Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Amar (2004)
Motivating knowledge workers to innovate: a model integrating motivation dynamics and antecedentsEuropean Journal of Innovation Management, 7
C. MacNeil (2003)
Line managers: facilitators of knowledge sharing in teamsEmployee Relations, 25
R. Gapp (2002)
The influence the system of profound knowledge has on the development of leadership and management within an organisationManagerial Auditing Journal, 17
B. Janz, P. Prasarnphanich (2003)
Understanding the Antecedents of Effective Knowledge Management: The Importance of a Knowledge-Centered CultureDecis. Sci., 34
Ingo Forstenlechner, F. Lettice (2007)
Cultural differences in motivating global knowledge workersEquality, Diversity and Inclusion, 26
S. Stashevsky, R. Burke (2006)
Leadership in organizationsInternational Journal of Manpower, 27
D. Cramer (2003)
Advanced Quantitative Data Analysis
(2003)
When knowledge adds up to nothing: Why knowledge management fails and what you can do about it. Development and Learning
(2003)
Knowledge sharing and organizational learning: The impact of social architecture at ordnance survey
A. Elangovan, J. Xie (2000)
Effects of perceived power of supervisor on subordinate work attitudesLeadership & Organization Development Journal, 21
I. Lin, N. Schaeffer (1995)
USING SURVEY PARTICIPANTS TO ESTIMATE THE IMPACT OF NONPARTICIPATIONPublic Opinion Quarterly, 59
A. Riege (2007)
Actions to overcome knowledge transfer barriers in MNCsJ. Knowl. Manag., 11
A. Amar (2001)
Managing Knowledge Workers: Unleashing Innovation and Productivity
K. DeTienne, Gibb Dyer, Charlotte Hoopes, S. Harris (2004)
Toward a Model of Effective Knowledge Management and Directions for Future Research: Culture, Leadership, and CKOsJournal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 10
P. Hersey, K. Blanchard, Walter Natemeyer (1979)
Situational Leadership, Perception, and the Impact of PowerGroup & Organization Management, 4
(1965)
Social influence and power
John Politis (2005)
The influence of managerial power and credibility on knowledge acquisition attributesLeadership & Organization Development Journal, 26
C. Schriesheim, Timothy Hinkin, P. Podsakoff (1991)
Can ipsative and single-item measures produce erroneous results in field studies of French and Raven's (1959) five bases of power? An empirical investigation.Journal of Applied Psychology, 76
C. Crawford (2005)
Effects of transformational leadership and organizational position on knowledge managementJ. Knowl. Manag., 9
J. Darroch (2003)
Developing a measure of knowledge management behaviors and practicesJ. Knowl. Manag., 7
L. James (1982)
Aggregation Bias in Estimates of Perceptual Agreement.Journal of Applied Psychology, 67
M. McCrimmon (1995)
Bottom‐up leadershipExecutive Development, 8
L. James, R. Demaree, Gerrit Wolf (1993)
rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement.Journal of Applied Psychology, 78
P. Podsakoff, Scott MacKenzie, Jeong-Yeon Lee, Nathan Podsakoff (2003)
Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.The Journal of applied psychology, 88 5
K. Desouza, Yukika Awazu (2006)
Knowledge management at SMEs: five peculiaritiesJ. Knowl. Manag., 10
Y. Gal (2004)
The reward effect: a case study of failing to manage knowledgeJ. Knowl. Manag., 8
C. Holsapple (2004)
Handbook Of Knowledge Management: Knowledge Matters
C. Lucier
When knowledge adds up to nothing: why knowledge management fails and what you can do about it
S. Singh (2008)
Role of leadership in knowledge management: a studyJ. Knowl. Manag., 12
Herman Aguinis, Mitchell Nesler, Megumi Hosoda, J. Tedeschi (1994)
The Use of Influence Tactics in PersuasionJournal of Social Psychology, 134
M. Withey (2004)
Development of a Scale to Measure Knowledge WorkThe International Journal of Knowledge, Culture, and Change Management: Annual Review, 3
P. Makin, C. Cooper, C. Cox (1989)
Managing People at Work
Herman Aguinis, M. Ansari, S. Jayasingam, Rehana Aafaqi (2008)
Perceived Entrepreneurial Success and Social PowerManagement Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 6
Timothy Hinkin, C. Schriesheim (1989)
Development and application of new scales to measure the French and Raven (1959) bases of social power.Journal of Applied Psychology, 74
C. Connelly, E. Kelloway (2003)
Predictors of employees’ perceptions of knowledge sharing culturesLeadership & Organization Development Journal, 24
I. Kubo, A. Saka (2002)
An inquiry into the motivations of knowledge workers in the Japanese financial industryJ. Knowl. Manag., 6
Joseph Davis, E. Subrahmanian, A. Westerberg (2005)
The "global" and the "local" in knowledge managementJ. Knowl. Manag., 9
