Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Mathews, K. Morrison (1993)
Planning and Accomplishing School-centred Evaluation
Sally Brown, P. Race (1995)
Assess your own teaching quality
G. Gibbs, S. Habeshaw, T. Habeshaw (1988)
53 Interesting Ways to Appraise Your Teaching
P. Jennings, R. Ottewill (1996)
Integrating open learning with face‐to‐face tuition: a strategy for competitive advantageOpen Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 11
J. Marshall, M. Peters (1985)
Evaluation and education: the ideal learning communityPolicy Sciences, 18
M. Chapple, R. Murphy (1996)
The Nominal Group Technique: extending the evaluation of students' teaching and learning experiencesAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 21
D. Rowntree (1998)
Assessing the Quality of Materials-Based Teaching and Learning.Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 13
Joanna Allan (1996)
Learning outcomes in higher educationStudies in Higher Education, 21
P. Jennings, R. Ottewill (1998)
Open learning versus lecturing - creating and sustaining competitive advantage in business and management education
L. Taylor (1994)
Reflecting on Teaching: the benefits of self‐evaluationAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 19
M. Thorpe (1988)
Evaluating open and distance learning
Lynn Clouder (1998)
Getting the ‘Right Answers’: student evaluation as a reflection of intellectual development?Teaching in Higher Education, 3
Mary Melrose (1998)
Exploring Paradigms of Curriculum Evaluation and Concepts of QualityQuality in Higher Education, 4
J. Donald, D. Denison (1996)
Evaluating Undergraduate Education: the use of broad indicatorsAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 21
B. Macfarlane (1994)
Issues concerning the development of the undergraduate business studies curriculum in UK higher education
Richard Krueger (1989)
Focus groups : a practical guide for applied research / by Richard A. Krueger, 1994
Examines the outcomes of an evaluation exercise undertaken by tutors responsible for the delivery of contextual material to first year students on the socio-demographic environment of business and public services. Working within the precepts of the critical paradigm of curriculum evaluation establishes the extent to which students perceive the course content to be vocational as well as their views on other aspects of the design and delivery of the unit. Describes key elements of the evaluation, namely that it was summative, tutor led, positivist and determinist, structured and quantitative. Assesses the findings which suggest that while, in general, the course is well received more could be done to strengthen its vocational orientation. Outlines how tutors have adjusted the learning and teaching strategy to make the unit more explicitly vocational and steps being taken to ensure that evaluation is a learning experience for students as well as tutors.
Education + Training – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 1, 2000
Keywords: Vocational training; Evaluation; Learning; Strategy; Undergraduates
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.