Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Impugning the Integrity of Medical Science

Impugning the Integrity of Medical Science Editorials represent the opinions EDITORIAL of the authors and JAMA and not those of the American Medical Association. The Adverse Effects of Industry Influence tonotethatforsomeofthereferencedpublicationslistedinthe Catherine D. DeAngelis, MD, MPH Table of the article by Ross et al, some of the authors either did Phil B. Fontanarosa, MD, MBA not actually receive financial support from the company; were not required by the journal in which the study was published HE PROFESSION OF MEDICINE, IN EVERY ASPECT— todisclosetheirfinancialsupportorrelationshipwiththespon- clinical, education, and research—has been inun- sor; did report their financial support or relationship with the dated with profound influence from the pharma- sponsor, but the journal chose not to publish those author dis- Tceutical and medical device industries. This has closures; or did disclose their financial support, and those dis- occurred because physicians have allowed it to happen, and closures were published. it is time to stop. However, it is clear that at least some of the authors played 1,2 Two articles in this issue of JAMA provide a glimpse of little direct roles in the study or review, yet still allowed them- one company’s apparent misrepresentation of research data selves to be named as authors. Individuals, particularly phy- and its http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png JAMA American Medical Association

Impugning the Integrity of Medical Science

JAMA , Volume 299 (15) – Apr 16, 2008

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/impugning-the-integrity-of-medical-science-Sj8SJ10LEe

References (26)

Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.
ISSN
0098-7484
eISSN
1538-3598
DOI
10.1001/jama.299.15.1833
pmid
18413880
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Editorials represent the opinions EDITORIAL of the authors and JAMA and not those of the American Medical Association. The Adverse Effects of Industry Influence tonotethatforsomeofthereferencedpublicationslistedinthe Catherine D. DeAngelis, MD, MPH Table of the article by Ross et al, some of the authors either did Phil B. Fontanarosa, MD, MBA not actually receive financial support from the company; were not required by the journal in which the study was published HE PROFESSION OF MEDICINE, IN EVERY ASPECT— todisclosetheirfinancialsupportorrelationshipwiththespon- clinical, education, and research—has been inun- sor; did report their financial support or relationship with the dated with profound influence from the pharma- sponsor, but the journal chose not to publish those author dis- Tceutical and medical device industries. This has closures; or did disclose their financial support, and those dis- occurred because physicians have allowed it to happen, and closures were published. it is time to stop. However, it is clear that at least some of the authors played 1,2 Two articles in this issue of JAMA provide a glimpse of little direct roles in the study or review, yet still allowed them- one company’s apparent misrepresentation of research data selves to be named as authors. Individuals, particularly phy- and its

Journal

JAMAAmerican Medical Association

Published: Apr 16, 2008

There are no references for this article.