Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Spender (2006)
Getting value from knowledge managementThe Tqm Magazine, 18
J. Lave (1988)
Cognition in practice : mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday lifeContemporary Sociology, 19
Mitsuru Kodama (2007)
Innovation and knowledge creation through leadership-based strategic community: Case study on high-tech company in JapanTechnovation, 27
B. Kogut, U. Zander (1996)
What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and LearningOrganization Science, 7
S. Gächter, G. Krogh, Stefan Haefliger (2010)
Initiating private-collective innovation: The fragility of knowledge sharingResearch Policy, 39
E. Wenger (2000)
Communities of practice and social learning systems”. Organization :., 7
J. Lave, E. Wenger (1991)
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
P. Wolf
Eine Geschichte über Communities
G. Krogh, K. Ichijo, I. Nonaka (2000)
Enabling Knowledge Creation
E. Wenger
Knowledge management as a doughnut: shaping your knowledge strategy through communities of practice
G. Huber (1982)
Organizational Information Systems: Determinants of Their Performance and BehaviorManagement Science, 28
F. Barachini (2009)
Cultural and social issues for knowledge sharingJ. Knowl. Manag., 13
A. Amin, Joanne Roberts (2008)
Knowing in action: beyond communities of practiceResearch Policy, 37
E. Guba, Y. Lincoln (1981)
Effective Evaluation: Improving The Usefulness Of Evaluation Results Through Responsive And Naturalistic Approaches
N. Luhmann (1978)
Organisation und Entscheidung
M.B. Miles, A.M. Huberman
Qualitative Data Analysis. A Source Book of New Methods
Sebastian Spaeth, Stefan Haefliger, G. Krogh, Birgit Renzl (2008)
Communal resources in open source software developmentInf. Res., 13
G. von Krogh
Knowledge sharing and the communal resource
G. Huber (1991)
Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the LiteraturesOrganization Science, 2
I. Nonaka (1994)
A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge CreationOrganization Science, 5
U. Flick (1998)
An Introduction to Qualitative Research
E. Wenger, W. Snyder (2002)
Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge
E. Wenger, W. Snyder (2000)
Communities of Practice: The Organizational FrontierHarvard Business Review, 78
Rob Cross, Timoty Laseter, Andrew Parker, Guillermo Velasquez (2006)
Using Social Network Analysis to Improve Communities of PracticeCalifornia Management Review, 49
H. Krüger
Gruppendiskussion. Überlegungen zur Rekonstruktion sozialer Wirklichkeit aus der Sicht der Betroffenen
J. Brown, P. Duguid (1991)
Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and InnovationOrganization Science, 2
J. Maxwell (1996)
Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach
Stefano Borzillo (2009)
Top management sponsorship to guide communities of practiceJ. Knowl. Manag., 13
M. Patton (1980)
Qualitative research and evaluation methods
P. Wolf, Michael Wunram (2003)
Barriers To KM Between Organisational Cultures In The Face Of Concurrent Enterprising: How To Overcome Them?
G. von Krogh, K. Ichijo, I. Nonaka
Enabling Knowledge Creation: Unlocking the Mystery of Tacit Knowledge and Unleashing the Power of Innovation
M. Reiman, L. Wein, Fangruo Chen, E. Hippel (1998)
Economics of Product Development by Users: the Impact of Sticky Local InformationManagement Science, 44
Chao-Min Chiu, M. Hsu, Eric Wang (2006)
Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theoriesDecis. Support Syst., 42
H. Berends, W. Vanhaverbeke, R. Kirschbaum (2007)
Knowledge management challenges in new business development: Case study observationsJournal of Engineering and Technology, 24
Gabriel Szulanski (2000)
The Process of Knowledge Transfer: A Diachronic Analysis of StickinessOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82
I.A. Steinke
Quality criteria in qualitative research
Eric Lesser, J. Storck (2001)
Communities of practice and organizational performanceIBM Syst. J., 40
C. Webb
Dear diary: recommendations for researching knowledge transfer of the complex
Alexander Ardichvili, Vaughn Page, T. Wentling (2003)
Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practiceJ. Knowl. Manag., 7
Stefan Haefliger, G. Krogh, Sebastian Spaeth (2008)
Code Reuse in Open Source SoftwareManag. Sci., 54
J. Brown, P. Duguid (2001)
Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice PerspectiveOrganization Science, 12
G. Krogh (1998)
Care in Knowledge CreationCalifornia Management Review, 40
U. Flick (2009)
An introduction to qualitative research, 4th ed.
P. Hildreth, C. Kimble, Peter Wright (2000)
Communities of practice in the distributed international environmentJ. Knowl. Manag., 4
E. Wenger
Learning as social participation
Angel Cabrera, E. Cabrera (2002)
Knowledge-Sharing DilemmasOrganization Studies, 23
Snejina Michailova, K. Husted (2003)
Knowledge-Sharing Hostility in Russian FirmsCalifornia Management Review, 45
E. Wenger (2000)
Communities of Practice and Social Learning SystemsOrganization, 7
P. Rangachari (2009)
Knowledge sharing networks in professional complex systemsJ. Knowl. Manag., 13
Claire Anderson, M. Glassman, R. Mcafee, T. Pinelli (2001)
An investigation of factors affecting how engineers and scientists seek informationJournal of Engineering and Technology Management, 18
A. Alaszewski (2006)
Using diaries for social research
M. Thompson (2005)
Structural and Epistemic Parameters in Communities of PracticeOrgan. Sci., 16
Purpose – Communities of practice (CoPs) have been found to support knowledge creation by enabling knowledge sharing among experts in firms. However, some perform better than others. This paper seeks to explore what incentivizes employees to share knowledge in intra‐firm CoPs. Design/methodology/approach – The paper presents a longitudinal case study in a large automotive company that introduced 82 cross‐functional CoPs into its engineering department. Using extensive qualitative data, two sets of communities: best and worst performing were analyzed. Findings – It was found that perceived benefits and the employees' willingness to invest individual efforts into community work are stronger in better performing communities. Members of the better performing CoPs drew most benefits from participating in organizational decision processes, as they were able to influence the agenda and create relevant standards. The patterns observed relate to the efforts, benefits, and barriers of community work. Research limitations/implications – The single case study design limits the generalizability of the results beyond the company studied. Furthermore, some of the data employed were perceptional and relied partly on self‐reporting of the community members. Practical implications – The paper argues that management support for CoPs should aim at influencing the individual cost‐benefit calculus of community members. Respecting and implementing results from the communities' work is likely to provide the very basis for innovations to emerge at all. Originality/value – Other than extant studies on CoP performance that focus on company benefits from deploying CoPs, this paper offers a new perspective by exploring the benefits and incentives available to community members.
Journal of Knowledge Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Feb 22, 2011
Keywords: Knowledge management; Performance management
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.