Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Refining the Diagnosis of Type 2 Myocardial Infarction

Refining the Diagnosis of Type 2 Myocardial Infarction Letters 1. Case MA, Burwick HA, Volpp KG, Patel MS. Accuracy of smartphone and are more likely to be dead after 1 year than those with applications and wearable devices for tracking physical activity data. JAMA. 2 type 1 myocardial infarction. In the absence of prospective 2015;313(6):625-626. and systematic studies of patients with acute myocardial 2. Murakami H, Kawakami R, Nakae S, et al. Accuracy of wearable devices for injury, the proportion of patients with unrecognized coro- estimating total energy expenditure: comparison with metabolic chamber and nary artery disease or imaging evidence of infarction in doubly labeled water method. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(5):702-703. whom a diagnosis of type 2 myocardial infarction may be 3. Laukkanen RMT, Virtanen PK. Heart rate monitors: state of the art. J Sports Sci. 1998;16(suppl):S3-S7. beneficial is unknown. 4. Terbizan DJ, Dolezal BA, Albano C. Validity of seven commercially available heart rate monitors. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2002;6:243-247. Andrew R. Chapman, MD 5. El-Amrawy F, Nounou MI. Are currently available wearable devices for Nicholas L. Mills, MD, PhD activity tracking and heart rate monitoring accurate, precise, and medically beneficial? Healthc Inform Res. 2015;21(4):315-320. Author Affiliations: British Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular 6. Patel MS, http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png JAMA Cardiology American Medical Association

Refining the Diagnosis of Type 2 Myocardial Infarction

Chapman, Andrew R.; Mills, Nicholas L.
JAMA Cardiology , Volume 2 (1) – Jan 19, 2017
Download PDF
2 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/refining-the-diagnosis-of-type-2-myocardial-infarction-i7qpacfqnh

References (5)

Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright 2017 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.
ISSN
2380-6583
eISSN
2380-6591
DOI
10.1001/jamacardio.2016.3698
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Letters 1. Case MA, Burwick HA, Volpp KG, Patel MS. Accuracy of smartphone and are more likely to be dead after 1 year than those with applications and wearable devices for tracking physical activity data. JAMA. 2 type 1 myocardial infarction. In the absence of prospective 2015;313(6):625-626. and systematic studies of patients with acute myocardial 2. Murakami H, Kawakami R, Nakae S, et al. Accuracy of wearable devices for injury, the proportion of patients with unrecognized coro- estimating total energy expenditure: comparison with metabolic chamber and nary artery disease or imaging evidence of infarction in doubly labeled water method. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(5):702-703. whom a diagnosis of type 2 myocardial infarction may be 3. Laukkanen RMT, Virtanen PK. Heart rate monitors: state of the art. J Sports Sci. 1998;16(suppl):S3-S7. beneficial is unknown. 4. Terbizan DJ, Dolezal BA, Albano C. Validity of seven commercially available heart rate monitors. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2002;6:243-247. Andrew R. Chapman, MD 5. El-Amrawy F, Nounou MI. Are currently available wearable devices for Nicholas L. Mills, MD, PhD activity tracking and heart rate monitoring accurate, precise, and medically beneficial? Healthc Inform Res. 2015;21(4):315-320. Author Affiliations: British Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular 6. Patel MS,

Journal

JAMA Cardiology – American Medical Association

Published: Jan 19, 2017

There are no references for this article.