Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Atsushi Senju, Mark Johnson (2009)
The eye contact effect: mechanisms and developmentTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 13
(2018)
The Tobii I-VT fixation filter. Available at: https:// www.tobiipro.com/siteassets/tobii-pro/learn-and-support/ analyze/how-do-we-classify-eye-movements/tobii-pro-i-vt-fixation-filter.pdf
Lawrence Cai, John Paro, Gordon Lee, R. Nazerali (2018)
Where Do We Look? Assessing Gaze Patterns in Breast Reconstructive Surgery with Eye-Tracking TechnologyPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 141
A. Pusic, A. Klassen, A. Scott, S. Cano (2013)
Development and psychometric evaluation of the FACE-Q satisfaction with appearance scale: a new patient-reported outcome instrument for facial aesthetics patients.Clinics in plastic surgery, 40 2
A. Klassen, S. Cano, C. East, S. Baker, L. Badia, Jonathan Schwitzer, A. Pusic (2016)
Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the FACE-Q Scales for Patients Undergoing Rhinoplasty.JAMA facial plastic surgery, 18 1
Pierre Chandon, J. Hutchinson, Eric Bradlow, S. Young (2009)
Does In-Store Marketing Work? Effects of the Number and Position of Shelf Facings on Brand Attention and Evaluation at the Point of PurchaseJournal of Marketing, 73
Abhilash Jain, J. Nanchahal (1950)
Plastic and reconstructive surgeryBMJ, 324
M. Goin, R. Burgoyne, J. Goin (1976)
FACE‐LIFT OPERATION: THE PATIENTS SECRET MOTIVATIONS AND REACTIONS TO “INFORMED CONSENT”Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 58
Tomasz Kosowski, C. McCarthy, P. Reavey, A. Scott, E. Wilkins, S. Cano, A. Klassen, N. Carr, P. Cordeiro, A. Pusic (2009)
A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures after Facial Cosmetic Surgery and/or Nonsurgical Facial RejuvenationPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 123
A. Matarasso, A. Elkwood, M. Rankin, M. Elkowitz (2000)
National Plastic Surgery Survey: Face Lift Techniques and ComplicationsPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 106
R. Kotler (1983)
Cosmetic facial surgery.JAMA, 249 4
J. Henderson, Wonil Choi (2015)
Neural Correlates of Fixation Duration during Real-world Scene Viewing: Evidence from Fixation-related (FIRE) fMRIJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27
B. Jones, S. Lo (2012)
How Long Does a Face Lift Last? Objective and Subjective Measurements over a 5-Year PeriodPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 130
The Tobii IVT fixation filter
B. Derby, M. Codner (2017)
Evidence-Based Medicine: Face Lift.Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
T. Frazier, M. Strauss, Eric Klingemier, Emily Zetzer, A. Hardan, C. Eng, E. Youngstrom (2017)
A Meta-Analysis of Gaze Differences to Social and Nonsocial Information Between Individuals With and Without Autism.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 56 7
Anneli Olsen, Ricardo Matos (2012)
Identifying parameter values for an I-VT fixation filter suitable for handling data sampled with various sampling frequenciesProceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications
H. Nixon
Attention and interest in advertising
Varun Gupta, J. Winocour, Hanyuan Shi, R. Shack, J. Grotting, K. Higdon (2016)
Preoperative Risk Factors and Complication Rates in Facelift: Analysis of 11,300 Patients.Aesthetic surgery journal, 36 1
Suzie Chang, A. Pusic, Rod Rohrich (2011)
A Systematic Review of Comparison of Efficacy and Complication Rates among Face-Lift TechniquesPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 127
D. Isaacowitz, H. Wadlinger, Deborah Goren, H. Wilson (2006)
Selective preference in visual fixation away from negative images in old age? An eye-tracking study.Psychology and aging, 21 1
P. Meyer-Marcotty, A. Gerdes, A. Stellzig-Eisenhauer, G. Alpers (2011)
Visual Face Perception of Adults with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate in Comparison to Controls—An Eye-Tracking StudyThe Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 48
A. Young, D. Hay, K. McWeeny, B. Flude, A. Ellis (1985)
Matching Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces on Internal and External FeaturesPerception, 14
A. Klassen, S. Cano, Jonathan Schwitzer, S. Baker, A. Carruthers, J. Carruthers, Anne Chapas, A. Pusic (2016)
Development and Psychometric Validation of the FACE-Q Skin, Lips, and Facial Rhytids Appearance Scales and Adverse Effects Checklists for Cosmetic Procedures.JAMA dermatology, 152 4
Tim Chuk, Antoni Chan, J. Hsiao (2014)
Understanding eye movements in face recognition using hidden Markov models.Journal of vision, 14 11
R. Alsarraf, W. Larrabee, Shelia Anderson, C. Murakami, Calvin Johnson (2001)
Measuring cosmetic facial plastic surgery outcomes: a pilot study.Archives of facial plastic surgery, 3 3
(2016)
Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank Statistics.Aesthetic surgery journal, 36 Suppl 1
Background: Aesthetics plays a central role in determining success in plastic surgery. Understanding perceptions of favorable aesthetics is critical to ensure patient satisfaction. Eye-tracking technology offers an objective way of evaluating attention and understanding how viewers direct their focus on patients who undergo cosmetic face-lift procedures. Methods: Thirty-six subjects ranging from layperson to attending plastic surgeon viewed 15 sets of photographs before and after patients underwent an elective face-lift procedure. They were instructed to evaluate the aesthetic quality on a Likert scale while eye-tracking equipment tracked their gaze and analyzed their distribution of attention. Results: Postoperative images showed a Likert score improvement of 0.51 ± 0.26, with the greatest difference in attending cosmetic plastic surgeons (1.36 ± 0.22; p < 0.05). The nose was the most common first fixation location (31 percent of first fixations) and the most viewed area (16 ± 3 percent of fixation time) for all subjects. Experienced subjects spent less time in nonrelevant areas (30 ± 11 percent for attending cosmetic plastic surgeons and 37 ± 10 percent for attending noncosmetic plastic surgeons) compared with less experienced subjects (50 ± 15 percent for laypersons). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that viewers with greater experience in cosmetic surgery focus quickly on the cheeks, chin, and neck and have evenly distributed gaze across the entire face. These results suggest that a layperson’s gaze is drawn to the center of the face (because of both unfamiliarity with the face-lift procedure and the natural tendency to look at the central face), whereas attending plastic surgeons exhibit holistic gaze patterns and are more aware of the impact of the procedure. Palo Alto, Calif. From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University, and Stanford School of Medicine. Received for publication June 15, 2018; accepted December 20, 2018. Disclosure:None of the authors has a financial interest in any of the products or devices mentioned in this article. Rahim S. Nazerali, M.D., M.H.S., 770 Welch Road, Suite 400, Stanford, Calif. 94304, rahimn@stanford.edu
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery – Wolters Kluwer Health
Published: Jul 1, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.