Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Objectives Background Methods Results Conclusions
M. May, G. Wells, D. So, A. Chong, A. Dick, M. Froeschl, C. Glover, B. Hibbert, J. Marquis, Melissa Blondeau, C. Osborne, Andrea MacDougall, M. Kass, V. Paddock, A. Quraishi, M. Labinaz (2020)
Safety and Efficacy of Femoral Access vs Radial Access in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: The SAFARI-STEMI Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA cardiology
S. Jolly, S. Yusuf, J. Cairns, K. Niemelä, D. Xavier, P. Widimsky, A. Budaj, M. Niemelä, V. Valentín, B. Lewis, Á. Avezum, P. Steg, S. Rao, P. Gao, Rizwan Afzal, C. Joyner, S. Chrolavicius, S. Mehta (2011)
Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trialThe Lancet, 377
Romagnoli (2012)
Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study.J Am Coll Cardiol, 60
M. May, Kuljit Singh, G. Wells (2015)
Efficacy of Radial Versus Femoral Access in the Acute Coronary Syndrome: Is it the Operator or the Operation That Matters?JACC. Cardiovascular interventions, 8 11
T. Lo, J. Nolan, E. Fountzopoulos, M. Behan, R. Butler, S. Hetherington, K. Vijayalakshmi, R. Rajagopal, D. Fraser, A. Zaman, D. Hildick-Smith (2008)
Radial artery anomaly and its influence on transradial coronary procedural outcomeHeart, 95
Letters 4. Douglas PS, Hoffmann U, Patel MR, et al; PROMISE Investigators. Outcomes crossover to ulnar access can be considered to keep wrist of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. access and avoid the femoral artery. 2015;372(14):1291-1300. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1415516 5. Maron DJ, Hochman JS, Reynolds HR, et al; ISCHEMIA Research Group. Initial Pierfrancesco Agostoni, MD, PhD invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. Carlo Zivelonghi, MD 2020;382(15):1395-1407. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1915922 Paul Vermeersch, MD, PhD 6. Chacko L, P Howard J, Rajkumar C, et al. Effects of percutaneous coronary intervention on death and myocardial infarction stratified by stable and unstable coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled Author Affiliations: HartCentrum, Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen (ZNA) trials. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020;13(2):e006363. doi:10.1161/ Middelheim, Antwerp, Belgium. CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006363 Corresponding Author: Pierfrancesco Agostoni, MD, PhD, HartCentrum, Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen (ZNA) Middelheim, Lindendreef 1, Antwerp 2020, Belgium (agostonipf@gmail.com). Residual Challenges in Radial Approach Published Online: September 2, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2020.3687 for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported. To the Editor We read with interest the article by Le May et al 1. Le May M, Wells G, So D, et al. Safety and efficacy
JAMA Cardiology – American Medical Association
Published: Dec 2, 2020
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.