Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/american-medical-association/the-proliferation-of-reports-on-clinical-scoring-systems-KDHOLmRvn6
References (6)
-
J. Kanis, N. Harvey, H. Johansson, A. Odén, W. Leslie, E. McCloskey (2017)
FRAX Update.Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry, 20 3
-
J. Aalbers, K. O'Brien, W. Chan, G. Falk, C. Teljeur, B. Dimitrov, T. Fahey (2011)
Predicting streptococcal pharyngitis in adults in primary care: a systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of symptoms and signs and validation of the Centor scoreBMC Medicine, 9
-
N. Shah, E. Steyerberg, D. Kent (2018)
Big Data and Predictive Analytics: Recalibrating ExpectationsJAMA, 320
-
Singer (2016)
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).JAMA, 315
-
M. Shankar-Hari, Gary Phillips, M. Levy, C. Seymour, Vincent Liu, C. Deutschman, D. Angus, G. Rubenfeld, M. Singer (2016)
Developing a New Definition and Assessing New Clinical Criteria for Septic Shock: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).JAMA, 315 8
-
T. Bodenheimer (1999)
The American health care system--the movement for improved quality in health care.The New England journal of medicine, 340 6
- Publisher
- American Medical Association
- Copyright
- Copyright 2019 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
- ISSN
- 0098-7484
- eISSN
- 1538-3598
- DOI
- 10.1001/jama.2019.5284
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
This Viewpoint charts the rise in publications describing risk prediction tools, such as the FRAX, CHADS2, and SOFA scores, and discusses the implications of using algorithms for clinical decisions in the absence of evidence about the effects of the tools on patient care and outcomes.
Journal
JAMA – American Medical Association
Published: Jun 25, 2019