Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
H. Schuman, S. Presser (1996)
Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording, and Context
R. Ferretti (1989)
Problem solving and strategy production in mentally retarded persons.Research in developmental disabilities, 10 1
Flynn Mc (1986)
Adults who are mentally handicapped as consumers: issues and guidelines for interviewing.Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
R. McConkey, Margaret Purcell, Irene Morris (1999)
Staff Perceptions of Communication with a Partner who is Intellectually DisabledJournal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 12
Tracy Carlson, A. Hames, S. English, C. Wills (2004)
Referrals to a Learning Disability Service and Consent to TreatmentTizard Learning Disability Review, 9
H. Grossman, M. Begab (1960)
Classification of Mental RetardationDevelopmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 2
Ruth Freedman (2001)
Ethical challenges in the conduct of research involving persons with mental retardation.Mental retardation, 39 2
Richard Hastings, B. Remington (1994)
Staff behaviour and its implications for people with learning disabilities and challenging behaviours.The British journal of clinical psychology, 33 ( Pt 4)
J. Jenkinson (1993)
Who Shall Decide? The Relevance of Theory and Research to Decision-making by People with an Intellectual Disability, 8
Kirsten Stalker, P. Harris (1998)
The Exercise of Choice by Adults with Intellectual Disabilities: A Literature ReviewJournal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 11
S. Biklen, Charles Moseley (1988)
“Are You Retarded?” “No, I'm Catholic”: Qualitative Methods in the Study of People with Severe HandicapsResearch and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 13
Margaret Purcell, Irene Morris, R. McConkey (1999)
Staff Perceptions of the Communicative Competence of Adult Persons with Intellectual DisabilitiesBritish Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 45
(1974)
Heuristics and Biases
Josephine Jenkinson (1999)
Factors affecting decision-making by young adults with intellectual disabilities.American journal of mental retardation : AJMR, 104 4
J. Kidd (1983)
Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and BiassesJournal of the Operational Research Society, 34
N. Jackson, E. Jackson (1998)
Choice-making for people with a learning disability: Neil Jackson and Eve Jackson use two studies to show choice-making techniquesLearning Disability Practice, 1
I. Clare, G. Gudjonsson (1993)
Interrogative suggestibility, confabulation, and acquiescence in people with mild learning disabilities (mental handicap): implications for reliability during police interrogations.The British journal of clinical psychology, 32 ( Pt 3)
H. Schuman, Jacqueline Scott (1987)
Problems in the Use of Survey Questions to Measure Public OpinionScience, 236
G. Gudjonsson (1986)
The relationship between interrogative suggestibility and acquiescence: Empirical findings and theoretical implicationsPersonality and Individual Differences, 7
S. Office (1999)
Mental Health Act 1983 Code of Practice
C. Sigelman, E. Budd, Spanhel Cl, C. Schoenrock (1981)
When in doubt, say yes: acquiescence in interviews with mentally retarded persons.Mental retardation, 19 2
M. Rawlings, L. Dowse, A. Shaddock (1995)
Increasing the Involvement of People with an Intellectual Disability in Choice Making Situations: A Practical ApproachInternational Journal of Disability Development and Education, 42
J. Winkler, D. Kanouse, J. Ware (1982)
Controlling for Acquiescence Response Set in Scale DevelopmentJournal of Applied Psychology, 67
Shaw Ja, Budd Ec (1982)
Determinants of acquiescence and naysaying of mentally retarded persons.American journal of mental deficiency, 87
R. Luckasson, S. Borthwick-Duffy, W. Buntinx, D. Coulter, E. Craig, A. Reeve, R. Schalock, M. Snell, D. Spitalnik, S. Spreat, M. Tassé (2002)
Mental Retardation: Definition, Classification, and Systems of Supports. 10th Edition.
