Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Jyh‐Lin Wu, Hsiu-yun Lee (2009)
A revisit to the non-linear mean reversion of real exchange rates: Evidence from a series-specific non-linear panel unit-root testJournal of Macroeconomics, 31
Yin-Wong Cheung, K. Lai (1993)
Long-run purchasing power parity during the recent floatJournal of International Economics, 34
A. Andersson, Pär * (2005)
Forecasting real exchange rate trends using age structure data – the case of SwedenApplied Economics Letters, 12
Lucio Sarno, M. Taylor (2003)
The Economics of Exchange Rates
R. Baillie, David Selover (1987)
Cointegration and models of exchange rate determinationInternational Journal of Forecasting, 3
R. MacDonald (1993)
Long-run purchasing power parity: is it for real?The Review of Economics and Statistics, 75
R. MacDonald
Long run real exchange rate: is it for real?
P. Pedroni (1999)
Approximate Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors
N. Abuaf, Philippe Jorion (1990)
Purchasing Power Parity in the Long RunInternational Trade eJournal
Marcel Aloy, K. Gente (2009)
The role of demography in the long-run Yen/USD real exchange rate appreciationJournal of Macroeconomics, 31
M.P. Taylor
Real exchange rates and nonlinearities
A. Andersson, Pär Österholm (2006)
Population age structure and real exchange rates in the OECDInternational Economic Journal, 20
C. Kao (1996)
Spurious Regression and Residual-Based Tests for Cointegration in Panel Data When the Cross-Section and Time-Series Dimensions are ComparableEconometrics
R. MacDonald, I.W. Marsh
On the long run and short run purchasing power parity
G.S. Maddala, I.‐M. Kim
Unit Roots, Cointegration, and Structural Change
M. Cerrato, Nicholas Sarantis (2006)
Nonlinear Mean Reversion in Real Exchange Rates: Evidence from Developing and Emerging Market EconomiesEconomics Bulletin, 6
P. Kugler, C. Lenz (1993)
Multivariate Cointegration Analysis and the Long-Run Validity of PPPThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 75
B. Balassa (1964)
The Purchasing-Power Parity Doctrine: A ReappraisalJournal of Political Economy, 72
R. Engle, C. Granger (1987)
Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testingEconometrica, 55
Nicholas Sarantis (1981)
Employment, labor supply and real wages in market disequilibriumJournal of Macroeconomics, 3
S. Johansen (1991)
Estimation and Hypothesis Testing of Cointegration Vectors in Gaussian Vector Autoregressive ModelsEconometrica, 59
P. Pedroni
Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors
Mark Taylor, Lucio Sarno (1998)
The behavior of real exchange rates during the post-Bretton Woods periodJournal of International Economics, 46
Michael Pakko, P. Pollard (2003)
Burgernomics: a big MacT guide to purchasing power parityCanadian Parliamentary Review, 85
K. Im, M. Pesaran, Y. Shin (2003)
Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panelsJournal of Econometrics, 115
Jayen Patel (1990)
Purchasing Power Parity as a Long-Run RelationJournal of Applied Econometrics, 5
Andrew Levin, C. Lin, C. Chu (2002)
Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample propertiesJournal of Econometrics, 108
Nelson Mark (1990)
Real and nominal exchange rates in the long run
C. Grove, R. Fisher (1930)
Statistical Methods for Research WorkersNature, 131
C. Kao
Spurious regression and residual‐based tests for cointegration in panel data
R. MacDonald (1999)
Exchange Rate Behaviour: Are Fundamentals Important?The Economic Journal, 109
(1984)
A Reexamination of Purchasing Power Parity: A Multicountry and Multiperiod Study
Dean Corbae, S. Ouliaris (1988)
Cointegration and Tests of Purchasing Power ParityThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 70
R. Cantor, R. Driskill
Effect on the real exchange rate of demographic and fiscal policy‐induced changes in national savings: is the conventional academic wisdom always right?
