Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
The NASD and the SEC are looking into methods, fees, conflicts of interest, and other issues related to fairness opinions. The fairness opinion process as currently practiced is likely to be deemed inadequate, and as such will offer less protection to boards of directors. To protect the role of the fairness opinion process as a risk‐mitigating tool, the board must changes its perceptions and expectations. The board must insist that the financial advisor help it gain a thorough understanding of all the valuation issues that impact a transaction ‐ including, for example, the appropriateness of the valuation methodologies and assumptions employed and the strategic implications of the acquisition or divestiture.
Journal of Investment Compliance – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 1, 2004
Keywords: Financial institutions; Investments; Investment funds; Investors; Investments
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.