Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
I. Jacobson, Magnus Christerson, L. Constantine (1994)
The OOSE method: a use—case-driven approach
M. Paulk, C. Weber, S. Garcia, M. Chrissis, M. Bersh
Key practices of the capability maturity model, version 1.1
L. Macaulay
Requirements Engineering
John Wilson (1995)
Business Processes: Modelling and Analysis for Re-engineering and ImprovementJournal of the Operational Research Society, 47
T. Rout (1995)
SPICE: A Framework for Software Process AssessmentSoftw. Process. Improv. Pract., 1
R. Bailey (1989)
Human performance engineering: using human factors/ergonomics to achieve computer system usability (2nd ed.)
(1995)
Managing Compexity
H. Harrington (1991)
Business process improvement : the breakthrough strategy for total quality, productivity, and competitiveness
(1995)
Loucopoulos/Karakostas 95] Loucopolos, Pericles and Karakostas, Vassilos, System Requirements Engineering
B. (Ed.) Warboys
Business Systems Engineering ‐ A Process Approach
(1996)
Process-Centred Software Engineering Environments
M. Snowdon (1979)
The Heart of EnterpriseJournal of the Operational Research Society, 31
Peter Gyngell (1994)
Process Innovation: Reengineering Work through Information TechnologyEuropean Journal of Information Systems, 3
C. Weber, M. Paulk, Cynthia Wise, James Withey (1991)
Key Practices of the Capability Maturity Model
(1996)
Business Systems Engineering – A Process Approach, draft book
(1996)
A Systemantic Survey of CMM Experience and Results
R. Cooper, R. Kaplan (1998)
Design of Cost Management Systems
M. Winter, David Brown, P. Checkland (1995)
A role for soft systems methodology in information systems developmentEuropean Journal of Information Systems, 4
D. Embley, B. Kurtz, S. Woodfield
Object‐Oriented Analysis: A Model‐Driven Approach
(1995)
The Evolution of the SEI's Capability Maturity Model for Software " , Software Process Improvement and Practice, Pilot issue
(1992)
Verlag Industrielle Organisation
R. Adomeit, W. Deiters, B. Holtkamp, F. Schulke, H. Weber (1992)
K/2/sub R/: a kernel for the ESF software factory support environmentProceedings of the Second International Conference on Systems Integration
P. Feiler, W. Humphrey (1993)
Software process development and enactment: concepts and definitions[1993] Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Software Process-Continuous Software Process Improvement
M. Lehman (1991)
Software engineering, the software process and their supportSoftw. Eng. J., 6
(1994)
Goal-based models of collaboration
M. Paulk (1995)
How ISO 9001 Compares With The CMMIEEE Softw., 12
E. Mumford (1995)
Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business RevolutionEuropean Journal of Information Systems, 4
P. Kueng, P. Bichler, P. Kawalek, M. Schrefl (1996)
How to compose an object-oriented business process model?
E. Scherer, Martina Zölch (1995)
Design of activities in shop floor management: A holistic approach to organisation at operational business levels in BPR projects
P. Loucopoulos, V. Karakostas
System Requirements Engineering
The way in which business process models are typically deployed emphasizes their use in a high‐level design or the capture of an existing process. At these stages evaluation of the model takes place only in informal and rudimentary ways. The real evaluation effort begins only with the output of the design process, e.g. an implementation of information technology (IT) support system. Explores the benefits and feasibility of evaluating a process model at an early stage of its creation. Anticipates two advantages. First, errors or invalid design concepts are detected earlier with consequent savings in cost. Second, non‐IT‐relevant aspects can come to light at an appropriate stage. Looks first, at the value of modelling goals. Second, presents in outline a design method for modelling business processes in which the concept of the goal is fundamental. Third, looks beyond the current scope of this method to the issue of evaluating the process designs. Concludes that business process models can be evaluated at the design stage, but the knowledge gained is only partial. Summarizes the strengths and weaknesses of the approach and describes some open questions.
Business Process Management Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 1, 1997
Keywords: BPR; Goals; Models; Quality
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.