Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Errors in Discussion Section, Conclusion, and Figure Legend

Errors in Discussion Section, Conclusion, and Figure Legend Letters tence of the Conclusions section, reference 34 should be added following refer- CORRECTION ences 14 and 33. Finally, the legend of Figure 3 should be replaced with the follow- Errors in Discussion Section, Conclusion, and Figure Legend: In the Original ing: “Infants in the responsive parenting group have lower weight-for-length Investigation titled “Effect of the INSIGHT Responsive Parenting Intervention on percentiles at age 1 year compared with control group infants (ANOVA P = .04). Rapid Infant Weight Gain and Overweight Status at Age 1 Year: a randomized clini- Among responsive parenting group infants, 5.5% were overweight at age 1 year cal trial,” published online June 6, 2016, there were errors in the Discussion sec- compared with 12.7% of control group infants.” This article was corrected online. tion, the Conclusions section, and in the legend of Figure 3. In the first sentence of 1. Savage JS, Birch LL, Marini M, Anzman-Frasca S, Paul IM. Effect of the the second paragraph of the Discussion section, “Nourishing Our Understanding of Role-modeling to Improve Support and Health” should be replaced with INSIGHT responsive parenting intervention on rapid infant weight gain and “NOURISH-RCT.” In the third sentence of the fourth paragraph of the http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png JAMA Pediatrics American Medical Association

Errors in Discussion Section, Conclusion, and Figure Legend

JAMA Pediatrics , Volume 170 (12) – Dec 10, 2016
Download PDF
1 page

Errors in Discussion Section, Conclusion, and Figure Legend

Abstract

Letters tence of the Conclusions section, reference 34 should be added following refer- CORRECTION ences 14 and 33. Finally, the legend of Figure 3 should be replaced with the follow- Errors in Discussion Section, Conclusion, and Figure Legend: In the Original ing: “Infants in the responsive parenting group have lower weight-for-length Investigation titled “Effect of the INSIGHT Responsive Parenting Intervention on percentiles at age 1 year compared with control group infants...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/errors-in-discussion-section-conclusion-and-figure-legend-7aUX9Wgr3d

References (1)

Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright 2016 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN
2168-6203
eISSN
2168-6211
DOI
10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.3457
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Letters tence of the Conclusions section, reference 34 should be added following refer- CORRECTION ences 14 and 33. Finally, the legend of Figure 3 should be replaced with the follow- Errors in Discussion Section, Conclusion, and Figure Legend: In the Original ing: “Infants in the responsive parenting group have lower weight-for-length Investigation titled “Effect of the INSIGHT Responsive Parenting Intervention on percentiles at age 1 year compared with control group infants (ANOVA P = .04). Rapid Infant Weight Gain and Overweight Status at Age 1 Year: a randomized clini- Among responsive parenting group infants, 5.5% were overweight at age 1 year cal trial,” published online June 6, 2016, there were errors in the Discussion sec- compared with 12.7% of control group infants.” This article was corrected online. tion, the Conclusions section, and in the legend of Figure 3. In the first sentence of 1. Savage JS, Birch LL, Marini M, Anzman-Frasca S, Paul IM. Effect of the the second paragraph of the Discussion section, “Nourishing Our Understanding of Role-modeling to Improve Support and Health” should be replaced with INSIGHT responsive parenting intervention on rapid infant weight gain and “NOURISH-RCT.” In the third sentence of the fourth paragraph of the

Journal

JAMA Pediatrics – American Medical Association

Published: Dec 10, 2016

There are no references for this article.