Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Britton (2000)
THE EPISTEMOLOGY OF THE GENDERED ORGANIZATIONGender & Society, 14
Jim Allan (1993)
Male Elementary Teachers: Experiences and Perspectives
M. Ferree (2003)
Practice Makes Perfect?Gender & Society, 17
Joan Acker (1990)
HIERARCHIES, JOBS, BODIES:Gender & Society, 4
P. Martin (2003)
“Said and Done” Versus “Saying and Doing”Gender & Society, 17
Beth Quinn (2002)
Sexual Harassment and MasculinityGender & Society, 16
B. Francis, C. Skelton (2001)
Men Teachers and the Construction of Heterosexual Masculinity in the ClassroomSex Education, 1
E. Hall (1993)
Smiling, Deferring, and FlirtingWork and Occupations, 20
S. Gherardi (1994)
The Gender We Think, The Gender We Do in Our Everyday Organizational LivesHuman Relations, 47
S. Gherardi, Barbara Poggio (2001)
Creating and recreating gender order in organizationsJournal of World Business, 36
R. Leidner (1991)
SERVING HAMBURGERS AND SELLING INSURANCE:Gender & Society, 5
R. Connell (2003)
Developing a Theory of Gender as PracticeGender & Society, 17
J. Kenway (1996)
Reasserting masculinity in Australian schoolsWomens Studies International Forum, 19
Lee Chalmers (1996)
The Gendering of Marketing Activities: An Example from the Computer Industry
S. Murray (1996)
“WE ALL LOVE CHARLES”Gender & Society, 10
Williams C. (1995)
10.1525/9780520915220
P. Martin (2001)
`Mobilizing Masculinities': Women's Experiences of Men atOrganization, 8
Barbara Poggio (2000)
Between Bytes and Bricks: Gender Cultures in Work ContextsEconomic and Industrial Democracy, 21
This paper, based on forty in‐depth interviews with teachers and principals in Hong Kong, utilizes the insights of feminist organization studies to explore the persistence of gender inequalities in primary school teaching. Two common practices, namely the assignment of women and men to teach lower and higher grades respectively and the monopoly of men in positions of disciplining and authority, are centered. The data suggest that schools and teachers actively construct and reproduce gender inequalities by trivializing teaching of young children as babysitting, naturalizing women as natural caregivers, and normalizing the use of threat in disciplinary control. My analysis also argues that these routine and pervasive gendering processes are not often acknowledged or challenged, which have the effects of marginalizing caring work, overlooking the emotional labor of women, valorizing a masculine view of authority, encouraging men and boys to compete for power via aggression, and hence producing a masculinist workplace.
Equal Opportunities International – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 1, 2004
Keywords: Gendering practices; Female‐dominated occupation; Primary school teaching; Caring; Disciplinary control; Masculinties
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.