Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Hobday (1998)
Product complexity, innovation and industrial organisationResearch Policy, 26
R.M. Henderson, K.B. Clark
Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms
M. Albert, D. Avery, F. Narin, P. McAllister (1991)
Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patentsResearch Policy, 20
C. Quandt (1995)
Manufacturing the Electric Vehicle: A Window of Technological Opportunity for Southern CaliforniaEnvironment and Planning A, 27
M. Shnayerson (1996)
The Car That Could: The Inside Story of GM's Revolutionary Electric Vehicle
H. Ernst, J. Vitt (2000)
The Influence of Corporate Acquisitions on the Behaviour of Key InventorsR & D Management, 30
K. Clark (1991)
Product development performance : strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry / Kim B. Clark, Tahahiro Fujimoto, 1991
Wesley Cohen, Daniel Levinthal (1989)
Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&DThe Economic Journal, 99
F. Narin, D. Olivastro (1988)
Technology indicators based on patents and patent citations
G. Day, P. Schoemaker (2000)
Avoiding the Pitfalls of Emerging TechnologiesCalifornia Management Review, 42
K. Clark, T. Fujimoto
Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization, and Management in the World Auto Industry
W. Weber, Remco Hoogma (1998)
Beyond national and technological styles of innovation diffusion: a dynamic perspective on cases from the energy and transport sectorsTechnology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10
H. Ernst
Key inventors: implications for human resource management
R. Rothwell, P. Gardiner (1984)
Design and competition in engineeringLong Range Planning, 17
R. McAdam, J. Mcclelland (2002)
Individual and team‐based idea generation within innovation management: organisational and research agendasEuropean Journal of Innovation Management, 5
Roger Miller, M. Hobday, Thierry Leroux-Demers, Xavier Olleros (1995)
Innovation in Complex Systems Industries: the Case of Flight SimulationIndustrial and Corporate Change, 4
S. Stone
Automakers have major stake in fuel cells
J. Bower, Clayton Christensen (1995)
Disruptive Technologies: Catching the WaveJournal of Product Innovation Management, 1
T. Teichert, H. Ernst (1999)
Assessment of R&D collaboration by patent dataPICMET '99: Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Proceedings Vol-1: Book of Summaries (IEEE Cat. No.99CH36310), 1
Clayton Christensen (1997)
The Innovator's Dilemma
K. Brockhoff (1992)
Instruments for patent data analyses in business firmsTechnovation, 12
Z. Griliches (2007)
R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence
A. Drejer (2002)
Situations for innovation management: towards a contingency modelEuropean Journal of Innovation Management, 5
H. Ernst (1999)
Key inventors: implications for human resource management in R&DPICMET '99: Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Proceedings Vol-1: Book of Summaries (IEEE Cat. No.99CH36310)
R. Henderson, K. Clark (1990)
Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of
A. Davies (1997)
The life cycle of a complex product systemInternational Journal of Innovation Management, 01
E. Braun, D. Wield (1994)
Regulation as a means for the social control of technologyTechnology Analysis & Strategic Management, 6
California Energy Commission
The ABCs of AFVs
S. Toyota
The electric vehicle: the challenge of the next century
R. Dyerson, A. Pilkington (2000)
INNOVATION IN COMPLEX SYSTEMS: REGULATION AND TECHNOLOGY TOWARDS THE ELECTRIC VEHICLEInternational Journal of Innovation Management, 04
C. Watanabe, Youichirou Tsuji, C. Griffy-Brown (2001)
Patent statistics: deciphering a ‘real’ versus a ‘pseudo’ proxy of innovationTechnovation, 21
K. Brockhoff
Instruments for patent data
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the development of the electric vehicle, technological capabilities of incumbents and would‐be new entrants in the auto industry. These are discussed with reference to US regulatory moves towards zero emission standards to provide a new framework for identifying the potential success of various types of regulation and the technological capabilities they demand. Design/methodology/approach – Methodologically, a two pronged approach is adopted whereby US patents are analysed to quantitatively confirm the presented case‐based evidence on responses to emission regulation. The paper also discusses the use of patents as a means of examining technological development. Findings – The paper shows the significant need for market protection for disruptive innovation and that a limiting factor of success in regulation occurs when radical technology is demanded. Originality/value – A new framework is presented for identifying the potential success of various types of regulation by linking to the technological capabilities they demand and identifies the significant need for market protection for disruptive innovation. This implies that a limiting factor of success in regulation occurs when radical technology is demanded.
European Journal of Innovation Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jan 1, 2006
Keywords: Road vehicles; Innovation; Environmental regulations
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.