Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Kuldeep Kumar, J. Hillegersberg (2000)
Enterprise resource planning: introductionCommun. ACM, 43
S.L. Pfleeger
Software Engineering: Theory and Practice
Maurice Landry, C. Banville, M. Oral (1996)
Model legitimisation in operational researchEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 92
P. Finlay, John Wilson (1997)
Validity of Decision Support Systems: Towards a Validation MethodologySystems Research and Behavioral Science, 14
P. Keys (1997)
Approaches to understanding the process of OR: Review, critique and extensionOmega-international Journal of Management Science, 25
D. Robey (1996)
Research Commentary: Diversity in Information Systems Research: Threat, Promise, and ResponsibilityInf. Syst. Res., 7
Technical Reviews: A Behaviorally Motivated Program of Research
I. Sommerville
Software Engineering
T. Hindle (1990)
Rational Analysis for a Problematic WorldJournal of the Operational Research Society, 41
Maurice Landry, Jean-Louis Malouin, M. Oral (1983)
Model validation in operations researchEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 14
D. Drury, A. Farhoomand (1998)
A Hierarchical Structural Model Of Information Systems SuccessInfor, 36
F. Stowell, J. Mingers (2004)
Information Systems an Emerging Discipline
C.J.H. Mann (2002)
Systems approaches to managementKybernetes, 31
P. Checkland
Model validation in soft systems practice
K. Kumar, J. van Hillegersberg
ERP experiences and evolution
Maurice Landry, C. Banville (1992)
A disciplined methodological pluralism for mis researchAccounting, Management and Information Technologies, 2
C. Sauer, D.R. Jeffery, L. Land, P. Yetton
The effectiveness of software development technical reviews: a behaviorally motivated program of research
H. Nissen, H. Klein, R. Hirschheim (1991)
Information systems research: contemporary approaches and emergent traditions
J. Mingers (2001)
Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist MethodologyInf. Syst. Res., 12
I. Sommerville (1995)
Software engineering (5th ed.)
The research aims to show that validation and legitimisation of an information systems (IS) project need to be treated simultaneously to improve software project management. A starting assumption is that traditional aspects of model validity and legitimisation in operational research can be applicable to the field of IS. However, non‐traditional types of IS are more suitable to be viewed from an interpretive viewpoint. Validation is explored both from hard systems and also from soft systems point of view. Some extensions on the notion of validation for soft systems are provided for that purpose. Issues regarding both validation and legitimisation in IS are illustrated on a case study regarding the management of an academic research management IS project. Issues related both validation and legitimisation in IS are illustrated on a case study regarding the management of an academic research IS project. The latter had eventually to be abandoned. The case study shows how the non‐adherence to the principles of validation and legitimisation lead to that situation.
Kybernetes – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 1, 2003
Keywords: Cybernetics; Information systems
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.