Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Oliver, L. Clarke‐Jones, R. Rees, R. Milne, P. Buchanan, J. Gabbay, G. Gyte, A. Oakley, K. Stein
Involving consumers in R and D Agenda setting for the NHS – developing an evidence based approach
T. Evans (2006)
Best research for best health: a new national health research strategy.Clinical medicine, 6 5
P. Hyde, H. Davies (2004)
Service design, culture and performance: Collusion and co-production in health careHuman Relations, 57
I . Charlmers, D . Altman
Systematic Reviews
B.N. Ong, G. Humphris
Prioritising needs with communities: rapid appraisal methodologies in health
L. Baxter, L. Thorne, A. Mitchell
Small Voices: Big Ideas
M. Gibbons, C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwatrzman, P. Scott, M. Trow
The New Production of Knowledge
SCIE
A Common Purpose: Recovery in Future Mental Health Services
E. Ferlie, L. Fitzgerald, Martin Wood, Chris Hawkins (2005)
The Nonspread of Innovations: the Mediating Role of ProfessionalsAcademy of Management Journal, 48
B. Ong (1993)
The Practice of Health Services Research
UK Mental Health Research Network
Guidance of Good Practice: Service User Involvement in the UK
M. Turner, P. Beresford
User Controlled Research. Brunel: Brunel University
Sandy Oliver, L. Clarke-Jones, R. Rees, R. Milne, Peter Buchanan, J. Gabbay, G. Gyte, A. Oakley, K. Stein (2004)
Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach.Health technology assessment, 8 15
J. Popay, G. Williams (1994)
Researching the People's Health
Darzi (Lord)
High Quality Care For All: NHS Next Stage Review Final Report
P. Beresford (2005)
Developing the theoretical basis for service user/survivor-led research and equal involvement in researchEpidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale, 14
Department of Health
New Horizons: Towards a Shared Vision for Mental Health
Department of Health
World Class Commissioning: Vision
H. Nowotny, P. Scott, M. Gibbons
Rethinking Science
K. Holland (2008)
Proposed changes for nurse education in England (UK) as a result of the Darzi report (DoH, 2008a) Health Quality Care for All--NHS next stage review final report: some initial observations.Nurse education in practice, 8 5
J. Denis, J. Lomas (2003)
Convergent evolution: The academic and policy roots of collaborative researchJournal of Health Services Research & Policy, 8
Emma Simpson, Allan House (2003)
User and carer involvement in mental health services: From rhetoric to scienceBritish Journal of Psychiatry, 183
J. Averill (2002)
Matrix Analysis as a Complementary Analytic Strategy in Qualitative InquiryQualitative Health Research, 12
L. Fitzgerald, S. Dopson, E. Ferlie, L. Locock (2007)
Knowledge in Action
A. Faulkner, Phil Thomas (2002)
User-led research and evidence-based medicineBritish Journal of Psychiatry, 180
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to describe a recent experiment in research coproduction in an evaluation of service planning at a London Mental Health NHS Trust. The paper aims to consider whether members of the research team who have themselves been users of mental health services are able to contribute to the research process as “experts by experience”, or if their experiential knowledge is “colonized” within the academic research team. Design/methodology/approach – A qualitative, comparative case study approach was adopted, using structured observations and semi‐structured interviews. Researchers' reflective accounts and a reflective focus group were employed to explore the process of coproduction. Findings – The paper concludes that, far from “colonising” expertise by experience, the experiment builds local capacity in research coproduction and usefully informs a service planning process that reflects the priorities and concerns of a range of stakeholders. Research limitations/implications – The paper describes a small, local experiment in research coproduction and so findings are limited in their scope. However, the study demonstrates an effective methodological approach to evaluating, empirically, the impact of coproduction on the health services research (HSR) process. Practical implications – The paper demonstrates the potential for repeated exercises in coproduction to build capacity in collaborative approaches to both HSR and service planning. Originality/value – The involvement of experts by experience is increasingly a policy requirement in the domains of both health service planning and HSR in the UK. There are very few empirical studies that evaluate the impact of that coproduction.
International Journal of Public Sector Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Aug 24, 2010
Keywords: Change management; Mental health services; Learning organizations; Health services; Knowledge management; United Kingdom
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.