Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Harnad (1998)
The invisible hand of peer reviewNature
J. Kam (2007)
Ring a Ring O' Roses: Quality Journals and Gamesmanship in Management StudiesNew Institutional Economics
C. Bunting
Early careers spent grinding teeth, not cutting them
G. Gorman (2008)
Can we be assured of quality scholarship in a peer review-less environment?Online Inf. Rev., 32
P. Calvert (2004)
LIS Journal Quality: Results of a Study for the IFLA Library and Information Science Journals Section
Purpose – This paper aims to look at the Oppenheim effect in scholarly journal publishing. Design/methodology/approach – Discusses the quality control of refereed scholarly journals. Findings – A key finding of this research was that editors perceived originality to be the most important factor in their assessment of manuscripts. Originality/value – Provides a discussion on the quality control of scholarly journals.
Online Information Review – Emerald Publishing
Published: Aug 14, 2007
Keywords: Serials; Quality control; Publishing
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.