Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Comment on “Incidence and efficacy of Stent Placement in Leak Management After Bariatric Surgery: an MBSAQIP Analysis”

Comment on “Incidence and efficacy of Stent Placement in Leak Management After Bariatric Surgery:... Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/annalsofsurgery by BhDMf5ePHKbH4TTImqenVA5KvPVPZ0P5BEgU+IUTEfzO/GUWifn2IfwcEVVH9SSn on 06/03/2020 Letters to the Editor Annals of Surgery  Volume 270, Number 6, December 2019 who underwent stent insertion, 107 (39%) covered stents (18% vs 40% – 50%) and the REFERENCES required reoperation. Strikingly, when we number of endoscopic interventions was sig- 1. Fujita S, Mizusawa J, Kanemitsu Y, et al. Color- 3– 7 examined these ‘‘reoperations,’’ 86 (80%) nificantly lower (3 vs 4 – 5). Endoscopic ectal Cancer Study Group of Japan Clinical Oncol- ogy G. Mesorectal excision with or without lateral were performed before stent insertion and interventions alone achieved healing in 82% lymph node dissection for clinical stage II/III lower 11 (10%) had a reoperation simultaneously of patients, whereas reoperation after stent rectal cancer (JCOG0212): a multicenter, random- with stent placement, and only 10 (9%) placement was performed in 1 patient only ized controlled, noninferiority trial. Ann Surg. required a reoperation after stent placement. (2%). 2017;266:201 – 207. To our understanding, we cannot consider a In conclusion, again we thank the 2. Akiyoshi T, Watanabe T, Miyata S, et al. Japanese Society for Cancer of the C, Rectum. Results of a reoperation performed before stent place- authors for their effort http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Annals of Surgery Wolters Kluwer Health

Comment on “Incidence and efficacy of Stent Placement in Leak Management After Bariatric Surgery: an MBSAQIP Analysis”

Shehab,, Hany
Annals of Surgery , Volume 270 (6) – Dec 1, 2019
Download PDF
2 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wolters-kluwer-health/comment-on-incidence-and-efficacy-of-stent-placement-in-leak-aY0FBxQxXi

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Wolters Kluwer Health
ISSN
0003-4932
eISSN
1528-1140
DOI
10.1097/SLA.0000000000003243
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/annalsofsurgery by BhDMf5ePHKbH4TTImqenVA5KvPVPZ0P5BEgU+IUTEfzO/GUWifn2IfwcEVVH9SSn on 06/03/2020 Letters to the Editor Annals of Surgery  Volume 270, Number 6, December 2019 who underwent stent insertion, 107 (39%) covered stents (18% vs 40% – 50%) and the REFERENCES required reoperation. Strikingly, when we number of endoscopic interventions was sig- 1. Fujita S, Mizusawa J, Kanemitsu Y, et al. Color- 3– 7 examined these ‘‘reoperations,’’ 86 (80%) nificantly lower (3 vs 4 – 5). Endoscopic ectal Cancer Study Group of Japan Clinical Oncol- ogy G. Mesorectal excision with or without lateral were performed before stent insertion and interventions alone achieved healing in 82% lymph node dissection for clinical stage II/III lower 11 (10%) had a reoperation simultaneously of patients, whereas reoperation after stent rectal cancer (JCOG0212): a multicenter, random- with stent placement, and only 10 (9%) placement was performed in 1 patient only ized controlled, noninferiority trial. Ann Surg. required a reoperation after stent placement. (2%). 2017;266:201 – 207. To our understanding, we cannot consider a In conclusion, again we thank the 2. Akiyoshi T, Watanabe T, Miyata S, et al. Japanese Society for Cancer of the C, Rectum. Results of a reoperation performed before stent place- authors for their effort

Journal

Annals of Surgery – Wolters Kluwer Health

Published: Dec 1, 2019

There are no references for this article.