Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Senge (1997)
THE FIFTH DISCIPLINEMeasuring Business Excellence, 1
Joseph Firestone, M. McElroy (2003)
Key Issues in the New Knowledge Management
V. Potter (2019)
Peirce's Philosophical Perspectives
J. Dewey (1938)
Logic, the theory of inquiry
C. O'Dell, J. Grayson
If We Only Knew What We Know
M. McElroy (2002)
The New Knowledge Management
Steven Cavaleri, D. Fearon (1996)
Managing in Organizations That Learn
C. Argyris
Knowledge for Action
Knowledge management continues to evolve as a discipline, yet even basic features that define a discipline have to be established. Developing a shared understanding of core concepts, such as the meaning of “knowledge”, has been elusive in this field. In the absence of reaching a universal definition, surrogates for knowledge are adopted because of their expediency or apparent face validity. To date, most knowledge management approaches err on the extremes of being seemingly practical or, on the other hand, being theoretically appealing, but few of these approaches are genuinely pragmatic. At one end, there are mechanistic, information‐based approaches that are actionable, but are often based on flawed philosophical grounds in that they fail to connect beliefs with action through knowledge. At the other extreme are approaches that are philosophically meritorious, but which are viewed by practitioners as being impractical because they are too fuzzy and their methods too unstructured. This paper proposes an approach to knowledge management that is based on firm philosophical grounding, but is also anchored to action via the tenets of pragmatism. This new framework for practicing knowledge management is based on the foundational premises of philosophical pragmatism established by America's greatest philosopher, Charles Sanders Peirce, over a century ago. Pragmatic knowledge aligns beliefs about the potential for effective action with the lessons of past experience. This paper will outline the conceptual underpinnings of such a pragmatic approach to managing knowledge.
The Learning Organization – Emerald Publishing
Published: Aug 1, 2004
Keywords: Action learning; Knowledge management; Philosophy; Pragmatism
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.