Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
N. Karagozoglu, W. Brown (1993)
Time‐Based Management of the New Product Development ProcessJournal of Product Innovation Management, 10
Joseph Juran, F. Gryna (1982)
Quality Planning and Analysis: From Product Development Through Usage
A. Griffin (1992)
Evaluating QFD's Use in US Firms as a Process for Developing ProductsJournal of Product Innovation Management, 9
W. Deming (1982)
Quality, productivity, and competitive position
K.B. Clark, T. Fujimoto
Product Development Performance
L. Trygg (1993)
Concurrent Engineering Practices in Selected Swedish Companies: A Movement or an Activity of the Few?Journal of Product Innovation Management, 10
R. King (1987)
Listening to the voice of the customer: Using the quality function deployment systemNational Productivity Review, 6
Gilbert Churchill (1979)
A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing ConstructsJournal of Marketing Research, 16
M. Raynor (1994)
The ABCs of QFD: formalizing the quest for cost‐effective customer delightNational Productivity Review, 13
F. Gryna (1970)
Quality planning and analysis
G. Stalk, T. Hout (1990)
Competing Against TimeResearch-technology Management, 33
American Supplier Institute
Quality Function Deployment Implementation Manual
M. Philips, P. Sander, Cpm Govers (1994)
Policy formulation by use of QFD techniques : a case studyInternational Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 11
W. Skinner (1986)
The Productivity ParadoxThe Productivity-Inclusiveness Nexus
S. Pugh (1996)
Creating Innovative Products Using Total Design
J. Blackburn
Time‐based Competition
D. Garvin (1987)
Competing on the Eight Dimensions of QualityHarvard Business Review
J. Hauser, D. Clausing, D. Garvin (1988)
The House of QualityHarvard Business Review
R. Cooper, E. Kleinschmidt (1994)
Determinants of Timeliness in Product DevelopmentJournal of Product Innovation Management, 11
Robert Ruekert, O. Walker (1987)
Marketing's Interaction with Other Functional Units: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Evidence:Journal of Marketing, 51
B. Graessel
Using quality function deployment to improve customer service
L.A. Ealey
Quality by Design
L. Sullivan (1996)
QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENTTechnometrics, 19
Chia-Hao Chang (1989)
Quality function deployment (QFD) processes in an integrated quality information system, 17
R. Cooper, E. Kleinschmidt (1987)
Success factors in product innovationIndustrial Marketing Management, 16
L. Cohen (1988)
Quality function deployment: An application perspective from digital equipment corporationNational Productivity Review, 7
A. Gupta, S. Raj, D. Wilemon (1986)
A Model for Studying R&D–Marketing Interface in the Product Innovation ProcessJournal of Marketing, 50
Y. Kathawala, J. Motwani (1994)
Implementing Quality Function DeploymentThe Tqm Magazine, 6
M. Montoya-Weiss, R. Calantone (1994)
Determinants of New Product Performance: A Review and Meta-AnalysisJournal of Product Innovation Management, 11
J. Nunnally, McGraw-Hill New (1978)
Psychometric Theory: NY.
L. Cronbach (1951)
Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of testsPsychometrika, 16
M. Graham (1994)
Integrating Design and Manufacturing for Competitive AdvantageAcademy of Management Review, 19
Jennifer Hartnett, S. Schechter, D. Kropp (1988)
Managing Quality: The Strategic and Competitive Edge
P. Crosby (1979)
Quality Is Free: The Art of Making Quality Certain
Posits that advocates of quality function deployment (QFD) claim that it leads to better product designs, lower product costs, and shorter development times. Presents a study which aims to learn if organizations that apply QFD to product development achieve these benefits. Data from a survey of 80 QFD projects undertaken by 40 firms are used to examine these critical relationships. When leaders from these project teams were asked to compare results from product development efforts without QFD to results with QFD, they claimed that product designs and customer satisfaction improved significantly with QFD. Product costs and time‐to‐market showed only modest improvements. Benefits in time and costs may increase as QFD teams get better training and more experience. Describes the development and costing of a model of QFD implementation issues, product development outcomes, and customer satisfaction. Concludes that QFD’s implementation issues, specifically the organizational dimensions, have a significant impact on product design outcomes and resource consumption.
International Journal of Quality Science – Emerald Publishing
Published: Dec 1, 1997
Keywords: Customer satisfaction; Product design; Product development; Quality function deployment; Time
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.