John Politis (2001)
The relationship of various leadership styles to knowledge managementLeadership & Organization Development Journal, 22
Steven Farmer, Herman Aguinis (2005)
Accounting for subordinate perceptions of supervisor power: an identity-dependence model.The Journal of applied psychology, 90 6
L. James, R. Demaree, Gerrit Wolf (1984)
Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias.Journal of Applied Psychology, 69
M. Dfouni (2002)
Knowledge leaders' critical issues : an international Delphi study
M.C. Lo, T. Ramayah
Supervisors’ power and turnover intentions: the moderating impact of leader‐member exchange
Chinho Lin, S. Tseng (2005)
The implementation gaps for the knowledge management systemInd. Manag. Data Syst., 105
K. Wong, E. Aspinwall (2004)
Characterizing knowledge management in the small business environmentJ. Knowl. Manag., 8
J. Jong, D. Hartog (2007)
How leaders influence employees' innovative behaviourEuropean Journal of Innovation Management, 10
Nicholas O'Regan, A. Ghobadian (2004)
Testing the homogeneity of SMEs: The impact of size on managerial and organisational processesEuropean Business Review, 16
C. Fiol, E. O'Connor, Herman Aguinis (2001)
All for One and One for All? the Development and Transfer of Power Across Organizational LevelsAcademy of Management Review, 26
M. Ansari (1990)
Managing People at Work: Leadership Styles and Influence Strategies
B. Raven (1992)
A power/interaction model of interpersonal influence: French and Raven thirty years later.Journal of Social Behavior and Personality
J. George, L. James (1993)
Personality, affect, and behavior in groups revisited: Comment on aggregation, levels of analysis, and a recent application of within and between analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology, 78
W. Lam, A. Chua (2005)
The mismanagement of knowledge managementAslib Proc., 57
Y. Malhotra (2004)
Why Knowledge Management Systems Fail: Enablers and Constraints of Knowledge Management in Human Enterprises
J. French, B. Raven (1959)
The bases of social power.
V. Ribière, Aleša Sitar (2003)
Critical role of leadership in nurturing a knowledge-supporting cultureKnowledge Management Research & Practice, 1
EPU
Knowledge Content in Key Economic Sectors in Malaysia: Phase II
D. Long, Liam Fahey (2000)
Diagnosing cultural barriers to knowledge managementAcademy of Management Perspectives, 14
K. Bhal, M. Ansari (2000)
Managing Dyadic Interactions in Organizational LeadershipGlobal Business Review, 3
J.C. Nunnally, I.H. Bernstein
Psychometric Theory
M. Migdadi (2009)
Knowledge management enablers and outcomes in the small-and-medium sized enterprisesInd. Manag. Data Syst., 109
A. Serenko, N. Bontis, T. Hardie (2007)
Organizational size and knowledge flow: a proposed theoretical linkJournal of Intellectual Capital, 8
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to identify the key leadership characteristics (in the form of social power) needed in a knowledge‐based firm that can influence knowledge workers (KWs) to participate actively in creating, sharing, and using knowledge. Design/methodology/approach – Data measuring top leaders social power and knowledge management (KM) practices is gathered from 402 KWs representing 180 Multimedia Super Corridor status firms in Malaysia. Findings – The analysis indicates that expert power has a positive influence on the extent of knowledge acquisition and dissemination practices. Legitimate power is found to impede knowledge acquisition practices. Furthermore, reliance on referent power no longer works in a knowledge‐based context. Finally, the paper found the impact of coercive, legitimate, and reward power to be contingent on the organizational size. Research limitations/implications – Besides leaders potential to influence, there may be other factors that could influence the extent of KM practices in organization. Further, this paper explores the power of top management, which could not be generalized to leaders from middle or lower level management. Future research should address these limitations. Practical implications – The paper implies that knowledge leaders need to enhance certain bases of power that have the potential to improve the extent of KM practices in organizations. Originality/value – This paper provides useful insights about the significance of leaders' power bases with emphasis on new approaches needed in knowledge‐based organizations.
Industrial Management & Data Systems – Emerald Publishing
Published: Feb 2, 2010
Keywords: Knowledge organizations; Knowledge management; Knowledge capture; Knowledge sharing; Leaders; Malaysia
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.