assessing User Satisfaction of E-Government Services: Development and Testing of Quality-in-Use Satisfaction with Advanced Traveler Information Systems (ATIS)Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06), 4
V. Grover, S. Jeong, A. Segars (1996)
Information systems effectiveness: The construct space and patters of applicationInf. Manag., 31
Paul Smaglik, Robert Hawkins, S. Pingree, David Gustafson, E. Boberg, Earl Bricker (1998)
The quality of interactive computer use among HIV-infected individuals.Journal of health communication, 3 1
A. Bower (2005)
The Diffusion and Value of Healthcare Information Technology
L. Lapointe, Lise Lamothe, J. Fortin (2002)
The dynamics of IT adoption in a major change process in healthcare deliveryProceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
Pan American Health Organization
Setting up Healthcare Services Information Systems: A Guide for Requirement Analysis, Application Specification, and Procurement. Essential Drugs and Technology Program, Division of Health Systems and Services Development
V. Zeithaml, A. Parasuraman, A. Malhotra (2000)
A conceptual framework for understanding e-service quality : implications for future research and managerial practice
Lili Wang, S. Bretschneider, J. Gant (2005)
Evaluating Web-Based E-Government Services with a Citizen-Centric ApproachProceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
T. Lauer, K. Joshi, T. Browdy
Use of the equity implementation model to review clinical system implementation efforts
R. Glasgow (2007)
eHealth evaluation and dissemination research.American journal of preventive medicine, 32 5 Suppl
Fred Davis (1989)
Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information TechnologyMIS Q., 13
L. Tornatzky, K. Klein (1982)
Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findingsIEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-29
E.T. Loiacono, R.T. Watson, D.L. Goodhue
Webqual: a web site quality instrument
Xiaoming Zeng, B. Parmanto (2004)
Web Content Accessibility of Consumer Health Information Web Sites for People with Disabilities: A Cross Sectional EvaluationJournal of Medical Internet Research, 6
T. Eng (2002)
eHealth Research and Evaluation: Challenges and OpportunitiesJournal of Health Communication, 7
(1994)
Usability assessment and measurement.
T. Overbye, Xu Cheng, Y. Sun (2004)
A comparison of the AC and DC power flow models for LMP calculations37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the
R. Freeman (2010)
Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach
C. Medlin (2007)
Case Study Research
S. Cronholm, G. Goldkuhl
Six generic types of information systems evaluation
D. Mont
Measuring disability prevalence
Ulrica Löfstedt (2012)
E-Government - Assessment of Current Research and Some Proposals for Future DirectionsInternational Journal of Public Information Systems, 1
B. Farbey, F. Land, D. Targett (1995)
A taxonomy of information systems applications: the benefits' evaluation ladderEuropean Journal of Information Systems, 4
Z. Al‐adawi, S. Yousafzai, J. Pallister
Conceptual model of citizen adoption of e‐government
V. Mantzana, Marinos Themistocleous (2006)
A Method for the Identification of Actors Involved in the Adoption of Innovations in Healthcare OrganizationsProceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06), 5
J. Brender (2005)
Handbook of evaluation methods for health informatics
D. Gustafson, J. Wyatt (2004)
Evaluation of ehealth systems and servicesBMJ : British Medical Journal, 328
J. Mitchell (2000)
Increasing the cost-effectiveness of telemedicine by embracing e-healthJournal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 6
N. Bevan, H. Petrie, N. Claridge
Strategies for providing guidance on usability and accessibility
K. Peffers, T. Saarinen (2002)
Measuring the Business Value of IT Investments: Inferences From a Study of a Senior Bank ExecutiveJournal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 12
J. Nielsen
Usability Engineering (Interactive Technologies)
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the user's perspective in evaluating e‐health services and to present evaluation criteria that influence users' utilization and satisfaction of e‐health services. Design/methodology/approach – The paper is based on two lines of studies relating to the behaviour of users of new products or services and on broad examining and critical analysis of the existing evaluations initiatives in e‐governments services generally but also particularly in an e‐health context. Findings – The paper argues that e‐health services evaluation frameworks should be criteria‐based, while the criteria can be grounded in, and derived from, one or more specific perspectives or theories, and cannot be entirely framed within the bounds of a single theory or perspective. The paper suggests an evaluation framework for e‐health services and provides a set of clear and useful e‐health evaluation criteria that can be accommodated by such a framework. Research limitations/implications – The limitation of this paper lies in the absence of empirical validation and examination of the proposed evaluation criteria that have not yet been applied in the fieldwork. Hence, the proposed criteria require an empirical validation which will be performed by the authors in the next stage of this research using a multiple case study strategy and will form the basis for further research. Practical implications – The proposed evaluation criteria can be used to help achieve better user services utilization, to serve as part of an e‐health evaluation framework, and to address areas that require further attention in the development of future e‐health initiatives. Originality/value – The paper presents a well‐argued and balanced hierarchy of evaluation criteria that can contribute to an area of research which is still in its infancy in terms of development and management.
Transforming Government People Process and Policy – Emerald Publishing
Published: Aug 1, 2008
Keywords: Health services; Communication technologies
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.