Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Residual Challenges in Radial Approach for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions—Reply

Residual Challenges in Radial Approach for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions—Reply Letters 4. Douglas PS, Hoffmann U, Patel MR, et al; PROMISE Investigators. Outcomes crossover to ulnar access can be considered to keep wrist of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. access and avoid the femoral artery. 2015;372(14):1291-1300. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1415516 5. Maron DJ, Hochman JS, Reynolds HR, et al; ISCHEMIA Research Group. Initial Pierfrancesco Agostoni, MD, PhD invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. Carlo Zivelonghi, MD 2020;382(15):1395-1407. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1915922 Paul Vermeersch, MD, PhD 6. Chacko L, P Howard J, Rajkumar C, et al. Effects of percutaneous coronary intervention on death and myocardial infarction stratified by stable and unstable coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled Author Affiliations: HartCentrum, Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen (ZNA) trials. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020;13(2):e006363. doi:10.1161/ Middelheim, Antwerp, Belgium. CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006363 Corresponding Author: Pierfrancesco Agostoni, MD, PhD, HartCentrum, Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen (ZNA) Middelheim, Lindendreef 1, Antwerp 2020, Belgium (agostonipf@gmail.com). Residual Challenges in Radial Approach Published Online: September 2, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2020.3687 for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported. To the Editor We read with interest the article by Le May et al 1. Le May M, Wells G, So D, et al. Safety and efficacy http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png JAMA Cardiology American Medical Association

Residual Challenges in Radial Approach for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions—Reply

JAMA Cardiology , Volume 5 (12) – Dec 2, 2020

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/residual-challenges-in-radial-approach-for-percutaneous-coronary-nXNBn87UQS

References (6)

Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright 2020 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN
2380-6583
eISSN
2380-6591
DOI
10.1001/jamacardio.2020.3730
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Letters 4. Douglas PS, Hoffmann U, Patel MR, et al; PROMISE Investigators. Outcomes crossover to ulnar access can be considered to keep wrist of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. access and avoid the femoral artery. 2015;372(14):1291-1300. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1415516 5. Maron DJ, Hochman JS, Reynolds HR, et al; ISCHEMIA Research Group. Initial Pierfrancesco Agostoni, MD, PhD invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. Carlo Zivelonghi, MD 2020;382(15):1395-1407. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1915922 Paul Vermeersch, MD, PhD 6. Chacko L, P Howard J, Rajkumar C, et al. Effects of percutaneous coronary intervention on death and myocardial infarction stratified by stable and unstable coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled Author Affiliations: HartCentrum, Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen (ZNA) trials. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020;13(2):e006363. doi:10.1161/ Middelheim, Antwerp, Belgium. CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006363 Corresponding Author: Pierfrancesco Agostoni, MD, PhD, HartCentrum, Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen (ZNA) Middelheim, Lindendreef 1, Antwerp 2020, Belgium (agostonipf@gmail.com). Residual Challenges in Radial Approach Published Online: September 2, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2020.3687 for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported. To the Editor We read with interest the article by Le May et al 1. Le May M, Wells G, So D, et al. Safety and efficacy

Journal

JAMA CardiologyAmerican Medical Association

Published: Dec 2, 2020

There are no references for this article.