Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
David Chappell, J. Schermerhorn (1999)
Using Electronic Student Portfolios in Management Education: A Stakeholder PerspectiveJournal of Management Education, 23
D. Cambridge (2008)
Layering Networked and Symphonic Selves: A Critical Role for e-Portfolios in Employability through Integrative LearningCampus-wide Information Systems, 25
P. Butler
A Review of the Literature on Portfolios and Electronic Portfolios, eCDF ePortfolio Project
G. Hallam, Wendy Harper, C. McCowan, Kim Hauville, Lynn McAllister, T. Creagh (2008)
ePortfolio use by university students in Australia: Informing excellence in policy and practice
P. Black, D. Wiliam (1998)
Assessment and Classroom LearningAssessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5
A. Jafari
The ‘sticky’ ePortfolio system: tackling challenges & identifying attributes
G. Lorenzo, J. Ittelson, Diana Oblinger (2005)
An Overview of E-Portfolios
H. McNeil, Chris Hughes, Susan Toohey, S. Dowton (2006)
An innovative outcomes-based medical education program built on adult learning principlesMedical Teacher, 28
L. Stefani, R. Mason, C. Pegler (2007)
The Educational Potential of e-Portfolios: Supporting Personal Development and Reflective Learning
JISC
Effective Practice with e‐Portfolios: Supporting 21st Century Learning
C. Hughes, Susan Toohey, G. Velan (2008)
eMed Teamwork: a self-moderating system to gather peer feedback for developing and assessing teamwork skillsMedical Teacher, 30
G. Atwell, A. Chrzaszcz, J. Pallister, V. Hornung‐Prahauser, W. Hilzensauer
MOSEP: Grab Your Future with an ePortfolio, More Self‐Esteem with My e‐Portfolio
R. Ward, H.C. Richardson
Getting What You Want: Implementing Personal Development Planning Through e‐Portfolio
Wendy Harper, C. McCowan, Kim Hauville, Kimberly Moody, Dominique Chorazyczewski (2007)
Voluntary or compulsory : using a variety of approaches and models to implement the Student e-Portfolio across 40,000 students at QUTDivision of Technology, Information and Library Services
N. Falchikov (2005)
Improving Assessment through Student Involvement
Alan Smith (2008)
Developing and leveraging the professional intellect through working e-portfoliosThe International Journal of Management Education, 2
Eilean Watson, Peter Moloney, Susan Toohey, Chris Hughes, Suzanne Mobbs, James Leeper, H McNeil (2007)
Development of eMed: a comprehensive, modular curriculum-management system.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 82 4
N. Falchikov (2001)
Learning Together: Peer Tutoring in Higher Education
Wilma Meeus, F. Questier, Thea Derks (2006)
Open source eportfolio: development and implementation of an institution‐wide electronic portfolio platform for studentsEducational Media International, 43
G. Raison, L. Pelliccione
Aligning assessment practices with long term outcomes in higher education
Javier Ayala (2006)
Electronic Portfolios for WhomEducause Quarterly, 29
Baxter Magolda, B. Marcia (2002)
Learning that lasts: Integrating learning, development and performance in college and beyondThe Journal of Higher Education, 73
J. Strivens
A Survey of e‐pdp and e‐portfolio Practice in UK Higher Education
D.S. Chappell, J.R. Schermerhorn
Electronic student portfolios in management education
R. Edgerton, P. Hutchings, Kathleen Quinlan (1991)
The Teaching Portfolio: Capturing the Scholarship in Teaching.
W. Rickards, Mary Diez, Linda Ehley, L. Guilbault, Georgine Loacker, J. Hart, P. Smith (2008)
Learning, Reflection, and Electronic Portfolios: Stepping Toward an Assessment PracticeThe Journal of General Education, 57
J. New, J. Clawson, R. Coughlan, J. Hoyle (2008)
How Course Portfolios Can Advance the Scholarship and Practice of Management TeachingJournal of Management Education, 32
Georgine Loacker, G. Rogers (2005)
Assessment at Alverno College: Student, program, institutional
M. Mentkowski (1999)
Learning that Lasts
S. Barrie (2003)
Conceptions of generic graduate attributes : a phenomenographic investigation of academics' understanding of generic graduate attributes in the context of contemporary university courses and teaching
G. Cheng (2008)
Implementation Challenges of the English Language Eportfolio System from Various Stakeholder PerspectivesJournal of Educational Technology Systems, 37
S. Barrie (2006)
Understanding What We Mean by the Generic Attributes of GraduatesHigher Education, 51
D. Boud, N. Falchikov (2006)
Aligning assessment with long‐term learningAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31
P. Worthington (2000)
Technology support for authentic assessment in the new millennia: a case study on implementing digital portfolios
D. Tosh, Tracy Light, K. Fleming, J. Haywood (2005)
Engagement with Electronic Portfolios: Challenges from the Student PerspectiveCanadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31
AACSB
AACSB Assurance of Learning Standards, An Interpretation
D. Bernstein, A. Burnett, A. Goodburn, P. Savory (2006)
Making Teaching and Learning Visible: Course Portfolios and the Peer Review of Teaching
NLII
E‐portfolios
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to discuss the potential and the challenges of successful integration of ePortfolios and graduate attributes into the curriculum. Design/methodology/approach – An argument is presented about the positioning of ePortfolios, and their links to graduate attributes, that draws upon the experiences of working with teachers to design, implement and support effective teaching practices to inform the challenges and opportunities that ePortfolios present for institutions, teachers and business curricula. Findings – The potential of ePortfolios for supporting student learning must be balanced against the difficulties of embedding the necessary curriculum changes. Institutions expecting to see take‐up of ePortfolios by their teachers will need different strategies than those that accompanied the introduction of learning management systems. Research limitations/implications – The paper is based on experiences in an Australian context and a small‐scale trial. The limited availability of studies of student learning and the longitudinal use of ePortfolios in the social networking Web 2.0 context are also limitations. Practical implications – A range of potential uses of ePortfolios is considered with a particular focus on seeing their use from the whole‐of‐program viewpoint, with discussion of the limitations for curriculum if decisions about ePortfolio use are left entirely to teachers to decide. Originality/value – The paper's value is in its argument about the potential for linking ePortfolios to an integrated curriculum by addressing a common problem with the process of embedding of graduate attributes, and in suggesting a role for changed assessment practices to make this possible.
Education + Training – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 26, 2009
Keywords: Communication technologies; Internet; Curriculum development; Graduates
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.