Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Effect of Hospitalist Workload on the Quality and Efficiency of Care

Effect of Hospitalist Workload on the Quality and Efficiency of Care ImportanceHospitalist physicians face increasing pressure to maximize productivity, which may undermine the efficiency and quality of care. ObjectiveTo determine the association between hospitalist workload and the efficiency and quality of inpatient care. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of 20 241 admissions of inpatients cared for by a private hospitalist group at a large academic community hospital system between February 1, 2008, and January 31, 2011. ExposuresDaily hospitalist workload as measured by relative value units and patient encounters from the hospitalist billing records. Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe main outcomes were length of stay (LOS), cost, rapid response team activation, in-hospital mortality, patient satisfaction, and 30-day readmission rates. Key covariates included hospital occupancy and patient-level characteristics. ResultsThe LOS increased as workload increased, particularly at lower hospital occupancy. For hospital occupancies less than 75%, LOS increased from 5.5 to 7.5 days as workload increased. For occupancies of 75% to 85%, LOS increased exponentially above a daily relative value unit of approximately 25 and a census value of approximately 15. At high occupancy (>85%), LOS was J-shaped, with significant increases at higher ranges of workload. After controlling for LOS, cost increased by $111 for each 1-unit increase in relative value unit and $205 for each 1-unit increase in census across the range of values. Changes in workload were not associated with the remaining outcomes. Conclusions and RelevanceIncreasing hospitalist workload is associated with clinically meaningful increases in LOS and cost. Although our findings should be validated in different clinical settings, our results suggest the need for methods to mitigate the potential negative effects of increased hospitalist workload on the efficiency and cost of care. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png JAMA Internal Medicine American Medical Association

Effect of Hospitalist Workload on the Quality and Efficiency of Care

Download PDF
8 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/effect-of-hospitalist-workload-on-the-quality-and-efficiency-of-care-0LqCW32uXm

References (37)

Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright 2014 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.
ISSN
2168-6106
eISSN
2168-6114
DOI
10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.300
pmid
24686924
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

ImportanceHospitalist physicians face increasing pressure to maximize productivity, which may undermine the efficiency and quality of care. ObjectiveTo determine the association between hospitalist workload and the efficiency and quality of inpatient care. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of 20 241 admissions of inpatients cared for by a private hospitalist group at a large academic community hospital system between February 1, 2008, and January 31, 2011. ExposuresDaily hospitalist workload as measured by relative value units and patient encounters from the hospitalist billing records. Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe main outcomes were length of stay (LOS), cost, rapid response team activation, in-hospital mortality, patient satisfaction, and 30-day readmission rates. Key covariates included hospital occupancy and patient-level characteristics. ResultsThe LOS increased as workload increased, particularly at lower hospital occupancy. For hospital occupancies less than 75%, LOS increased from 5.5 to 7.5 days as workload increased. For occupancies of 75% to 85%, LOS increased exponentially above a daily relative value unit of approximately 25 and a census value of approximately 15. At high occupancy (>85%), LOS was J-shaped, with significant increases at higher ranges of workload. After controlling for LOS, cost increased by $111 for each 1-unit increase in relative value unit and $205 for each 1-unit increase in census across the range of values. Changes in workload were not associated with the remaining outcomes. Conclusions and RelevanceIncreasing hospitalist workload is associated with clinically meaningful increases in LOS and cost. Although our findings should be validated in different clinical settings, our results suggest the need for methods to mitigate the potential negative effects of increased hospitalist workload on the efficiency and cost of care.

Journal

JAMA Internal Medicine – American Medical Association

Published: May 1, 2014

There are no references for this article.