Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
V. Tummala, J. Burchett (1999)
Applying a Risk Management Process (RMP) to manage cost risk for an EHV transmission line projectInternational Journal of Project Management, 17
Standards Zealand. (2004)
Risk management guidelines: companion to AS/NZS 4360:2004
Y. Kwak, S. Dewan (2001)
Risk Management in International Development Projects
R. Chapman (2001)
The controlling influences on effective risk identification and assessment for construction design managementInternational Journal of Project Management, 19
A. Jaafari (2001)
Management of risks, uncertainties and opportunities on projects: time for a fundamental shiftInternational Journal of Project Management, 19
D. Lessard, Roger Miller (2001)
Understanding and Managing Risks in Large Engineering ProjectsMIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper Series
D. Hillson (2002)
Extending the risk process to manage opportunitiesInternational Journal of Project Management, 20
A. Akintoye, Malcolm Macleod (1997)
Risk analysis and management in constructionInternational Journal of Project Management, 15
Audrey Dorofee, Julie Walker, Christopher Alberts, R. Higuera, Richard Murphy (1996)
Continuous Risk Management Guidebook.
Risk identification often produces nothing more than a long list of risks, which can be hard to understand or manage. The list can be prioritised to determine which risks should be addressed first, but this does not provide any insight into the structure of risk on the project. Traditional qualitative assessment cannot indicate those areas of the project which require special attention, or expose recurring themes, concentrations of risk, or ‘hot‐spots’ of risk exposure. The best way to deal with a large amount of data is to structure the information to aid comprehension. For risk management, this can be achieved with a Risk Breakdown Structure )RBS) a hierarchical structuring of risks on the project. The RBS can assist in understanding the distribution of risk on a project or across a business, aiding effective risk management. Just as the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) is an important tool for projects because it scopes and defines the work, so the RBS can be an invaluable aid in understanding risk. The WBS forms the basis for many aspects of the project management process; similarly, the RBS can be used to structure and guide the risk management process. This paper presents the concept of the RBS, and gives a number of examples drawn from different project types and industries. Although not necessarily based in FM, the concepts and experience can be applied to any project. The benefits of using the RBS are then outlined, including as an aid for risk identification or risk assessment, comparison of projects, providing a framework for cross‐project risk reporting, and structuring lessons to be learned for future projects. This paper shows how to use the RBS to gain these benefits.
Journal of Facilities Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jan 1, 2003
Keywords: Risk management; Risk Breakdown Structure; RBS; WBS; Project
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.