Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The biochar dilemma

The biochar dilemma Any strategy towards widespread adoption of biochar as a soil amendment is constrained by the scarcity of field-scale data on crop response, soil quality and environmental footprint. Impacts of biochar as a soil amendment over a short period based on laboratory and greenhouse studies are often inconclusive and contradictory. Yet biochar is widely advocated as a promising tool to improve soil quality, enhance C sequestration, and increase agronomic yield. While substantial reviews exist on positive aspects of biochar research, almost no review to date has compiled negative aspects of it. Although biochar science is advancing, available data indicate several areas of uncertainty. This article reviews a range of negative impacts of biochar on soil quality, crop yield, and associated financial risk. This review is important because advances in biochar research demand identification of the risks (if any) of using biochar as a soil amendment before any large-scale field application is recommended. It is the first attempt to acknowledge such issues with biochar application in soil. Thus, the aims of this review are to assess the uncertainties of using biochar as a soil amendment, and to clarify ambiguity regarding interpretation of research results. Along with several unfavourable changes in soil chemical, physical and biological properties, reduction in crop yield has been reported. Relative to controls, the yield for biochar-amended soil (application rate 0.220% w/w) has been reduced by 27, 11, 36, 74, and 2% for rice (Oryza sativa L.) (control 3.0Mgha1), wheat (Triticum spp. L.) (control 4.6Mgha1), maize (Zea mays L.) (control 4.7Mgha1), lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) (control 5.4Mgha1), and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) (control 265Mgha1), respectively. Additionally, compared with unamended soils, gaseous emissions from biochar-amended soils (application rate 0.00510% w/w) have been enhanced up to 61, 152 and 14% for CO2 (control 9.7Mgha1 year1), CH4 (control 222kg ha1 year1), and N2O (control 4.3kg ha1 year1), respectively. Although biochar has the potential to mitigate several environmental problems, the data collated herein indicate that a systematic road-map for manufacturing classification of biochars, and costbenefit analysis, must be developed before implementation of field-scale application. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Soil Research CSIRO Publishing

The biochar dilemma

Soil Research , Volume 52 (3): 14 – Mar 31, 2014

Loading next page...
 
/lp/csiro-publishing/the-biochar-dilemma-lnHDW6STyR

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
CSIRO Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published by CSIRO Publishing
ISSN
1838-675X
eISSN
1838-6768
DOI
10.1071/SR13359
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Any strategy towards widespread adoption of biochar as a soil amendment is constrained by the scarcity of field-scale data on crop response, soil quality and environmental footprint. Impacts of biochar as a soil amendment over a short period based on laboratory and greenhouse studies are often inconclusive and contradictory. Yet biochar is widely advocated as a promising tool to improve soil quality, enhance C sequestration, and increase agronomic yield. While substantial reviews exist on positive aspects of biochar research, almost no review to date has compiled negative aspects of it. Although biochar science is advancing, available data indicate several areas of uncertainty. This article reviews a range of negative impacts of biochar on soil quality, crop yield, and associated financial risk. This review is important because advances in biochar research demand identification of the risks (if any) of using biochar as a soil amendment before any large-scale field application is recommended. It is the first attempt to acknowledge such issues with biochar application in soil. Thus, the aims of this review are to assess the uncertainties of using biochar as a soil amendment, and to clarify ambiguity regarding interpretation of research results. Along with several unfavourable changes in soil chemical, physical and biological properties, reduction in crop yield has been reported. Relative to controls, the yield for biochar-amended soil (application rate 0.220% w/w) has been reduced by 27, 11, 36, 74, and 2% for rice (Oryza sativa L.) (control 3.0Mgha1), wheat (Triticum spp. L.) (control 4.6Mgha1), maize (Zea mays L.) (control 4.7Mgha1), lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) (control 5.4Mgha1), and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) (control 265Mgha1), respectively. Additionally, compared with unamended soils, gaseous emissions from biochar-amended soils (application rate 0.00510% w/w) have been enhanced up to 61, 152 and 14% for CO2 (control 9.7Mgha1 year1), CH4 (control 222kg ha1 year1), and N2O (control 4.3kg ha1 year1), respectively. Although biochar has the potential to mitigate several environmental problems, the data collated herein indicate that a systematic road-map for manufacturing classification of biochars, and costbenefit analysis, must be developed before implementation of field-scale application.

Journal

Soil ResearchCSIRO Publishing

Published: Mar 31, 2014

References