Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Crandall, J. Sidak (2002)
Is Structural Separation of Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers Necessary for CompetitionYale Journal on Regulation, 19
M. Cave (2002)
Is LoopCo the answerInfo, 4
T. Beard, George Ford, Lawrence Spiwak (2001)
Why Adco? Why Now? An Economic Exploration into the Future of Industry Structure for the "Last Mile" in Local Telecommunications Markets
J. Sandbach (2001)
Levering open the local loop: shaping BT for broadband competitionInfo, 3
This paper responds to continuing arguments about the necessity for structural separation of the telecommunications local loop. It attempts to strike a balance by stressing that in fact a wide range of questions are yet to be answered. And the onus is fairly placed on the proponents of structural separation to provide persuasive answers proving that the drastic action they call for is necessary. In addition, many of the benefits of structural separation are unquantifiable and, indeed, conjectural, while the costs of this severe measure are more certain and substantial. Moreover, while seemingly simple in concept, there is a formidable range of difficulties relating to the implementation of structural separation.
Info – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 1, 2004
Keywords: Telecommunications; Communication technologies; Local area networks
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.