Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Haig Bosmajian (1976)
Obscenity and freedom of expression
B. Maddox (1994)
D.H. Lawrence: The Story of a Marriage
R. Costa, J. Cowan (1983)
D. H. Lawrence: An Annotated Bibliography of Writings about Him, 43
William Hicks, Viscount, st
Do we need a censor
P. Preston (1994)
A D.H. Lawrence chronology
Jay Gertzman (1990)
A Descriptive Bibliography of Lady Chatterley's Lover: With Essays Toward a Publishing History of the Novel
L. Friedman, Charles Rembar (1970)
Obscenity : the complete oral arguments before the Supreme Court in the major obscenity cases
P. Poplawski, J. Worthen (1996)
D. H. Lawrence: A Reference Companion
D. Lawrence, A. Huxley (1932)
The letters of D. H. Lawrence
D. Lawrence
John Thomas and Lady Jane
D. Lawrence
A propos of Lady Chatterley's lover : being an essay extended from "My skirmish with Jolly Roger"
D. Lawrence (1944)
The first Lady Chatterley
D. Lawrence, H. Moore (1962)
The collected letters of D. H. Lawrence
A. Craig (1977)
The Banned Books of England and Other Countries: A Study of the Conception of Literary Obscenity
J. Frank, Harry Clor (1971)
Censorship and freedom of expression : essays on obscenity and the law
Charles Rembar (1968)
The End of Obscenity: The Trials of Lady Chatterley, Tropic of Cancer and Fanny Hill
D. Lawrence (1931)
Apropos of Lady Chatterley's lover
G. Orioli (1938)
Adventures of a bookseller
R. Draper (1970)
D.H. Lawrence : the critical heritage
Penguin, C. Rolph (1961)
The trial of Lady Chatterley : Regina v. Penguin Books Ltd : the transcript of the trial
Watson Mr., E. Robert (1997)
Signs of Life
D. Britton (1988)
Lady Chatterley: The Making of the Novel
D. Jackson, Michael Squires (1985)
D.H. Lawrence's Lady: A New Look at Lady Chatterley's Lover
Michael Squires (1983)
The creation of Lady Chatterley's lover
W. Buckley (1993)
Lady Chatterley's Lover: Loss and Hope
D.H. Lawrence thought Lady Chatterley's Lover was his best and most important novel. Yet he had to pay to have it privately printed. His publishers thought his sexual descriptions and language were obscene under the censorship laws of the UK and the USA, and they were right. From 1928 until 1959 no-one could legally publish or sell the unexpurgated novel, and copies were subject to confiscation. All this changed in 1959 when Charles Rembar successfully defended Grove Press's right to publish the novel. His defense, which rested on a unique interpretation of Justice Brennan's opinion in Roth v. United States, introduced the redeeming-social-value test for obscenity. Within six years it revolutionized American obscenity laws, ensuring that sexual material with even a small measure of social value would enjoy First Amendment protection.
Reference Services Review – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 1, 2000
Keywords: Censorship; Freedom of information; Literature; Legal disputes
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.