E. Emerson, C. Hatton, K. Dickson, Rupa Gone, A. Caine, J. Bromley (1998)
Clinical Psychology and People with Intellectual Disabilities
A. Gaag (1998)
Communication Skills and Adults with Learning Disabilities: Eliminating Professional MyopiaBritish Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26
Claire Martin, Jenny West, C. Cull, M. Adams (2000)
A Preliminary Study Investigating How People with Mild Intellectual Disabilities Perform on the Rivermead Behavioural Memory TestJournal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 13
J. Wong, I. Clare, A. Holland, P. Watson, M. Gunn (2000)
The capacity of people with a ‘mental disability’ to make a health care decisionPsychological Medicine, 30
N. Bray, L. Turner (1987)
Production anomalies (not strategic deficiencies) in mentally retarded individualsIntelligence, 11
C. Bartlett, K. Bunning (1997)
The Importance of Communication Partnerships: A Study to Investigate the Communicative Exchanges Between Staff and Adults with Learning DisabilitiesBritish Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25
L. Dye, S. Hendy, D. Hare, M. Burton (2004)
Capacity to consent to participate in research – a recontextualizationBritish Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32
J. O'hara, Anthea Sperlinger (1997)
Adults with learning disabilities : a practical approach for health professionals
J. Jenkinson, Cheryl Copeland, Vicky Drivas, Helen Scoon, M. Yap (1992)
Decision-making by community residents with an intellectual disability, 18
R. Ferretti, A. Cavalier (1991)
Constraints on the Problem Solving of Persons with Mental RetardationInternational Review of Research in Mental Retardation, 17
C. Sigelman, E. Budd, Winer Jl, C. Schoenrock, Martin Pw (1982)
Evaluating alternative techniques of questioning mentally retarded persons.American journal of mental deficiency, 86 5
G. Gudjonsson, I. Clare (1995)
The relationship between confabulation and intellectual ability, memory, interrogative suggestibility and acquiescencePersonality and Individual Differences, 19
S. Asch (1951)
Effects of Group Pressure Upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgments
P. March (1992)
DO PHOTOGRAPHS HELP ADULTS WITH SEVERE MENTAL HANDICAPS TO MAKE CHOICESThe British Journal of Mental Subnormality, 38
C. Sigelman, E. Budd (1986)
Pictures as an Aide in Questioning Mentally Retarded Persons.Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 29
G. Gudjonsson (1999)
The psychology of interrogations, confessions, and testimonyJournal of Psychophysiology, 13
A. Tversky, D. Kahneman (1981)
The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.Science, 211 4481
Roy McConkey, Irene Morris, Margaret Purcell (1999)
Communications between staff and adults with intellectual disabilities in naturally occurring settings.Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 43 ( Pt 3)
M. Gunn, J. Wong, I. Clare, A. Holland (1999)
Decision-making capacity.Medical law review, 7 3
Ann Brown (1982)
Learning, remembering, and understanding
K. Arscott, D. Dagnan, B. Kroese (1998)
Consent to Psychological Research by People with an Intellectual DisabilityJournal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 11
D. Cardone (1999)
Exploring the Use of Question Methods: Pictures Do Not Always Help People with Learning DisabilitiesBritish Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 45
L. Heal, C. Sigelman (1995)
Response biases in interviews of individuals with limited mental ability.Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 39 ( Pt 4)
B. Wilson, R. Ivani-chalian (1995)
Performance of adults with Down's syndrome on the children's version of the Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test: a brief report.The British journal of clinical psychology, 34 ( Pt 1)
K. Arscott (1997)
Assessing the Capacity of People with Learning Disabilities to Make Decisions About TreatmentTizard Learning Disability Review, 2
A. Gaag, Klara Dormandy (1993)
Communication and Adults With Learning Disabilities: New Map of an Old Country
K. Arscott, Dave Dagnan, B. Kroese (1999)
Assessing the ability of people with a learning disability to give informed consent to treatmentPsychological Medicine, 29
G. Lancioni, M. O'Reilly, E. Emerson (1996)
A review of choice research with people with severe and profound developmental disabilities.Research in developmental disabilities, 17 5
Much of the discussion of capacity to consent has focused on how capacity can be assessed. However, in focusing on the assessment of capacity of people with learning disabilities, information from studies of human judgement and decision‐making in the general population has been ignored. This paper reviews the main factors that affect an individual's capacity to consent and examines the integration of research into these factors in the general population with that of people with learning disabilities. A person's capacity to consent is considered to be affected by three main processes: comprehension (ability to understand and retain information), decision‐making (ability to weigh up information and reach a decision) and communication (ability to communicate the decision made). The difficulties people with learning disabilities may have in these processes are discussed, and possible ways of overcoming these limitations are suggested.
Tizard Learning Disability Review – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 1, 2003
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.