Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2002)
URL: http://www.surf.nl/copyright/keyissues/scholarlycommunication/principles.php#Princ iples Notes
(1998)
Position Paper on Yale University Copyright Policy Prepared for the Cooperative Research Committee
(1996)
Copyright assignment – some practical considerations
K. Crews (1985)
Copyright, Fair Use, and the Challenge for Universities: Promoting the Progress of Higher Education
J. Davies (2001)
Policy Approaches to Copyright in HEIs: A Study for the JISC Committee on Awareness, Liaison and TrainingLibrary Management, 22
(2002)
Archive User Survey
(2001)
Managing the Risk of Copyright Infringement Liability, Texas, University of Texas System
P. Bolman (2003)
Open Access: what does it mean for STI distribution?
(2000)
Personal correspondents to Elizabeth Gadd Defining and certifying electronic publication in science. A proposal to the International Association of STM Publishers
S. Bennett
Position Paper on Yale University Copyright Policy, Prepared for the Cooperative Research Committee, Yale University
(2002)
Report of the HEFCE, Universities UK and Standing Conference of Principals (SCOP) Working Group on intellectual property rights (IPRs) in e-learning programmes
J. Willinsky (2002)
Copyright Contradictions in Scholarly PublishingFirst Monday, 7
F. Schalkwyk (1998)
Beyond copyright: Reconsidering the author/ publisher/reader relationshipLogos, 9
Peter Suber (2003)
Removing the Barriers to Research: An Introduction to Open Access for LibrariansCollege & Research Libraries News, 64
(2002)
The Zwolle approach: balancing stakeholders' interests in scholarshipfriendly copyright practices Report of working conference on Copyright and Universities: from principles to practices
(2002)
Final Report from the JISC Scholarly Communications Group (SCG) to the Research Support Libraries Group (RSLG)
M. Angell, J. Kassirer (1991)
The Ingelfinger Rule revisited.The New England journal of medicine, 325 19
T. Schuller (1991)
The Future of Higher Education.
S. Morris (2000)
Authors and copyrightLearned Publishing, 13
M. Rose (1993)
Authors and Owners: The Invention of Copyright
J. Guédon (2005)
In Oldenburg's Long Shadow: Librarians, Research Scientists, Publishers, and the Control of Scientific Publishing
AAU/ARL
Report of the AAU Task Force on Intellectual Property Rights in an Electronic Environment
(2003)
Available online via Bowker
Peter Nathan, Millicent Abell, Prudence Adler, H. Barschall, Scott Bennett, David Bressaud, Gregory Crane, L. Gasaway, J. Ginsburg, R. Kraft, Nancy Marshall, Peter Menell, A. Okerson, Alfred Sumberg, C. Timberlake, B. Rous, C. Day (2000)
Intellectual Property Rights in an Electronic EnvironmentJournal of Library Administration, 29
A. Swan (1999)
‘WHAT AUTHORS WANT’: the ALPSP research study on the motivations and concerns of contributors to learned journalsLearned Publishing, 12
(2000)
Model Grant of Licence
S. Harnad (2001)
For Whom the Gate Tolls? How and Why to Free the Refereed Research Literature Online Through Author/Institution Self-Archiving, Now.Historical Social Research, 29
Association of Research Libraries (ARL)
Principles for Emerging Systems of Scholarly Publishing
Joint Information Systems Committee
Kieron Flanagan, K. Malik, P. Halfpenny, L. Georghiou (2002)
A Comparative Study of the Purchase, Management and Use of Large-scale Research Equipment in the UK and US Universities (report for Evidence Ltd on behalf of the Higher Education Funding Council for England)
(2002)
The market for scientific, technical and medical journals: A statement by the OFT
(2002)
Managing intellectual property: a guide to strategic decision-making in universities
Sanjeev Kulkarni (1995)
All Professors Create Equally: Why Faculty Should Have Complete Control Over the Intellectual Proper
(1999)
Copyright Policy for universities: A proposal from the SURF Foundation for a joint copyright policy for the Dutch universities. The Netherlands, SURF Foundation /IWI and Open Universiteit Nederland
S. Lawrence (2001)
Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impactNature, 411
(2003)
Focus on Access to Institutional Resources programme
(2002)
Why I ...believe Cambridge's IPR Proposals Threaten Academic Freedom
D. Law, R. Weedon, M. Sheen (2000)
Universities and article copyrightLearned Publishing, 14
Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers (ALPSP)
Authors and Electonic Publishing
(2000)
Principles for emerging systems of scholarly publishing. Association of Research Libraries
(2000)
Excellence and opportunity - science and innovation policy for the 21st century
(1977)
Patents Act 1977, Ch
J. Bammel (1999)
The Publisher - Author Relationship Principles of Good Practice in Scholarly Journal PublishingLearn. Publ., 12
Employment. (2001)
Opportunity for all in a world of change
Steve Lawren (2001)
Online or invisible ?
H. Carty (1989)
Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988Modern Law Review, 52
(2002)
Cambridge row over rights plan
L. Colaianni (1991)
Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical JournalsAnnals of Clinical Biochemistry, 28
(2001)
Is copyright strangling higher education?
(2002)
Authors and electronic publishing: the ALPSP research study on authors' and readers' views of electronic research communication
R. Crow (2002)
The case for institutional repositories : a SPARC position paper
(1996)
Copyright in HEIs: a discussion paper. Strathclyde, Department of Information Science
A. Williamson (1997)
Journal PublishingBMJ, 314
(2002)
The next Research Assessment Exercise will probably include citation analysis
D. Revill (2002)
Clearing the Way: Copyright Clearance in UK LibrariesNew Library World, 103
This is the first of a series of studies emanating from the UK JISC‐funded RoMEO Project (Rights Metadata for Open‐archiving) which investigated the IPR issues relating to academic author self‐archiving of research papers. It considers the claims for copyright ownership in research papers by universities, academics, and publishers by drawing on the literature, a survey of 542 academic authors and an analysis of 80 journal publisher copyright transfer agreements. The paper concludes that self‐archiving is not best supported by copyright transfer to publishers. It recommends that universities assert their interest in copyright ownership in the long term, that academics retain rights in the short term, and that publishers consider new ways of protecting the value they add through journal publishing.
Journal of Documentation – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 1, 2003
Keywords: Universities; Publishing; Academic staff; Copyright; Ownership; Document management
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.