Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Basrur
Evaluation of the food premises inspection and disclosure system”, available at
S. Spear
Scores on Doors
J. Taylor (1974)
The role of risk in consumer behavior.Journal of Marketing, 38
D. Worsfold (2006)
Eating out: Consumer perceptions of food safetyInternational Journal of Environmental Health Research, 16
C. Archibald
FSA ‘should iron out bugs’
Food Standards Agency Northern Ireland (FSANI)
“18% of public in Northern Ireland look in loo for hygiene indicators
D. Worsfold (2005)
Protecting consumers: A review of hygiene award schemesBritish Food Journal, 107
D. Worsfold (2006)
Consumer information on hygiene inspections of food premisesJournal of Foodservice, 17
Mori Survey for Kimberley‐Clark Professional
Food Hygiene Perceptions Report 2004: Key Lessons from International Research
D. Statham
From farm to fork
S. Fein, C.T. Lin, A. Levy
Foodborne illness: perceptions, experience and preventative
G. Jin, Phillip Leslie (2002)
The Effect of Information on Product Quality: Evidence from Restaurant Hygiene Grade CardsIO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets
Food Standards Agency (FSA)
Eating out: your rights”, available at
Food Standards Agency (FSA)
Development of FSA‐sponsored ‘Scores on Doors’ pilot schemes (PRO 06/09/01)
Greenwich Council
Food hygiene award scheme”, available at
ICM Research
Hygiene survey”, available at
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to determine the utility to consumers of hygiene disclosure schemes for eating places. Design/methodology/approach – A sample of hygiene disclosure schemes operated by local authorities in the UK was examined for features that might be expected to influence consumer awareness and behaviour. Findings – The survey revealed that schemes differed in the interpretation of scores, the extent of information disclosed, the communication channels used to disclose information and the amount of publicity provided for businesses and the public. The majority of schemes provide certificates which businesses are encouraged to display prominently. Hygiene inspection information is posted on the web sites of all the local authorities. Research limitations/implications – The number of schemes in this study was limited. A comprehensive evaluation of the current UK “Scores on Doors” schemes will have to take into account a large number of schemes with a very large number of variables, making its feasibility questionable. Practical implications – The “Scores on Doors” schemes will only be successful if the public are fully aware of them and the schemes are well respected. They will have to be well publicised, to operate in an open, transparent manner and be consistent and fair. This study shows that, although the schemes have some features in common, there is considerable lack of consistency, particularly in the representation of scores as symbols. Originality/value – Published evaluations of hygiene disclosure schemes relate to schemes operating outside the UK. This study examines some of the features of current UK schemes that will require consideration if a consistent nation‐wide scheme is to be developed.
Nutrition & Food Science – Emerald Publishing
Published: Feb 8, 2008
Keywords: Online databases; Hygiene; Food industry
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.