J. Kremers, Neil Ericsson, J. Dolado (1992)
The Power of Cointegration TestsOxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 54
L. Gutierrez
On the power of panel cointegration tests: a Monte Carlo comparison
L. Gutierrez (2003)
On the power of panel cointegration tests: A Monte Carlo comparison. Economics Letters, 80(1):105-111Econometrics
G. Maddala, Shaowen Wu (1999)
A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple TestOxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61
W. Enders (1988)
ARIMA and Cointegration Tests of PPP under Fixed and Flexible Exchange Rate RegimesThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 70
A. Banerjee
Panel data unit root and cointegration: an overview
M.H. Pesaran
General diagnostics tests for cross section dependence in panels
S. Johansen, K. Juselius (2009)
MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION AND INFERENCE ON COINTEGRATION — WITH APPLICATIONS TO THE DEMAND FOR MONEYOxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52
Alan Taylor, Alan Taylor, Alan Taylor, Mark Taylor, Mark Taylor (2004)
The Purchasing Power Parity DebateJournal of Economic Perspectives, 18
Rolf Larsson, J. Lyhagen, M. Löthgren (2001)
Likelihood-Based Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous PanelsEconometrics Journal, 4
Geert Gielens, Peter Isard (1996)
Exchange Rate Economics.The Economic Journal, 106
M. Obstfeld, Kenneth Rogoff (1997)
Foundations of International Macroeconomics
B. Baltagi, G. Bresson, A. Pirotte (2006)
Panel Unit Root Tests and Spatial Dependence
J. Gregorio, A. Giovannini (1994)
International Evidence on Tradables and Nontradables InflationEuropean Economic Review, 38
N. Mark
Real and nominal exchange rates in the long run: an empirical investigation
R. MacDonald (1996)
Panel unit root tests and real exchange ratesEconomics Letters, 50
Ruhul Salim, Kamrul Hassan (2009)
Does the relative population growth affect purchasing power parity?Applied Economics Letters, 16
P. Minford (1983)
Labour Market Equilibrium in an Open Economy, 35
R. Roll
Violations of purchasing power parity and their implications for efficient international commodity markets
P. Samuelson (1964)
Theoretical Notes on Trade ProblemsThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 46
G. Maddala, In-Moo Kim (1998)
Unit Roots Cointegration and Structural Change: Unit roots
Mark Taylor, D. Peel, Lucio Sarno (2001)
Nonlinear Mean‐Reversion in Real Exchange Rates: Toward a Solution To the Purchasing Power Parity PuzzlesInternational Economic Review, 42
In Choi (2001)
Unit root tests for panel dataJournal of International Money and Finance, 20
A. Banerjee (1999)
Panel data unit roots and cointegration: an overview Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics 61
P. Phillips (1991)
Optimal Inference in Cointegrated SystemsEconometrica, 59
P. Pedroni (2004)
PANEL COINTEGRATION: ASYMPTOTIC AND FINITE SAMPLE PROPERTIES OF POOLED TIME SERIES TESTS WITH AN APPLICATION TO THE PPP HYPOTHESISEconometric Theory, 20
M. Aloy, K. Gente
How an aging population can explain the real appreciation of the Yen/US Dollar?
M. Darby (1980)
Does Purchasing Power Parity Work?NBER Working Paper Series
S. Johansen (1996)
Likelihood-Based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models
A.K. Rose, S. Supaat, J. Braude
Fertility and the real exchange rate
(2009)
Fertility and the Real Exchange Rate - Fécondité Et Taux De Change Réel
Purpose – The aim of this paper is to examine the relationship between relative population growth and purchasing power parity (PPP) exchange rate for a panel of 80 countries. Design/methodology/approach – Panel unit root and panel cointegration tests have been used to investigate the above relationship over the period of 1951‐2000. Findings – The empirical results show that there is stable relationship between PPP exchange rate and relative population growth in these selected countries in the long run. The results also show that this long‐run relationship remains valid when the sample is divided on the basis of their stage of development. Practical implications – These empirical findings suggest that population growth has an important role in exchange rate determination through PPP. Originality/value – Thus, relative population growth could invalidate the PPP hypothesis in the long run. PPP is the main edifice of most of the monetary exchange rate models. Hence, the role of relative population growth should be taken into account in dealing with issues in international macroeconomics and renewed attention should be given in the theory of exchange rate determination in terms of relative population growth instead of relative price level.
International Journal of Development Issues – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 4, 2011
Keywords: Purchasing power; Population; Panel unit root; Panel cointegration
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.